[BUG] Yeslick Looping Action
Current Behaviour
During Cloakwood Mines, Yeslick can go through a loop of joining and leaving the party under certain circumstances.
Expected Behaviour
He should not automatically leave and join repeatedly.
Files altered: yeslick.bcs, yeslij.dlg
Fixed in: v0626+
Originally found and fixed in: BG1Fixpack
http://forum.baldursgate.com/discussion/858
During Cloakwood Mines, Yeslick can go through a loop of joining and leaving the party under certain circumstances.
Expected Behaviour
He should not automatically leave and join repeatedly.
Files altered: yeslick.bcs, yeslij.dlg
Fixed in: v0626+
Originally found and fixed in: BG1Fixpack
http://forum.baldursgate.com/discussion/858
Post edited by Tanthalas on
0
Comments
This isn't fixed.
I had no problems with Yeslick in Build0615, but once I loaded my save files with Build0629 this loop starts.
@Tanthalas
I know the devs have said they want the former saves to be backward compatible, but I wouldn't put too much stake in it. It's not as if Build0607 is anything but history now, and there are no players out there who will require 0607-compatibility. I'll test this with a new 0629 game in a bit to help verify, but do you know what gets Yeslick loopy?
http://www.gamebanshee.com/forums/baldurs-gate-20/very-annoying-yeslick-bug-57842.html
http://www.sorcerers.net/forums/showthread.php?t=761
http://www.sorcerers.net/forums/showthread.php?t=1841
http://www.gog.com/en/forum/baldurs_gate_series/any_way_to_fix_the_yeslick_bug
After I updated to 0629, any of my old save files that I load where Yeslick is in my party immediately starts the loop.
But when I get home I'll try this using a new save file and check if the loop starts.
It was immediately upon recruiting him. I had to leave for work so I couldn't meddle or research more helpfully. For sure I'd like to try snatching the key from Ankhegaeorn (jk) first so I could try to flood the mines with Yes and see if it breaks the loop. Would take a lot of coordination navigating Yeslick to the quest locations and through dialog with the plug miner with Yes' interruptions. Never happened to me before though.
@KeithS
If you could quote the details of the source directly it might both save time and make it easier to confirm. It looks like @Balquo has a lot of the relevant details in his .pdf- not sure if it's the same for Ascension64's ToBEx list though...