Skip to content

[Not an Issue] Armor class bonus/penalty bug?

FAButzkeFAButzke Member Posts: 29
edited October 2014 in BGII:EE Bugs (v1.2.2030)
I've noticed something strange regarding shields and their bonuses to armor class.
Bucklers provide no AC bonus against piercing and missile damage, correct?
Small shields provide no AC bonus against missile damage, correct?
The Shield of Harmony should provide a +2 AC penalty to missile damage, correct?

Now I'm having a hard time explaning this:

Using the Shadow Dragon Scale (without any shields or any other AC enhancing items), my bonus to AC are as follow (reading the AC Modifiers ingame):

-1 Missile
-1 Piercing
-2 Slashing

Which makes sense, since the armor description states that I gain those bonuses. If I toss a small shield into the mix, it reads:

-1 Piercing
-2 Slashing

It seems I lost the -1 Missile protection from the armor. Which DOESN'T make sense.

If I toss a bucker it reads:

-2 Slashing.

I've lost now the Missile and the Piercing bonus from the armor.

If I use the Shield of Harmony, it reads:

+2 Missile
-1 Piercing
-2 Slashing.

Now, not only I've lost the missile bonus from the armor, but it introduced a penalty of +2 from the shield.

I don't know if this is intended or not, but even if it is intended, it's still odd. It seems like the game 'resets' the bonus in order to calculate the penalties applied when using shields. In this last example (of the Shield of Harmony) the correct readout should be: +1 Missile (Since the armor gives -1 and the shield gives +2)

Am I right or am I crazy here?
Post edited by Gate70 on

Comments

  • FAButzkeFAButzke Member Posts: 29
    edited October 2014
    A sidenote: Using the Shield of Falling Stars, the bonus is calculated correctly:

    -5 Missile
    -1 Piercing
    -2 Slashing

    The shield gives +4 bonus AC to Missile, so -5 is correct here (-1 from the armor -4 from the shield)
    So, it seems the problem is when penalties are introduced. Bonuses are calculated correctly.
  • kjeronkjeron Member Posts: 2,367
    edited October 2014
    Your forgetting to look at your base AC amount, it should be increasing(decreasing) as well.
    Small Shields add their AC bonus by giving a generic +1AC and a -1 Missile AC.
    Buckler's add their AC bonus by giving a generic +1AC and a -1 Piercing/Missile AC.

    Shield of Harmony is a small shield, and it is missing the line in its description stating that it provides no protection against missile AC.

    BASE/MISSILE/PIERCE/SLASH/CRUSH
    Shadow Dragon Scale is:
    1/-1/-1/-2/-0

    Adding a Small Shield:
    -1/+1/-0/-0/-0
    1/-1/-1/-2/-0
    becomes:
    0/-/-1/-2/-

    Adding a Buckler:
    -1/+1/+1/-0/-0
    1/-1/-1/-2/-0
    becomes:
    0/-/-/-2/-

    Adding the Shield of Harmony:
    -3/+3/-0/-0/-0
    1/-1/-1/-2/-0
    becomes:
    -2/+2/-1/-2/-
  • FAButzkeFAButzke Member Posts: 29
    edited October 2014
    Thanks, so I was crazy. That makes more sense. So the shield does indeed "cancel" the armor bonus for sake of a lower (overall) base AC. For some reason, I thought that adding a shield should keep the armor bonus AS WELL as lowering your base AC. Turns out the small shield, not only does not protect against missiles, but gives you a penalty (cancelling the armor bonus) as well. I also thought the Shield of Harmony gave a +2 penalty not a +3 (even the wiki is wrong then).

    As a sidenote, shouldn't the item descriptions for small shields and bucklers be more clear in that respect? I mean, they say that both give no protection, when, in fact, what they give is a penalty to missile and piercing AC respectively.

    Thanks again. Do I have to rename the title to "not an issue" or a mod will take care of that?
  • TJ_HookerTJ_Hooker Member Posts: 2,438
    FAButzke said:

    As a sidenote, shouldn't the item descriptions for small shields and bucklers be more clear in that respect? I mean, they say that both give no protection, when, in fact, what they give is a penalty to missile and piercing AC respectively.

    They're not giving a penalty though. If you equip a small shield, your AC vs missiles will not become worse. It will be exactly the same as if you had no shield equipped, which is what you'd expect based on the item description.
  • FAButzkeFAButzke Member Posts: 29
    You have a point there. My mistake and apologies for wasting everybody's time =)
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 0
    edited October 2014
    The user and all related content has been deleted.
  • FAButzkeFAButzke Member Posts: 29
    You're right, of course. The sad part is that I should know this stuff. I've been playing BG since 2001... (sigh) =D
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 0
    The user and all related content has been deleted.
  • kjeronkjeron Member Posts: 2,367
    You did still find an actual issue, if only a minor description error.
    Shield of Harmony is missing its "No protection against missile attacks" line.
    It's also missing from both versions of Shield of Reflection (SHLD24/A).
  • JalilyJalily Member Posts: 4,681
    I've added the missing line to the descriptions for those shields. Thanks.
Sign In or Register to comment.

2024 Overhaul Games, a division of Beamdog. © 2024 Hasbro, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Baldur's Gate, Dungeons & Dragons, D&D, Forgotten Realms, Baldur's Gate, Wizards of the Coast and their logos are trademarks of Wizards of the Coast LLC in the U.S.A. and other countries, and are used with permission. Hasbro and its logo are trademarks of Hasbro, Inc. and are used with permission. © 1998 BioWare Corp. All Rights Reserved. BioWare, the BioWare Infinity Engine and the BioWare logo are trademarks of Bioware Corp. Black Isle Studios and the Black Isle Studios logo are trademarks of Interplay Entertainment Corp. Atari and the Atari logo are trademarks owned by Atari Interactive, Inc. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners.