Skip to content

The Gap in the Twin-Line Formation

HaHaCharadeHaHaCharade Member Posts: 1,644
edited April 2017 in Baldur's Gate: Enhanced Edition
Okay...

This one has always been there, but I started playing again and it gets to me. Not sure if its a bug... or just annoying... or just me.

Has anyone else noticed the gap that continually occurs in the twin-line formation? I don't think this gap existed in the original, and for some with obsessive tendencies, like myself, it drives me nuts. I've attached a screen shot so you can see what I mean.

image

See the gap between the first row of 2, and the second row of two?

Here's what it should look like in my opinion.

image

By twin-line formation, I mean the formation of 3 and 3 (far left formation).

Thoughts?
Post edited by HaHaCharade on

Comments

  • Yulaw9460Yulaw9460 Member Posts: 634
    edited November 2018
    Deleted.
    Post edited by Yulaw9460 on
  • argent77argent77 Member Posts: 3,434
    I never really paid attention to these details before, but you are right. There is a gap between the first row and the back rows in two formations:





    However, the same gap can be seen in original BG2 too:





    I don't see anything wrong with it though. The first row is usually reserved for melee fighters, so it's actually a good idea to have a greater gap between the front line and the back.
  • ThacoBellThacoBell Member Posts: 12,235
    I agree with at @argent77 's post, but now it is going to bug me everytime I notice it.
  • HaHaCharadeHaHaCharade Member Posts: 1,644
    @argent77 Wow! I swear it wasn't as noticeable in my original BG, or I would have gone crazy long ago!
  • HaHaCharadeHaHaCharade Member Posts: 1,644
    Yulaw9460 said:

    Well... My immediate thought is that I've never given it any thought. Nor can I remember any time it has been a factor in my party's survival. And I doubt that it has. I use the same formation.

    Not questioning in game use in terms of practicality or party effectiveness, as much as aesthetics.
  • sarevok57sarevok57 Member Posts: 5,975
    hmm interesting, I haven't used that formation in like 16 years, I always use the one that tightens the formation up which is this one:


  • ZaghoulZaghoul Member, Moderator Posts: 3,938
    @HaHaCharade 'The devil is in the details' is an old but valid expression I use sometimes. We tend to notice little things after a while. In the building trade, after a while I would just automatically pick out flaws in construction wherever I went. Same goes for BG it appears, I know it does for me. Good eye on that.
Sign In or Register to comment.

2024 Overhaul Games, a division of Beamdog. © 2024 Hasbro, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Baldur's Gate, Dungeons & Dragons, D&D, Forgotten Realms, Baldur's Gate, Wizards of the Coast and their logos are trademarks of Wizards of the Coast LLC in the U.S.A. and other countries, and are used with permission. Hasbro and its logo are trademarks of Hasbro, Inc. and are used with permission. © 1998 BioWare Corp. All Rights Reserved. BioWare, the BioWare Infinity Engine and the BioWare logo are trademarks of Bioware Corp. Black Isle Studios and the Black Isle Studios logo are trademarks of Interplay Entertainment Corp. Atari and the Atari logo are trademarks owned by Atari Interactive, Inc. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners.