This is why I prefer to solo the first 6 levels
Soido
Member Posts: 338
Because the level progression with a full party is just so slow. And the enemies can easily kill weak low-HP characters.
I find it much faster and easier to start with a barbarian or berserker and quickly solo up to 32 000 XP. Then add a full party. Then it is much more enjoyable playing with a full leveled party without constantly throwing dice if your character will survive or not throughout each single encounter in Chapters 1,2 or 3 because you see his HP is so low.
I find it much faster and easier to start with a barbarian or berserker and quickly solo up to 32 000 XP. Then add a full party. Then it is much more enjoyable playing with a full leveled party without constantly throwing dice if your character will survive or not throughout each single encounter in Chapters 1,2 or 3 because you see his HP is so low.
0
Comments
Oh by the way, my party will be among Branwen, Coran, Edwin, Kivan, Dorn.
Not to undermine the solo enthusiasts. Try soloing with monk and you know how hard that would be, if not tougher than full party. But yeah I admit that these 2 particular classes, the Berserker and the Barbarian, are capable of soloing very easily, and somewhat break the game.
I think my preferences are Solo With Grinding (the Nashkel Mines can hell for low level solo players, with so many archers in tight quarters to avoid) and Party No Grinding (because Quest EXP is so much better for party play even in BG1 where it's divided up).
But, personally, I love having to take on things like kobolds in the mines, the xvarts, gibberlings and gnolls in the wilds when they present a challenge.