Alignment Restrictions
Eldryth
Member Posts: 56
Is there any chance the alignment restrictions on certain classes will be changed? Specifically, the Druid restriction to True Neutral is a little too limiting for me. Later D&D games allowed you to choose an alignment as long as you stayed on one of the neutral axes- Neutral Good or Lawful Neutral. I know those games use a different ruleset, but considering some of the Druid NPCs in BG seem to lean heavily towards evil, I think it would be a good fit. Plus, I'd be a lot more willing to play a Druid if I could be Neutral Good
9
Comments
Edit: Besides, I think it could be fitting to perhaps give Jaheira a NG alignment. I mean despite her sometimes harsh demeanor she seems to have a good heart, being a member of the Harpers and all.
But BGEE will be using 2E rules, so the alignment restrictions won't be changed.
There's a mod for it somewhere though, which probably still works with the Enhanced Edition.
Anywho, it's good that it can be done with a mod, then.
Anywho, I think that Jaheira is more LN or LG rather than NG or TN. She obeys the rules of her order, and prefers to work with official authorities, at least that's my impression of her.
@LordsDarkKnight185 And I think calling it selfish, although perhaps true in a sense, sounds a bit like twisting the meaning of NG... i mean... CG is kind of the same where as you're actively just following your own moral standpoint, whether or not society agrees... would that also be considered selfish?
Why so strict!?
Huh?
You're not my mom, Trent!
(I do know that anti-paladins existed in AD&D but that's not strictly the same, and they're even using the term 'blackguard' which popped up in 3rd.)
Syntia13 - Being secretive doesn't mean that you have something ugly to hide, in the Harpers' case it is because they have powerful evil enemies to be wary of. I don't have any text on the Harpers in front of me, but I do know that they work for freedom, justice, aiding common folk in living reasonably good lives, and other causes which are usually seen as 'good'. I have no idea about your personal experiences, but in my book they are pretty much a good organization, working in the shadows when necessary (which, in their case, happens to be most of the time).