Skip to content

Which class which class?

my party i'm planning to have will consist of imoen, minsc, daynaheir, Rasadd, Yeslick and my drow, but i'm wondering wether to make him a fight/theif/mage or just a double multi class? if you could can someone tell me the level cap so I can make a better desiudtion.

Comments

  • mumumomomumumomo Member Posts: 635
    Below are the max level for most multi class given the BG1EE xp cap

    FMC : 6/6/6
    FMT : 6/6/7
    FT : 7/8
    FM : 7/7
    FC 7/7
    RC 7/7
    FD 7/8
    CT 7/8
    CM 7/7
    MT 7/8

    Comparing the double to the triple classes:

    Fighter 7 means 1/2 extra APR.
    mage 7 means access to level 4 spells which are great (stoneskin, spiderspawn, minor globe, improved invis). However the main power of mages in BG1 is the capacity to use wands which are completely OP.
    cleric 7 means access to level 4 divine spells which are not that great (not bad either)
    Thief 8 gives 25 thieving points compared to thief 7. Completely neglectable

    What that means is :
    FMT is much better than FT. 6 levels of mage are much better than 25 skills point and 1/2 extra APR. The only selling point for FT is the possibility to play a short race for saving throw bonus.
    Please note that it does not mean that FT are bad, very far from that, but FMT are much better

    I feel that FMC misses every important breakpoint and i would avoid it.

    --> if you want your charname to take care of scouting, backstabbing, disarming traps, fighting and casting take a FMT, even in a full group.
    However, for the very end game, since they have no access to level 9 spells, they tend to become less powerful than double class mages (FM and MT)

    Anyway, whichever multi you choose, you will end up with an OP character, compared to single class ones.
  • jackjackjackjack Member Posts: 3,251
    Your thieving needs are covered - I suggest rolling a Fighter/Mage.
    If you wish, you can be a Gnome Fighter/Illusionist, well known as one of the most devastating combos in the game.
  • OzzyBotkinsOzzyBotkins Member Posts: 396
    Yeslick does not in till later in the Game.
    Try a Cleric or Cleric/mage
  • jacobtanjacobtan Member Posts: 655
    edited April 2014
    Contrary to most opinions, Yeslick is not really a "late" NPC. In fact, all the NPCs can be gotten relatively early. BG is a game with a short set of core quests and a whole lot of side quests, so even getting to the endgame is easy.

    Since your party only has one NPC thief (Imoen), the question is more about whether Imoen is going to dual, and if she is dual-classing, at what level. If you dual-class Imoen, you need someone who is reasonably capable in thievery to manage things while she's unable to use her thieving abilities, else gameplay can be quite annoying.
  • SCARY_WIZARDSCARY_WIZARD Member Posts: 1,438
    I want to say Fighter/Magic-User/Thief, too. Or Cleric/Thief, if that's your deal. Sanctuary is a fun thing to use while playing with locks and traps!
  • RandyMcStudRandyMcStud Member Posts: 71
    edited April 2014

    my party i'm planning to have will consist of imoen, minsc, daynaheir, Rasadd, Yeslick and my drow, but i'm wondering wether to make him a fight/theif/mage or just a double multi class? if you could can someone tell me the level cap so I can make a better desiudtion.

    Personally, if I were to multiclass, I would take either an elven FMT or a gnome fighter/illusionist.

    The fighter mage thief has the advantages of stealth, backstab, and freeing up another character slot by removing the need to play a thief (though you are taking Imoen anyway, and in BG1, you wont have enough points to be good at lockpicking/trap finding and stealth). But if you intend to carry your character over into BG2, not having to reserve a slot for a thief is very handy.

    The gnome fighter illusionist will get a moderate advantage in terms of base THAC0, health, and saving throws. They will also get the very sizeable gnomish saving throw bonuses, and get to pick a mage specialisation in spite of being multiclassed. In BG1, they will get access the 4th level spells, vs the FMT's 3rd level spells and an extra half attack per round. In BG2, they will gain substantially more high level spell slots, above and beyond their specialisation bonus, plus they will have access to 9th level spells and spell HLAs, vs the FMTs handful of 8th and 7th level spell slots.

    Fighter/clerics and illusionist thieves are both respectable multiclass options. Fighter thieves are fine in themselves, but if you intend to play BG2, then there is very little to reason not to go FMT instead. At high levels and if you are willing to abuse cheese, cleric thieves can be very effective, but otherwise compliment each other somewhat less well than mage thieves. The one multi class I would strongly advise against is cleric mage. These classes mix like oil and water, because you can only use one class at a time. If you are casting cleric spells, you cannot simultaneously cast mage spells and vice versa. All other multiclasses have decent synergy, whereas a cleric mage has almost none.

    However, you might seriously want to consider dual classing, particularly if you intend to export to BG2. The period during which your starting class is inactive is a pain, but if you dual from a fighter at level 9, you will very quickly regain your fighter levels in BG2, and you will have the benefits of being multiclassed to a fighter (in many ways superior, because of grandmastery and being able to pick a kit) whilst giving levelling as a pure class mage, thief or cleric.
Sign In or Register to comment.