The Truth
Chow
Member Posts: 1,192
Just a word of warning: this may shock and disturb you. But I feel that the public must be aware of the horrible truth, lest it will never be changed into the better.
The novelizations are considered more canon than the games.
5
Comments
Thus i'm shadowkeeping my Xan NPC to a fighter and i will also stage a fight where his head is swallowed by a spider!
And as far as I know the majority would rather pretend that the books never existed
C'mon man. Truth might be many things but DEFINITELY what most people believe in is NOT a good truth-marker.
And yes, i know we talk about BG canon, nothing else.
My favorite example: Lathander and Amaunator are (and always were) the same god. Therefore, the eternal followers of Amaunator beneath Athkatla and the ones wiped out at the shadow temple were abandoned... by their lawful good deity. This contradiction arose because the writers of the FR 4e setting hadn't played enough Baldur's Gate: shame on them!
Just think of it like Blazblue: every player's playthrough (including the ones where CHARNAME dies) all happened, and simultaneously... somehow. :P
Example: In Metal Gear Solid either Snake did or did not manage to save Meryl. In MGS2 they never mentioned this directly, but in MGS4 she returns. Therefore the 'canon' of Metal Gear is that she survived and the ending where she dies never happened.
More wordy but this may help: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canon_(fiction)
Since WotC screwed up the lore so badly with 4th ed, for most people, Baldur's gate is canon, not forgotten realms
There are Baldur's Gate NOVELS?!