Skip to content

Quayle vs Xzar as a Mage/cleric

Which is better out of this two?

Comments

  • BlackravenBlackraven Member Posts: 3,486
    My two cents:

    We're only talking BG1 here, since neither character returns as a playable NPC in BG2.

    Xzar has the advantage of higher intelligence than Quayle, meaning he's more likely to succesfully copy spells (or at least needs fewer potions to be sure of success). He also has better wisdom, and thus more divine spells than Quayle.
    A drawback for Xzar is that he needs to dual at level 6 at the latest, in order for him to get his mage abilities back (Necromancer 6 -> Cleric 7). Consequently, he won't gain access to level 4 arcane spells, whereas Quayle will end up as a level 7/7 Cleric/Illusionist, with one more level 2 arcane spell than Xzar and with two level 4 arcane spells. Also, in my opinion, Illusionism has more useful low level spells (Blindness, Spook, Invisibility, Blur, Mirror Image) imo than Necromancy (Horror and Skull Trap).
    Quayle also has the advantage of being a multiclass, so he'll be a Cleric/Illusionist, able to cast both arcane and divine spells throughout the entire game, whereas Xzar will have the inconvenience of not being able to cast his mage spells for some time.

    In sum: Xzar will end up being the better Cleric (with more divine spells), while Quayle will be the better wizard (with more and more useful arcane spells).
  • JeymzJeymz Member Posts: 11
    @Blackraven thanks for replying man
  • JuliusBorisovJuliusBorisov Member, Administrator, Moderator, Developer Posts: 22,725
    Also, the shorty saving throw bonuses. Quayle gets them, even with his stats, and they help a lot. -2 bonus to Wand and Spell saving throws plus additional Constitution-based -3 bonuses to to Death, Wand, and Spell saving throws. His special ability is a quick casting invisibility spell.
  • lunarlunar Member Posts: 3,460
    bengoshi said:

    Also, the shorty saving throw bonuses. Quayle gets them, even with his stats, and they help a lot. -2 bonus to Wand and Spell saving throws plus additional Constitution-based -3 bonuses to to Death, Wand, and Spell saving throws. His special ability is a quick casting invisibility spell.

    Umm gnomes don't get bonus to save vs paralyse/poison/death as halflings and dwarves do. IIRC. They still get bonus to save vs spells and wands, however, and thus are still awesome. Quayle has a very good save vs death anyway, being a cleric.

  • JeymzJeymz Member Posts: 11
    do you think that quayle can play as a Fighter/mage role even though he is a cleric/illusionist or is there a better npc who does fighter/mage better?
  • WowoWowo Member Posts: 2,064
    Jeymz said:

    do you think that quayle can play as a Fighter/mage role even though he is a cleric/illusionist or is there a better npc who does fighter/mage better?

    Theoretically yes but in practical terms the cleric buffs that make him a viable melee combatant are of too short duration with the bg1 xp cap.

    Much better to use him as a primary caster at which he is one of the best available.
  • JuliusBorisovJuliusBorisov Member, Administrator, Moderator, Developer Posts: 22,725
    lunar said:

    bengoshi said:

    Also, the shorty saving throw bonuses. Quayle gets them, even with his stats, and they help a lot. -2 bonus to Wand and Spell saving throws plus additional Constitution-based -3 bonuses to to Death, Wand, and Spell saving throws. His special ability is a quick casting invisibility spell.

    Umm gnomes don't get bonus to save vs paralyse/poison/death as halflings and dwarves do. IIRC. They still get bonus to save vs spells and wands, however, and thus are still awesome. Quayle has a very good save vs death anyway, being a cleric.

    Don't they? Ok, I'll learn it. I thought their "no death saving throw" thing was only with innate bonuses, not additional CON-based bonuses.
  • The user and all related content has been deleted.
  • fireandsteel73fireandsteel73 Member Posts: 31

    My two cents:

    We're only talking BG1 here, since neither character returns as a playable NPC in BG2.

    I think that speaks volumes :)

  • moody_magemoody_mage Member Posts: 2,054
    Quayle is a useless annoying twerp. Xzar is awesome. There is no contest, mechanical differences be damned.
  • sarevok57sarevok57 Member Posts: 5,975
    remember that if you even want to dual class Xzar into a cleric you will have to give him one of the tomes of wisdom to do so, because you need 17 of the prime stat you are dual classing into to be able to dual class, and Xzar only has 16 WIS, but another route if you want to take it is Dynaheir as well, she has 15 WIS which means you have to give her 2 tomes to do it, but then you could have an invoker instead of a necromancer depending on what specialist school you like better
Sign In or Register to comment.