Not automatically, no, but it is easy to hit NPCs with collateral damage during those battles which will turn everyone hostile and drop your reputation. (View Post)

Correct, the CWs are concerned about controlling arcane spellcasting. They're not worried about priest spells or the use of magic items, though anyone casting arcane spells to create magic items coul… (View Post)

5th edition kept alignment but removed the mechanical consequences for having/changing it. So you don't suffer any XP or level loss when you change alignment, nor do you become eligible/ineligible fo… (View Post)

In AD&D poison is specifically called out as being chaotic rather than evil, but what this thread is pointing out is that *any* damage-dealing can be considered evil depending on the context. (View Post)

I would suggest 0 singleclass warriors, 0 singleclass clerics or druids, 0 singleclass wizards, no more than 1 thief, and at least one sorcerer. Perhaps something like this: FMT (mainly casts defensi… (View Post)