Which class should I take?
true_shinken
Member Posts: 84
Hey, guys. I'm going to start a new BGEE run preparing for BGEE2. I plan on using all the new NPCs + Imoen in the next game (so, Neera, Rasaad, Dorn, Hexxak and Imoen; I will probably drop Dorn for Sarevok when I get to ToB, though).
I'm just thinking... which class should I take? That setup needs divine magic, so I'm considering a Ranger/Cleric elf, but that's what I used in my last BG1 playthrough (the last one before EE, that is). I like to use my protagonist as a dual wielding melee character, but that just locks me further into Ranger/Cleric.
Any suggestions on what I should do? Is it possible to start as a Swashbuckler then dual to Cleric, as a human? Please help!
I'm just thinking... which class should I take? That setup needs divine magic, so I'm considering a Ranger/Cleric elf, but that's what I used in my last BG1 playthrough (the last one before EE, that is). I like to use my protagonist as a dual wielding melee character, but that just locks me further into Ranger/Cleric.
Any suggestions on what I should do? Is it possible to start as a Swashbuckler then dual to Cleric, as a human? Please help!
0
Comments
EDIT: This remains true even if your base class is the generic version of that class; so if you want prestige class bonuses, you need to make sure to take the prestige as the first class at character creation.
To be honest - I don't like the Cleric/Thief multi/dual class. I don't think it synergizes together well. (My own opinion, some people may disagree)
b) I wouldn't necessarily dwell on having a Thief if you want to use Imoen+Hexxat. Even though Hexxat will probably be an Assassin or heavily invested into hiding and not utility skills, Imoen can be a good Thief. And until you get Imoen, you can use Yoshimo or Jan for thieving abilities.
c) If you like to get a dual-wielding Cleric-type and don't plan on using Anomen, I'd then probably think about getting a F/C multiclass or a F->C dual-class. Preferrably a Berserker, dualled to a Cleric around lvl 7 (to become powerful in BGEE) or later, if you'd dual in BG2EE. Fighters will still get 6 * for weapon proficiencies by level 7 in BGEE (and +1/2 APR at level 7).
Even though - the Cleric kits aren't bad either. Just the F/C is much more powerful in melee.
Thanks everyone for the suggestions! I considered Swashbuckler->Cleric mainly because Swashbucklers get some misc attack/AC bonuses and three pips in dua wield, but it's not worth it if I need to stick to Thief weapons. Fighter->Cleric could work, but I'm not a fan of any of the Fighter kits. I'm now torn between single class Ranger (maybe ellf Stalker) and multiclass Ranger/Cleric.
A Dwarf Fighter/Cleric, Half-elf Ranger/Cleric or Human Berserker->Cleric/Druid would all fit the bill nicely, and all have the potential to become very powerful indeed.
Berserker dualled to Cleric, dual-wielding hammers or flails (FoA) can be an un-killable behemoth in melee fights. (The Berserker's berserk immunities are a godsend+buffs of the Cleric)
...truth is, that you don't need a divine caster, but everything is much harder if you don't have one. (I play on Hard difficulty)
make a run with an Dwarven Defender, one with an dragon disciple, another with a shadowdancer, other with the 2 new monk kits and another with the blackguard kit.
BG2:EE can/should probally introduce even a new kit (that would need to be adapted to BG:EE later) so there's pleny of new stuff to work around !
Initially I was just going to get my current BG1 character, a half-elf Blade, but with Imoen and Neera I'll already have more than enough arcane power.
I think I'll try a Stalker ^^ I always liked Valygar.
But to dual-class a Stalker to a Cleric does not make sense. You can't backstab (THE one reason why to actually choose a Stalker) with Cleric weapons, save the Staff. That would also mean to forego THE other reason to choose a Ranger - to get 2 pips in dual-wielding for free.
Stalkers are cool just the way the are.