Who has right to make Baldur's gate 3 ???
darrenkuo
Member Posts: 366
Sorry ,
i just feel curious in this question ,
Atari hold this right ??? or EA , etc ?
Does it mean anyone that has enough resource , man power and etc.. they can negotiate with above companies then start to make Baldur's gate 3??? (For instance.. Interplay just re-start Black Isle Studio = = ?)
i just feel curious in this question ,
Atari hold this right ??? or EA , etc ?
Does it mean anyone that has enough resource , man power and etc.. they can negotiate with above companies then start to make Baldur's gate 3??? (For instance.. Interplay just re-start Black Isle Studio = = ?)
0
Comments
well, bg is a loved series, and still a source of income. it wouldn't surprise me that after bg 1 and 2 are a success, ea pulls the rug from under beamdog, remakes ps:t and iwd 1 and 2, and bg3, and screws them all up horribly.
but i honestly don't know the politics, just some of the players, mainly who NOT to trust.
To use the Forgotten Realms and D&D they'd have to make a deal with WotC (parent company Hasbro). As to the franchise name(s) and game(s) logos, I wonder if Overhaul/Beamdog already at least has purchased rights to use same.
It doesn't matter.
They're still using the FORGOTTEN REALMS setting, which is of course D&D propriety.
"In August 2008, Interplay and Atari settled a long-standing dispute, giving Atari all of Interplay's previous D&D game rights, including the Baldur's Gate license."
( http://www.videogamer.com/pc/baldurs_gate_2_throne_of_bhaal/news/bioware_on_not_making_baldur_s_gate_3_we_ve_no_regrets.html )
http://company.wizards.com/content/hasbro-and-atari-resolve-dungeons-dragons-rights-dispute
Now the BG video game franchise... I'm not as certain on that one since not all of the terms of that settlement were made public. My guess is that Beamdog probably knows better than we do on that score.