Skip to content

tob and charname's adoption

This question was briefly brought up in a different thread that was locked, but what's the deal with retcon of Charname's adoption situation in Throne of Bhaal? It doesn't really make sense. It sounds like the High Priestesses of Bhaal were sacrificing all the children when they were born BUT according to forgotten realm timeline Charname is born ~20 years before the game, and Bhaal dies 10 years before the game. If the High Priestesses are killing babies, wouldn't the baby essence just go straight back to not-dead Bhaal?
«1

Comments

  • SionIVSionIV Member Posts: 2,689
    edited June 2013
    That isn't the only glaring flaw in the story. There are dragons and drows that are bhaalspawn too, so how does that work?

    The priestesses sacrificed the children for their bhaal essence, Gorian and his group of harper friends came in to fight the people there for other reasons, them finding the children was more of a suprise. They couldn't take everyone (Sarevok) but Gorian took you and then left.
  • MalicronMalicron Member Posts: 629
    Let's not forget that ToB retroactively means that a good aligned Harper was, for some reason, sleeping with a priestess of Bhaal.
  • SionIVSionIV Member Posts: 2,689
    Malicron said:

    Let's not forget that ToB retroactively means that a good aligned Harper was, for some reason, sleeping with a priestess of Bhaal.

    She might have just been that good? *Wink wink*

  • Lord_TansheronLord_Tansheron Member Posts: 4,212
    edited June 2013
    I believe it wasn't explicitly stated that the children were to be sacrificed THERE AND THEN. They were probably just brought to the temple for safekeeping, and kept ready to be sacrificed at a moment's notice, whenever the time was right. Of course, when exactly that was would have been hard to tell for the Harpers, which is why they went with the better-safe-than-sorry approach and went in harps blazing. The other theory makes sense, too: Harpers were routing Bhaalites on principle, and just happened to find the children there.

    The timeline is an issue, but can be explained in several ways. One possible solution is that Bhaal, foreseeing as he was, started spreading the seed quite some time before his death. While "children" are mentioned at the temple, it doesn't necessarily mean "babies". They could be of many different ages, anything from toddler to teen, really. Another explanation would be that thanks to Bhaal's essence, his children did not develop normally. They may have grown up more quickly, or even much more quickly in the case of long-lived races like elves. Gorion may have deliberately obfuscated that fact and kept CHARNAME oblivious of it, either through clever lies or outright magical deception, to ensure a "normal" childhood/adolescence.

    As for the different races... Bhaal was a god. Even with diminished powers, I'm sure it wouldn't have been terribly difficult for him to approach suitable females of different races in disguise. We know dragons can take humanoid shape, too, so that could solve some of the more... ehm... troubling biological issues. Also, while CHARNAME's mother has been shown as a priestess of Bhaal, that doesn't mean all mothers were. Surely Bhaal would have had an easy time with his followers, but he'd also have wanted to make sure not to put all eggs in one basket (yeah, terrible puns all over). He could have sired offspring all over the place, and then simply had his clergy steal the infants away after birth.

    I'm not an avid follower of "official" FR lore and timelines, but I've never really found it too difficult to come up with reasonable explanations for the BG plot. There are some holes to be sure, but none so glaring that you couldn't explain them away without becoming too outlandish. And when in doubt, remember the One Rule: a wizard did it!
  • SionIVSionIV Member Posts: 2,689
    He couldn't have had a drow or dragon for a child, as they would be babies at the age of 20.
  • KaltzorKaltzor Member Posts: 1,050
    edited June 2013
    Well, ToB is just a big plothole for the most part.

    And I think the longer living races grow up as fast as others... Just get old slower.
  • SionIVSionIV Member Posts: 2,689
    There is no way a dragon is anything but a sprawling little lizard once it's 20 years old. A drow might look in it's teens but it's far from mature. The drow bhaalspawn you meet is very old and wise.
  • KaltzorKaltzor Member Posts: 1,050
    edited June 2013
    Maybe not necessarily old, I mean ever since you stepped out of Candlekeep you've been wanted dead by pretty much everything, I doubt other bhaalspawn outside of a couple of specific ones had it any easier... Maybe she went through something similar and just became powerful enough to survive... The Five were the most powerful bhaalspawn around but I doubt they, except for maybe Abazigal, started out all that powerful...
  • SapphireIce101SapphireIce101 Member Posts: 866
    I think this argument happened somewhere else, and this is the conclusion that people came to in that argument. Bhaal, being a god, really doesn't have the normal sense of time that we do. He probably saw his death centuries before it was going to happen. It just doesn't make sense to do it with the short-living races centuries before his death.
  • SchneidendSchneidend Member Posts: 3,190
    @SionIV
    @SapphireIce101 has the right of it. Bhaal has been sewing the seeds for his return for a long time.
  • SionIVSionIV Member Posts: 2,689
    edited June 2013
    I'm not saying i don't believe you, i would just like to know where you got this piece of information from. It sounds reasonable but i would like to know who mentions it.

    I don't trust wikipedia too much, but this is a quote from there.

    "More importantly, Bhaal foresaw his death and impregnated many mortal women - creating his heirs, the Bhaalspawn"

    I can't seem to find any information that he would have done this for a long time.
  • KaltzorKaltzor Member Posts: 1,050
    How much exactly did Bhaal know of his coming death? I mean, rather than create the Bhaalspawn, he could've always just gotten rid of Cyric before he does anything...
  • SchneidendSchneidend Member Posts: 3,190
    Kaltzor said:

    How much exactly did Bhaal know of his coming death? I mean, rather than create the Bhaalspawn, he could've always just gotten rid of Cyric before he does anything...

    I believe he read that it would transpire on tablets that represent fate itself. Even if he knew Cyric was the culprit, Bhaal was destined to die one way or another by Cyric's hand.
  • SchneidendSchneidend Member Posts: 3,190
    SionIV said:

    I'm not saying i don't believe you, i would just like to know where you got this piece of information from. It sounds reasonable but i would like to know who mentions it.

    I don't trust wikipedia too much, but this is a quote from there.

    "More importantly, Bhaal foresaw his death and impregnated many mortal women - creating his heirs, the Bhaalspawn"

    I can't seem to find any information that he would have done this for a long time.

    Then nothing really contradicts it, either, and the simplest explanation is that he knew his death was coming centuries ahead of time. Occam's Razor.
  • SionIVSionIV Member Posts: 2,689

    SionIV said:

    I'm not saying i don't believe you, i would just like to know where you got this piece of information from. It sounds reasonable but i would like to know who mentions it.

    I don't trust wikipedia too much, but this is a quote from there.

    "More importantly, Bhaal foresaw his death and impregnated many mortal women - creating his heirs, the Bhaalspawn"

    I can't seem to find any information that he would have done this for a long time.

    Then nothing really contradicts it, either, and the simplest explanation is that he knew his death was coming centuries ahead of time. Occam's Razor.
    But where do you get centuries ahead of time? It could have been 10 years, 20 or even 100.
  • ZanathKariashiZanathKariashi Member Posts: 2,869
    edited June 2013
    well...considering Alaundo predicted the Bhaalspawn crisis 1,312 years before the beginning of BG1...yeah....plenty of time to work out a solution, and once Bhaal knew it was going to happen scrying the general time for when it would occur is much easier, and give him the ability to sow his seeds earlier. And who is to say he didn't sire young races, who then proliferated his essence for him (it's likely how incredibly weak bhaalspawn like Gavid came to be), while he continued to spread his essence directly as well.


    Sarevok flat out says he was much older then you, around 8-10 years old at the time of the harper raid, and escaped immediately during the confusion, while you on the other hand were just a helpless infant (Winthorp flat out confirms that Gorion showed up to Candlekeep with you as a baby).

    Of course that statement also doesn't make a whole lot of sense, since they also state that they were just about to start sacrificing when the harpers showed up....making it 10 years before Bhaal even died.


    Keep in mind, ToB was VERY rushed, and it's pretty clear they didn't have enough time for fact checking to ensure the story lined up properly with previous lore.
  • TaylorTwerkTaylorTwerk Member Posts: 79
    @lord_tansheron man I was hoping bhall mounted dragons in their not humanoid phase.
  • 10thLich10thLich Member Posts: 99
    @ those harping on the "there wasn't enough time for X"
    There are different planes of existance, the material planes (e.g. Greyhawk, Eberron or the Forgotten Realms), and several others (Astral, Shadow, Elementals etc.). On some planes the time flows normally, while others have an accellerated or slowed flow of time.

    Which could result in adult dragon Bhaalspawn, if they've lived the majority of their live on a plane with the accellerated time trait.

    10th
  • EdwinEdwin Member Posts: 480
    edited June 2013



    Keep in mind, ToB was VERY rushed, and it's pretty clear they didn't have enough time for fact checking to ensure the story lined up properly with previous lore.


    They should have simply asked Ed Greenwood to write them into or out of a jam. He is the loveliest old hyper-dedicated D&D geek you may ever meet with a level of accessibility that allowed him to graciously converse for a half hour with the likes of me around the time TOB was in the works.
    Post edited by Edwin on
  • SchneidendSchneidend Member Posts: 3,190
    SionIV said:



    But where do you get centuries ahead of time? It could have been 10 years, 20 or even 100.

    I would say the evidence is provided by the "problem" itself. Why assume it's a plot hole when you can just accept that Abazigal is really old and therefore Bhaal had been at this siring plan for a long time?
  • Lord_TansheronLord_Tansheron Member Posts: 4,212
    Keep in mind that it's well within the lore for things to be known at least in some way WELL before they happen. Alaundo's Prophecies for example deal (in part) with the Bhaalspawn crisis and were made over a THOUSAND years before the actual events of BG. It is entirely conceivable that Bhaal, being a god and all, knew of his death for centuries.
  • ReadingRamboReadingRambo Member Posts: 598
    I was never a fan of the mother reveal. Through all of BG and BG 2 I was under the impression that Gorion cared deeply for her and she was deceased. iit could have been left at that. Instead you found out she was a crazy priestess doing crazy stuff. It also kinda messes with your racial choice. A dwarven or elven priestess of Bhaal seems kinda silly.
  • KaltzorKaltzor Member Posts: 1,050
    Well, considering MOST of the Bhaalspawn are humans, I think the developers intended for CHARNAME to be human... But then decided to not limit players to only one race.
  • Lord_TansheronLord_Tansheron Member Posts: 4,212
    @ReadingRambo actually, I don't have a problem with it at all - quite the contrary. I find that DnD, and the fantasy genre in general, tend to generalize way too much in terms of race. You're a dwarf so you are this way, you're an elf, so you are that way. They emphasize race far more than culture, which I've always found problematic. So what, we had a crazy dwarf go off to become a priestess of Bhaal - sounds reasonable! Bhaalites are all sort of crazy fanatics to begin with, I'm sure you can find appropriate... deviants... among members of every race.

    To be honest, I don't really see the whole mother issue as a particularly glaring plot hole. In fact, it's about how I pictured it even before ToB, sans the crazy gathering at the temple. Just some Bhaalite chick being Zeus-ed by Bhaal, nothing to see...
  • ReadingRamboReadingRambo Member Posts: 598
    Good points.. I think I was just disappointed due to the backstory being so different than my preconceived ideas. I always pictured her as a sort of heroine, maybe a Harper. The truth was much different.
  • Lord_TansheronLord_Tansheron Member Posts: 4,212
    I think that's just bias because we tend to see all protagonists as "heroes". Can't blame you in the least, of course, given how biased the whole tone of the series is towards a good-aligned CHARNAME. But even so - alignment is not exactly hereditary, is it? And it's not like there was much time for proper socialization, was there (for CHARNAME at least). Mom could have been anything, really!
  • KaltzorKaltzor Member Posts: 1,050
    edited July 2013

    I think that's just bias because we tend to see all protagonists as "heroes". Can't blame you in the least, of course, given how biased the whole tone of the series is towards a good-aligned CHARNAME. But even so - alignment is not exactly hereditary, is it? And it's not like there was much time for proper socialization, was there (for CHARNAME at least). Mom could have been anything, really!

    Looking at it all, I personally see a Neutral Evil character as the most fitting, the kind that mostly only wants to get his own goals and will use other people to get them... BG1 you want to kill Sarevok, if not for Gorion, but because he keeps sending assassins your way, BG2 there's Irenicus , in ToB there's the five and Amelyssan
  • ZanathKariashiZanathKariashi Member Posts: 2,869
    The only thing you know about your mother prior to ToB is what Gorion told you......while it was pretty manipulative of him to lie about it, he mostly likely did have your best interests in mind for doing so, since as a Harper he was likely trying to steer you towards the Good path.

    And I suppose you could consider them lovers (from a certain point of view).....thrusting his blade into her and becoming a daddy.
  • chbrookschbrooks Member Posts: 86
    Here's how I've interpreted the events. This might or might not jive with the game content:

    -Gorion knew the PC's mother and did have a relationship with her. This was probably made very difficult by her allegiance to Bhaal, but he saw something in her worth trying to redeem.

    -Through his relationship with the PC's mother, Gorion and the Harpers learned about the ritual.

    -The ritual itself happened before Bhaal even died. My guess is that it wasn't so much an attempt to resurrect him but rather to give him the power to be reborn immediately upon his death. In Bhaal's ideal scenario, that would mean that Cyric kills him during the Time of Troubles only to have Bhaal immediately be reborn and be able to take his revenge.

    -Gorion showed up with the Harpers, the ritual was borked, the PC's mother died in battle.

    -Gorion's letter was a Jedi truth where he focused on the goo he saw in the PC's mother and didn't want her allegiance to Bhaal known. His reference to Bhaal forcing himself on her is more his interpretation of the events, believing that Bhaal manipulated her and that she would have turned out very differently had she not become ensnared in his priesthood.

    Essentially, Gorion is Obi-Wan. His words are true...from a certain point of view.
  • ZanathKariashiZanathKariashi Member Posts: 2,869
    edited July 2013
    Nah, directly contradicts in-game information.


    It's pretty clear he's blatantly lying about it, but feels it's the best possible choice, since you've got enough problems to deal with when/if you find out about your real father. The whole conversation feels like he's making it up as he goes (though it requires hindsight to see it, since you don't really have anything to base it on at first).

    While I'm reluctant to use stuff from ToB, since it is pretty inconsistent, she does seem wholly evil in her conversations.


    If they'd just omitted the part about them starting the ritual, we could've instead inferred (or they could've outright stated) that the temple site was just a holding area basically....bringing all the Bhaalspawn attached to their cell together and awaiting for the appointed time to begin the sacrificing....but by mentioning that the ritual of sacrifice (specifically her just about to sacrifice you to Bhaal) was interrupted by the harper attack, that is what messes with the timeline the most since it's way too early. And it can't have happened after the time of troubles, because you came to Candlekeep as an infant 18-19 years before the BG begins.


    And if it didn't matter when they were killed, why let any of them grow up at all?
Sign In or Register to comment.