Skip to content

[BUG] Farmers Named Lahl (0914)

KeithSKeithS Member Posts: 623
edited September 2012 in Fixed
Current Behaviour
An error in TotSC that various farmers got mistakenly named Lahl.

Expected Behaviour
They should not be called Lahl but instead ‘Farmer’.

Files altered: farm, farm3, Farm4, farmer

Fixed in: v0626+

Originally found and fixed in: BG1Fixpack
http://forum.baldursgate.com/discussion/858
Post edited by Bhryaen on

Comments

  • TanthalasTanthalas Member Posts: 6,738
  • TanthalasTanthalas Member Posts: 6,738
    edited July 2012
    CONFIRMED NOT FIXED

    @KeithS

    Now instead of all these farmers being called Lahl, they are now called:

    "The captive nymph Ragefest thinks that Ramazith has evil plans in store for the nymph Abela."

    This "name" appears truncated in the tooltip and in full in the chat log when speaking with him.
  • TanthalasTanthalas Member Posts: 6,738
    @KeithS

    Just a Build 0709 update. The "Lahl" farmers are currently called "Attack".
  • AndreaColomboAndreaColombo Member Posts: 5,533
    Looks like the Sword Coast is ridden by a bad case of identity crisis to go with the iron one!
  • SethDavisSethDavis Member Posts: 1,812
    edited July 2012
    This has now been applied to farm.cre farm2.cre farm3.cre farm4.cre farmer.cre farmbe.cre farmwe.cre

    They have also had their secondary name switched to the same string.

    Those in this list that were missing their alignments have also been set

    farmwe.cre has had it's race and class set properly (was wolf wolf is now lycanthrope werewolf)

    They are all still named Attack, but it is a matter of changing one string res.
  • BalquoBalquo Member, Developer Posts: 2,746
    @SethDavis
    I assume just adding this would fix it?
    STRING_SET 24125 ~Farmer~
    @AndreaColombo
    Or maybe this is something you can add manually now?
  • AndreaColomboAndreaColombo Member Posts: 5,533
    @Balquo - I can change string 24125 from "Attack" to "Farmer" but wouldn't that break all instances in which "Attack" should actually show up?
  • BalquoBalquo Member, Developer Posts: 2,746
    @AndreaColombo
    It should't as "Attack" is string 10348.

    24125 was always Farmer (even in vBG1) until something messed it up.

    Suppose Seth can confirm if it is ok to change the string.
  • AndreaColomboAndreaColombo Member Posts: 5,533
  • TanthalasTanthalas Member Posts: 6,738
    @AndreaColombo

    It looks like Seth won't be around for the rest of the week.
  • AndreaColomboAndreaColombo Member Posts: 5,533
  • KeithSKeithS Member Posts: 623
    @AndreaColombo No worries, I handled it. I added a new string for the farmers and changed their cre file to point to that one, so there's no need to change string 24125.
  • Ascension64Ascension64 Member Posts: 560
    Not entirely fixed in build 0907.
    Checked correct for farm.cre farm2.cre farm3.cre farm4.cre farmer.cre farmwe.cre.
    However, not correct for farmbe.cre, which has name Farmer Brun, also given to farmbr.cre.

    This should do the trick.
    COPY_EXISTING ~farmbe.cre~ ~override/farmbe.cre~
    SAY NAME1 #30606
    SAY NAME2 #30606
    BUT_ONLY
  • TanthalasTanthalas Member Posts: 6,738
    Tagging @KeithS for the last fix.
  • SethDavisSethDavis Member Posts: 1,812
    Potentially fixed - The last one has been renamed
  • BalquoBalquo Member, Developer Posts: 2,746
    Confirmed fixed.
  • Avenger_teambgAvenger_teambg Member, Developer Posts: 5,862
    Confirmed fixed: Farmbe is named farmer.
  • TanthalasTanthalas Member Posts: 6,738
    Looks like this one can be finally laid to rest.
  • moody_magemoody_mage Member Posts: 2,054
    I figured that they were all part of an inbred clan where all the males have the same name as their neurons didn't have enough fizzle left in them to come up with a new name...
Sign In or Register to comment.