Removing Cleric Buffs
chickenhed
Member Posts: 208
So I've spent a lot of time understanding the nuances of arcane magic (especially for SCS) and the chess match involved in protecting and removing mage buffs. Then I thought of priests. In SCS (or even vanilla) are they completely screwed?
If I buff a cleric up with many of his protections, would a mage (especially a SCS one) just throw a dispel magic my way and remove all cleric buffs? If so, is there any way to protect them?
Lastly, is dispel/remove magic the only way to remove priest buffs?
Thanks in advance!
If I buff a cleric up with many of his protections, would a mage (especially a SCS one) just throw a dispel magic my way and remove all cleric buffs? If so, is there any way to protect them?
Lastly, is dispel/remove magic the only way to remove priest buffs?
Thanks in advance!
0
Comments
*If you succeed with it, of course
But like Tresset mentioned it gets rid of most but not all spell protections. For instance Shield of the Archons doesn't actually protect against it (despite the description stating otherwise) but in my playtests for a bug report I noticed that while dispel magic would remove all the other protections I had active (even when Shield of Archons was activated) it wouldn't actually remove Shield of the Archons itself.
So in a fight, the mage is definitely going to have the upper hand. But after the fight when your party needs healing/resurrection, the mage isn't much use.
That said, priests get dispel magic too and the only defence against it is the mage spell immunity:abjuration (which admittely gets used by most mages in SCS).
Either way, I see what you guys are getting at and I understand. I have NO issues with the raw powerhouse that is the Mage. He takes a while to get going, and even when he is higher level, he has "limited" spell casting per day. If we couldn't meta game or rest at any point, the power of the mage would be much more controlled. But because we encounter each mage (whether it's our own mage or an enemy) "at their best", as it were, then mage will always dominate.
In 3.x there are ways around magic defence, IE Justicar with anti-magic gauntlets shuts down a caster unless they disjunct generally. Shadowweave weirdness aside of course. 2nd ed really made mages powerhouses able to do anything without fear vs anything but another mage. Not that 3.x didnt have silly mage tricks too.