[BUG] Farmers Named Lahl (0914)
Current Behaviour
An error in TotSC that various farmers got mistakenly named Lahl.
Expected Behaviour
They should not be called Lahl but instead ‘Farmer’.
Files altered: farm, farm3, Farm4, farmer
Fixed in: v0626+
Originally found and fixed in: BG1Fixpack
http://forum.baldursgate.com/discussion/858
An error in TotSC that various farmers got mistakenly named Lahl.
Expected Behaviour
They should not be called Lahl but instead ‘Farmer’.
Files altered: farm, farm3, Farm4, farmer
Fixed in: v0626+
Originally found and fixed in: BG1Fixpack
http://forum.baldursgate.com/discussion/858
Post edited by Bhryaen on
0
Comments
Oh, I guess my Bug report can also be deleted then:
http://forum.baldursgate.com/discussion/798/bug-npc-lahl-has-multiple-clones#latest
@KeithS
Now instead of all these farmers being called Lahl, they are now called:
"The captive nymph Ragefest thinks that Ramazith has evil plans in store for the nymph Abela."
This "name" appears truncated in the tooltip and in full in the chat log when speaking with him.
Just a Build 0709 update. The "Lahl" farmers are currently called "Attack".
They have also had their secondary name switched to the same string.
Those in this list that were missing their alignments have also been set
farmwe.cre has had it's race and class set properly (was wolf wolf is now lycanthrope werewolf)
They are all still named Attack, but it is a matter of changing one string res.
I assume just adding this would fix it? @AndreaColombo
Or maybe this is something you can add manually now?
It should't as "Attack" is string 10348.
24125 was always Farmer (even in vBG1) until something messed it up.
Suppose Seth can confirm if it is ok to change the string.
It looks like Seth won't be around for the rest of the week.
Checked correct for farm.cre farm2.cre farm3.cre farm4.cre farmer.cre farmwe.cre.
However, not correct for farmbe.cre, which has name Farmer Brun, also given to farmbr.cre.
This should do the trick.