[(BG2, BGEE) bug] Magical rings and armor (0813)
...are not supposed to be worn together, however, currently ankheg plate (plat06) and the Practical Defense (plat08) are slipping by this requirement.
I've also added a couple of items spotted by @Wisp to future-proof this for BG2EE as well.
I've also added a couple of items spotted by @Wisp to future-proof this for BG2EE as well.
APPEND itemexcl.2da "bruenpla 1" UNLESS bruenpla
APPEND itemexcl.2da "leat06 1" UNLESS leat06
APPEND itemexcl.2da "plat06 1" UNLESS plat06
APPEND itemexcl.2da "plat08 1" UNLESS plat08
Post edited by Bhryaen on
1
Comments
The Ankheg plate was removed from that interdiction because its not really a magical armor.
Yeah I know.
I guess you probably disagree with this because its really not a bug and it technically makes an already great armor even more powerful which brings about balance issues.
But personally, I think the Ankheg plate should never have been considered a magical armor in the first place.
If anything, I'm more inclined to agree with reducing the armor class of the Ankheg plate by 1 or 2 to account for its increased utility.
Nah, if I really wanted to start a fight I'd point out how the Cloak of Balduran should be restricted, but then we'd have to delve into the pointless and arbitrary nature of the multiple protection item rules.
Ankheg plate should be restricted but there are, at least, some plausible reasons for its removal.
Potentially fixed - @CamDawg 's fix has been applied with the Ankheg Plate commented out for if we ever determine that the Ankheg is an innately magical creature.
Well, bruenpla doesn't even exist in bg1ee (it will be ok in bg2ee) - this will scare dltcep a bit.
ankheg armor was not added because other betazoids would revolt
The other 2 remaining items are magical, existing and added.
I can't test bruenpla, but leat06 and plat08 both count as magical armor and cannot be equipped at the same time as the ring of protection +1.