I got in BG:EE a 98 in 5 minutes with my first character but never a 100 in the BG series. You need to pick a class with high requirements (ranger or paladin) to get a better chance to get a 100.
I got in BG:EE a 98 in 5 minutes with my first character but never a 100 in the BG series. You need to pick a class with high requirements (ranger or paladin) to get a better chance to get a 100.
"pure envy" -_- I'm rolling kensai/cleric dual so not much of a choice, but I'm at work now so it's not like I'm wasting time that much tho
Nope. But i rolled a 98 with a fighter, which is quite insane. Especially useful since i plan to dual him into mage in BG2 (im playing BGT atm, since EE is so bugged).
Nope. But i rolled a 98 with a fighter, which is quite insane. Especially useful since i plan to dual him into mage in BG2 (im playing BGT atm, since EE is so bugged).
Someone mentioned today that he managed to import BGEE char into BG2 without any modifications, and yes rolling fighters is a pure torture.
I got a 100 on the nose with my berserker. crappy str/xx though: 18/07. It took a long time. I wanted to make a dual class to druid, so I just popped in a movie while I rolled.
@AlexDeLarge Technically he didn't roll 100, he rolled 102 OP asked if anyone ever rolled a hundred.
Is that even possible? It was a long time ago so the 12 may have been a 10, but I'm pretty sure it was a 12. I had 18 everything but int. Rangers are usually pretty easy to get at least 4 18s.
I got a 100 on the nose with my berserker. crappy str/xx though: 18/07. It took a long time. I wanted to make a dual class to druid, so I just popped in a movie while I rolled.
@AlexDeLarge Technically he didn't roll 100, he rolled 102 OP asked if anyone ever rolled a hundred.
You're correct, @UnknownQuantity talks off-topic . My OCD craves his roll though P_P
Twice, I think. I remember a crazy high roll with a paladin back in the original game. It might have been a 99, but I'm pretty sure it was in the 100-102 range.
Got a 100 for sure a couple weeks ago trying out an autoroller. I started it before I went to sleep and left it running overnight - didn't get back to my laptop until about 8:00 PM the next day... Took one look at the triple digit score and said, "Yep, that'll do!" I'm sure plenty of people would consider that cheating, but I won't lose any sleep over it (literally, the auto-roller allows me to roll in my sleep).
Too bad there's nothing gained in rolling a 90 vs 100.
That's certainly not true.
It depends on the class, sure, but there's quite a difference between a 90 and a 100 for, say, a Gnome Cleric/Illusionist. 18/18/18/19/17/10 vs. 15/18/18/19/17/3.
Oh, and as to the original topic, I've had two 100(+) characters, though one was a Fighter started in BG2, so he never got the stat books, which I've always felt was a shame. (I am tempted to just use SK to recreate him in BG:EE.) The other I haven't played yet. (He's a Ranger, total 101, with 18/17 Str.)
Comments
I'm rolling kensai/cleric dual so not much of a choice, but I'm at work now so it's not like I'm wasting time that much tho
@AlexDeLarge
Technically he didn't roll 100, he rolled 102
Got a 100 for sure a couple weeks ago trying out an autoroller. I started it before I went to sleep and left it running overnight - didn't get back to my laptop until about 8:00 PM the next day... Took one look at the triple digit score and said, "Yep, that'll do!" I'm sure plenty of people would consider that cheating, but I won't lose any sleep over it (literally, the auto-roller allows me to roll in my sleep).
It depends on the class, sure, but there's quite a difference between a 90 and a 100 for, say, a Gnome Cleric/Illusionist. 18/18/18/19/17/10 vs. 15/18/18/19/17/3.
Oh, and as to the original topic, I've had two 100(+) characters, though one was a Fighter started in BG2, so he never got the stat books, which I've always felt was a shame. (I am tempted to just use SK to recreate him in BG:EE.) The other I haven't played yet. (He's a Ranger, total 101, with 18/17 Str.)