Skip to content

Help me choose - F/M dual class or multiclass?

ProteusProteus Member Posts: 40
edited December 2014 in Icewind Dale: Enhanced Edition
I'm creating a Fighter/Mage to use primarily as a backline archer + mage.

Am I better off going dual class (Fighter 9/Mage X) or just choosing Elf and going multiclass?

Edit: I am playing with a 4 man party, and intend to go through HoF eventually.

Comments

  • FinneousPJFinneousPJ Member Posts: 6,455
    Depends on game mode. In normal mode I would probably choose the multi due to slower XP gain. In HoF the dual is easier to pull off.
  • ProteusProteus Member Posts: 40
    FinneousPJ said:

    Depends on game mode. In normal mode I would probably choose the multi due to slower XP gain. In HoF the dual is easier to pull off.

    Oh right, forgot to mention. I am using a 4 person party and intend to play HoF after a normal run.
  • FinneousPJFinneousPJ Member Posts: 6,455
    So you're going to do a normal run followed by a HoF run with the same party? I'd do multi in that case.
  • WowoWowo Member Posts: 2,064
    I don't see any benefit to the multiclass. In fact, for an archer, I don't see much benefit to going past level 7 fighter (for a nice round amount of attacks per round. Just for proficienes make sure that you level to wizard 5 and then don't take another wizard level until you have enough xp for wizard 8 so that you can get Grandmastery in bows with your level 6 pip.

    You'll appreciate the higher damage and better spell casting infinitely more for a vast majority of the game, especially if you plan on 2 runs.
  • ZyzzogetonZyzzogeton Member Posts: 526
    Dual.

    I'd only Multi for a utility class (Thief, Cleric) and only in non-HoF. And even then it depends on the rest of your party.
  • WanderonWanderon Member Posts: 1,418
    I love the elf multi for both F/M and F/T especially with the + 1 to bows and long swords - I have one of each in my current party - both are great archers and I get to use their mage and thief classes for the entire game and their fighter classes continue to upgrade for the whole game.
  • RedrakeRedrake Member Posts: 426
    Wanderon said:

    I love the elf multi for both F/M and F/T especially with the + 1 to bows and long swords - I have one of each in my current party - both are great archers and I get to use their mage and thief classes for the entire game and their fighter classes continue to upgrade for the whole game.

    +1 thac0 is all very good, but that -1 Con really hurts them as multiclass fighters. I'd rather go for a half-elf.

  • jackjackjackjack Member Posts: 3,251
    Redrake said:

    Wanderon said:

    I love the elf multi for both F/M and F/T especially with the + 1 to bows and long swords - I have one of each in my current party - both are great archers and I get to use their mage and thief classes for the entire game and their fighter classes continue to upgrade for the whole game.

    +1 thac0 is all very good, but that -1 Con really hurts them as multiclass fighters. I'd rather go for a half-elf.

    But on an Archer, -1 Con isn't nearly as much of a problem as it would be on a front-liner.
  • WanderonWanderon Member Posts: 1,418
    jackjack said:

    Redrake said:

    Wanderon said:

    I love the elf multi for both F/M and F/T especially with the + 1 to bows and long swords - I have one of each in my current party - both are great archers and I get to use their mage and thief classes for the entire game and their fighter classes continue to upgrade for the whole game.

    +1 thac0 is all very good, but that -1 Con really hurts them as multiclass fighters. I'd rather go for a half-elf.

    But on an Archer, -1 Con isn't nearly as much of a problem as it would be on a front-liner.
    And the 90% resistance to charm & sleep spells vs 30% for half-elf might come into play as well...
  • ZyzzogetonZyzzogeton Member Posts: 526
    Fighter duals can easily hit things with buffs. They already provide Emotion Hope and Courage

    A Cleric will drive THAC0 even lower.

    Enemies in this game don't have a abysmally low AC values.
  • ProteusProteus Member Posts: 40
    edited December 2014
    Wowo said:

    I don't see any benefit to the multiclass. In fact, for an archer, I don't see much benefit to going past level 7 fighter (for a nice round amount of attacks per round. Just for proficienes make sure that you level to wizard 5 and then don't take another wizard level until you have enough xp for wizard 8 so that you can get Grandmastery in bows with your level 6 pip.

    You'll appreciate the higher damage and better spell casting infinitely more for a vast majority of the game, especially if you plan on 2 runs.

    Don't I get another 1/2 attack at Fighter 9? Which is why I'm dualing at that level. Or does this not affect bows?

    Also, I'm allowed to delay leveling to save for proficiency slots?
  • FinneousPJFinneousPJ Member Posts: 6,455
    @Proteus No, you get attacks at 7 and 13.
  • WowoWowo Member Posts: 2,064
    Proteus said:

    Wowo said:

    I don't see any benefit to the multiclass. In fact, for an archer, I don't see much benefit to going past level 7 fighter (for a nice round amount of attacks per round. Just for proficienes make sure that you level to wizard 5 and then don't take another wizard level until you have enough xp for wizard 8 so that you can get Grandmastery in bows with your level 6 pip.

    You'll appreciate the higher damage and better spell casting infinitely more for a vast majority of the game, especially if you plan on 2 runs.

    Don't I get another 1/2 attack at Fighter 9? Which is why I'm dualing at that level. Or does this not affect bows?

    Also, I'm allowed to delay leveling to save for proficiency slots?
    Bonus attacks @7 and 13 as mentioned. 9 is the quickest level for Grandmastery but you can get it at wizard 8 anyway by saving your xp and jumping directly from wizard 5 to wizard 8.

    Usual reason to go to 9 (or 13) in IWD is if you have the kensei kit and are playing a level 1 HoF party.
  • ProteusProteus Member Posts: 40
    edited December 2014
    Wowo said:



    Bonus attacks @7 and 13 as mentioned. 9 is the quickest level for Grandmastery but you can get it at wizard 8 anyway by saving your xp and jumping directly from wizard 5 to wizard 8.

    Usual reason to go to 9 (or 13) in IWD is if you have the kensei kit and are playing a level 1 HoF party.

    Ok I have a different question now. I was intending to make a Berserker(13)/Mage(X) for melee. I chose 13 because that's the level I got to with my Kensai/Mage in BG2. Am I better off dualing at another level with Berserker?
  • FinneousPJFinneousPJ Member Posts: 6,455
    The only downside to 13 is the massive XP cost. You have to decide if it's worth it.
  • WowoWowo Member Posts: 2,064
    Proteus said:

    Wowo said:



    Bonus attacks @7 and 13 as mentioned. 9 is the quickest level for Grandmastery but you can get it at wizard 8 anyway by saving your xp and jumping directly from wizard 5 to wizard 8.

    Usual reason to go to 9 (or 13) in IWD is if you have the kensei kit and are playing a level 1 HoF party.

    Ok I have a different question now. I was intending to make a Berserker(13)/Mage(X) for melee. I chose 13 because that's the level I got to with my Kensai/Mage in BG2. Am I better off dualing at another level with Berserker?
    Probably not worth it. For a berserker/Mage you'll probably get the most enjoyment from a berserker 7/Mage as you end up with the same amount of attacks in almost all situations which is the main reason to go to 13 usually.

    If you did want to go to 13 I'd recommend a kensei. I have a kensei 13/Mage in my level 1 HoF party and she's done pretty great. Main reason I didn't dual her at 9 (a good break point for kensei for the extra damage) is because I had 2 other kensei dualing at 9 so she stayed to provide the damage while they were finishing the dual.

    Overall though even with a kensei 13/Mage in a fast leveling HoF party I can't honestly say that it was worth it. Berserker 7 or kensei 9 duals are where it's at.

    Be warned that with such a party you'll probably find that it's too easy once the duals are completed.

  • ZyzzogetonZyzzogeton Member Posts: 526
    edited December 2014
    Having a Fighter makes the game easy period as long as the Mages (preferrably Sorcerers) and Clerics are casting the right spells.

    Kensai bonuses are good but they're just another bonus when you factor in all the bonuses the game lets you pile up on Fighters.

    And since this is Normal Mode, even a Sorc with 18 STR and 18/19 DEX using slings already performs ridiculously well. A Fighter with proficiencies and Fighter APR is going to melt things. Although as far as Normal Mode is concerned, damage spells are usually better most of the time.
  • MrGoodkatMrGoodkat Member Posts: 167
    If you don't plan on using your character in melee, Fighter 7 / Mage X is probably the way to go from a purely powergaming point of view. Maybe Fighter 9 if you want to go straight for Grandmastery without having to squat Mage levels later on.

    Is your party already set in stone? If not you might want to consider going for a pure Archer instead. These guys are *insanely* strong. The only things is a bit of a pain in the ass in IWD:EE is the lack of an unlimited source of +1/+2 arrows.
  • ProteusProteus Member Posts: 40
    MrGoodkat said:

    If you don't plan on using your character in melee, Fighter 7 / Mage X is probably the way to go from a purely powergaming point of view. Maybe Fighter 9 if you want to go straight for Grandmastery without having to squat Mage levels later on.

    Is your party already set in stone? If not you might want to consider going for a pure Archer instead. These guys are *insanely* strong. The only things is a bit of a pain in the ass in IWD:EE is the lack of an unlimited source of +1/+2 arrows.

    Arrows are limited? That's not good news - I originally intended to have 2 ranged characters seeing how there are an abundance of good bows in the game. Would you recommend another type of ranged weapon to deal with the ammo issues?
  • WowoWowo Member Posts: 2,064
    I'd recommend roughly 3 front liners and 3 ranged. Of those 3 ranged I'd more lean towards casting spells rather than actually using a ranged weapon.

    For a normal run I'd suggest some combination of Skald, bard, Avenger Druid, Archer, Sorcerer or Fighter 7/Mage for the back line.

    For HoF it's a bit different and there's a whole thread with ideas.

    I wouldn't do 2 runs with the same party. Each run would just end up too easy. Instead I'd suggest to make a core appropriate party and play core. Then you can make a HoF appropriate party and run HoF.
  • jackjackjackjack Member Posts: 3,251
    Proteus said:

    Would you recommend another type of ranged weapon to deal with the ammo issues?

    I would. I have an Archer firing arrows and an Illusionist/Thief firing bolts. It's worked very well so far. I had a Bard wielding a shortbow for a bit, but ever since he bought the Lyre of Progression, that bow sits in his inventory.
  • MrGoodkatMrGoodkat Member Posts: 167
    Proteus said:

    MrGoodkat said:

    If you don't plan on using your character in melee, Fighter 7 / Mage X is probably the way to go from a purely powergaming point of view. Maybe Fighter 9 if you want to go straight for Grandmastery without having to squat Mage levels later on.

    Is your party already set in stone? If not you might want to consider going for a pure Archer instead. These guys are *insanely* strong. The only things is a bit of a pain in the ass in IWD:EE is the lack of an unlimited source of +1/+2 arrows.

    Arrows are limited? That's not good news - I originally intended to have 2 ranged characters seeing how there are an abundance of good bows in the game. Would you recommend another type of ranged weapon to deal with the ammo issues?
    Enchanted arrows, yes. Definitely would recommend to take another type of weapon for your other ranged character.
  • ProteusProteus Member Posts: 40
    Alright so after some consideration I've decided to modify my party to instead include a Thief (9)/Mage (X) dual class using crossbows, and a single class Archer using longbows. Thanks for all the replies people.
  • WowoWowo Member Posts: 2,064
    Proteus said:

    Alright so after some consideration I've decided to modify my party to instead include a Thief (9)/Mage (X) dual class using crossbows, and a single class Archer using longbows. Thanks for all the replies people.

    I have a similar build but I used the assassin kit for that oh so awesome poison weapon ability on ranged attacks. Little bit tricky to cap out all necessary skills but it's doable. Don't need hide/ms with 3e sneak attack active. Single weapon style and the new katana combined with sneak attack is actually really fun and engaging.
  • ameliabogginsameliaboggins Member Posts: 287
    edited December 2014
    its situational, but i find my F/M/Thief can kill most things.

    only really tuff mobs or grps that i bother to pull the mobs back to the grp.

    the tap heal shortsword from burial isle is great for tanking with.....rarely dips under 70% health.

    Add in the robe from malavon(imm to confusion) and hes my main char for killing underhulks.

    Not my main tank, but decent melee dps. [4APR unhasted] Lower hps might put some off...
Sign In or Register to comment.

2024 Overhaul Games, a division of Beamdog. © 2024 Hasbro, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Baldur's Gate, Dungeons & Dragons, D&D, Forgotten Realms, Baldur's Gate, Wizards of the Coast and their logos are trademarks of Wizards of the Coast LLC in the U.S.A. and other countries, and are used with permission. Hasbro and its logo are trademarks of Hasbro, Inc. and are used with permission. © 1998 BioWare Corp. All Rights Reserved. BioWare, the BioWare Infinity Engine and the BioWare logo are trademarks of Bioware Corp. Black Isle Studios and the Black Isle Studios logo are trademarks of Interplay Entertainment Corp. Atari and the Atari logo are trademarks owned by Atari Interactive, Inc. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners.