Where are you from and what do you prefer?
Dougie
Member Posts: 34
I am interested in where people are from and how the feel about changes to the game.
- Where are you from and what do you prefer?59 votes
- I'm European & game improvements are more important than being true to the storyline33.90%
- I'm European & being true to the storyline is more important than improvements20.34%
- I'm N. American & game improvements are more important than being true to the storyline  6.78%
- I'm N. American & being true to the storyline is more important than improvements27.12%
- I'm from elsewhere & game improvements are more important than being true to the storyline10.17%
- I'm from elsewhere & being true to the storyline is more important than improvements  1.69%
1
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
The story that was originally written in 1998 needs to be maintained. This means that the characters' personalities need to be the same, the plot points need to remain the same, and that's pretty much it.
Engine-side, the game should still play like Baldur's Gate, because players should be able to jump right into the game knowing what the mechanics are and what to expect.
Beyond that, I'm more or less open to ideas and concepts. I usually install at least a few mods (Item Revisions is one of my favorites), and if there's something that makes sense to implement (see also, "reduce the gold destruction wild surge effect to a percentage so that it doesn't risk a no-solution scenario for BG2"), then I'm usually a fan of improving on what was released fourteen years ago.
New content is always a plus, as long as it doesn't contradict the old content. That means new NPCs, new side quests for existing NPCs, and so on. I'm not so much a fan of bringing old NPCs back to life after the story has been written with the assumption that they're dead (for instance).
Improvement is an improvement, whether it alters the storyline or not. I'm all for improvements, but that doesn't mean that the story or characters should be changed unnecessarily.
While I love the storyline (BG1 & SoA, ToB not so much), it has its weak spots and it's hardly above criticism - and it could be improved in any number of ways. But it goes without saying that not every change is an improvement.
I can understand that many in their nostalgia want to experience what they experienced some fourteen years ago - has it really been that long? - but wouldn't it be great to have something that's familiar yet has some new flavour that makes it even better? If you only ever want more of the same, you'll never get to experience anything greater.
Then again, we already know that Overhaul isn't going to touch the story...
I'm from Europe. I can't help it, please forgive me.
P.S.
My first post here, so I hereby declare myself warmly welcome to this forum! I'm a BG1 veteran, and I'm excited for the Enhanced Edition.
Also, eat more cheese.
You're right, not all changes would affect the storyline, but some might, and I wanted to test out something I detected in another discussion
Again, you're right, not all improvement would affect the storyline, but in the event that they might, I wanted to test an idea.
I think I may have discovered the cause of some of our earlier disagreement. If these early results in this poll are maintained, it lloks as though we were looking at the whole idea of the purpose of improving the game from different perspectives.
Even if the current pattern doesn't continue, on geographical lines, it is at least clear that different people have different approaches to what a role playing game is, and different attitudes to what is and isn't permissible from the process of improvement.
So, sorry for being at crossed purposes earlier
In any case, I don't see what being North American or European has to do with it. I'm all for gameplay enhancements and for adding new content. I'm not in favor of completely rewriting entire characters on a whim.
Also, your poll is slanted. The fact that most of the people voting here have had to clarify what they meant should tell you something.
But now after your (@Dougle) explanation I'm taking part with your strange experiment. I hope you get enough of statistical population to get decent results. Will you share your results with public?
Thank you for your patience and your open-mindedness.
If I'm wrong, everyone can be assured that they play the game in the same way general way, with the same kind of expectations, and that would probably indicate that developers only have to satisfy one constituency of views in the changes that they make to the game.
However, if my hunch is correct, the results will tell the story themselves, and it could indicate that the developers may need to think about different expectations from different populations, which is a challenge, but not impossible to resolve. Listening only to the needs of those who feel most strongly about a particular issue may mean that they fail to satisfy many who approach the game in a different way.
There may be other group differences, such as male v female, but this is the aspect that got me thinking.
I'm pretty sure the geographical question was just to make this poll seem different. >_>