Druid slinger through the whole series/first time playing
zerimo
Member Posts: 29
I want to play through as a ranged character that can cast some spells and maybe buffs and the like.
I'm thinking of multiclassing fighter/druid and using slings in the back.
Is this a doable way of playing through both games with expansions for a first-timer, playing on core?
I would like to play as a fighter/cleric using ranged, but with 2 points in 2 weapon style is this a mistake?
Any advice is appreciated, thanks.
I'm thinking of multiclassing fighter/druid and using slings in the back.
Is this a doable way of playing through both games with expansions for a first-timer, playing on core?
I would like to play as a fighter/cleric using ranged, but with 2 points in 2 weapon style is this a mistake?
Any advice is appreciated, thanks.
0
Comments
If it's your first time play, do as you want! Relish the chance! How much would I give away to get that feeling of first-time playing BG...
So, don't hesitate and do as you wish! Try everything you want to do. It will be worth it! I
f while playing you feel you want to change something, you can always roll a new character : ) We all do it every time.
I see your point that i should just roll with it but i still wonder if it's a mistake to go with ranger/cleric slinger.
Thanks.
The loss of the two weapon style bonus won't cripple you, don't worry.
If it has then it's a much closer choice between alternatives like Fighter/Druid (who can use throwing daggers and darts too) and Fighter/Cleric (as you don't have to be half-elf).
Generally when people get the feels for what you want to do they turn to a bow user like a bard or multi/dual Mage.
You're right, i never thought about being a bard, aren't they sort of like a fighter/mage/thief multiclass or do they get cleric and druid spells aswell?
A fighter/mage bowman does sound interesting, would you say that good NPC mages are lacking in both BG? Because then i might go with that, if you compare druid/cleric-spells vs. mage-spells? More important/fun?
F/M, F/M/C or R/C all seem like solid classes so i'll probably choose one ot them.
Mages are pretty well represented by the NPCs in both games, particularly if you're going to have an evil party.
There really isn't a class you can't finish the game with on core (or any other difficulty for that matter). That said, some are more powerful than others, obviously. The ranger/cleric is a solid choice, with no serious drawbacks that should steal any fun away from your first play through. There are certainly quite a few less powerful choices than R/C, so don't worry that you're picking the "worst" class combo.
For a first time I'd suggest avoiding the F/M/C unless you plan to run with a party of four or less. Leveling up will take a long time with a triple class. They can be great for a solo or small party run though.
Bards get Mage spells but at a slower rate than mages and miss out on the high level spells. However, they go up in level very fast so their effective caster level for the spells that they do have is a great perk. Bards can use any weapon (except the composite longbow for some stupid reason). Bards have pick pocket. Don't play a bard if you want to feel powerful. Bards in IWD are much stronger. The bard kits are quite good and you end up with very different bards depending on your kit.
Mage spells are more important and it's hard to have too many mages. A FM, FMT and a FMC are all great characters and very strong. I've actually played all three and had a ball with all of them.
Half-elf has the most multiclass options available but has the smallest racial perks. In contrast, other races have stat boosts and other perks like saving throw boosts (for short races).
Bards get Mage spells but at a slower rate than mages and miss out on the high level spells. However, they go up in level very fast so their effective caster level for the spells that they do have is a great perk. Bards can use any weapon (except the composite longbow for some stupid reason). Bards have pick pocket. Don't play a bard if you want to feel powerful. Bards in IWD are much stronger. The bard kits are quite good and you end up with very different bards depending on your kit.
Mage spells are more important and it's hard to have too many mages. A FM, FMT and a FMC are all great characters and very strong. I've actually played all three and had a ball with all of them.
Okay so i've decided on a R/C slinger, just one more question, what are the must-have spells considering i will focus on causing damage with slings and except the most powerful spells will focus on buffs and perks.
I have already chosen Command, Minor heal and Sanctuary.
Thanks
2nd lvl spells are goodies like hold person:immobilize multiple enemies, silence is very hard to resist and will shut down enemy clerics and mages nicely. Draw upon holy might will take your stats to godly levels if you start with 18 str, dex and con, after lvl 6 it boosts all by +2 and 20 str is very different than 18/x strength, your sling damage will go up considerably.
3rd lvl is the staple and cheapest summoning animate dead, and call lightning can be devastating to enemies as well. Remove paralysis can save lives against ghouls and ghasts.
Will i be able to choose lower level spells when i level up or is it too late for Remove fear?
Mages (and starting from lvl 2, bards as well) work like that, too, except they don't gain new spells each lvl, they need to find spell scrolls and write the scroll into their books, this is THE only way they can learn new spells. Once learned, they can fill up their memorisation spell slots from the spells they know, just like clerics do.
Sorcerers are totally different, they don't learn from scrolls, they don't fill up memorisation slots, they choose to learn a new spell at each lvl up, and can cast a number of spells from each spell level. Say. A lvl 1 sorcerer knows two spells, and can cast three of them, he can cast any combination of the two spells three times, they don't need to prepare or memorise spell beforehand. This makes them versatile in spontaneous casting but very limited in actual spell knowledge. A mage needs to prepare identify spells to use them, but when he finds himself up against an enemy he may wish he had prepared a damage spell like burning hands (the other spel in his book) instead! A sorcerer who knows both spells can choose to cast either identify or burning hands on the spot. However a mage can learn every spell in the game and can re-arrange his memorised spells at every rest to suit the needs of the quest/area at hand. A sorcerer is forever limited to the spells he has learned at lvl up, and they are few (up to five spells per spell level at higher levels) but he can cast them more repeatedly. They are forever the practitioners, not the know-it-all expert.
So as a cleric you need to prepare the correct spells for each day. If you know you are up against a mage soon, prepare and buff with remove fear, so the mage can't horror your party. If your party is in bad shape, fill up your slots with all cure wounds spell to act as the walking first aid kit. If you are in an area infested by giant spiders, prepare slow poison spells (lvl 2 spell) to save the lives of your companions. And if you are skirmishing in an open area (not an underground cave or dungeon!) memorise call lightning (lvl 3 spell) to blast your enemies to dust. (Call lightning does not work in indoors or dungeons)
Is the memorization limited to 3 or does it rise as you level up?
Is there a level cap in BG1, if there is what happens to the rest of the XP?
Also, will i only be able to memorize spells from the same spell-levels, or can i pick and choose among all my spells?
Building around the xp cap, a dual classed warrior/druid could even be lvl 7/9 (and have access to a single grand mastery) but dualing at lvl 7 is a pain for like a half of the game. This, and stats required in order to dual to druid are quite ludicrous (17 wisdom, 17 charisma).
You get a certain amounts of spell slots in which you can memorize spells for each spell level, depending on your level. Each spell slot can only be used to memorize spells of his level, meaning you can't even put a first-level heal into a second-level spell slot. High wisdom also gives you bonus slots at certain spell levels.
Something that i don't understand is that if you look at Howlongtobeat.com baldurs gate with sidequests alone is around 57 hours and TOTSC is 19 hours, while BGEE which includes the expansion is only 47 hours long, it should land at almost 80 hours..
Have they shortened it or what happened?
Fighters, Paladins, Rangers, & Clerics: Level 8
Mages & Sorcerers: Level 9
Thieves, Bards, & Druids: Level 10
Multiclassed characters obviously don't level up as much as they have to split XP evenly between their classes.
Dual classing throws a wrench into things. At that point, it depends on when you change and what classes are involved.
So a few more questions:
Do i need to have good partymembers since i am good and does it affect anything if i have an evil partymember?
Should i aim at having as few partymembers as possible to gain more XP?
As a ranger/cleric i guess i will at least need a tank, a mage, and a thief to have a allround party right?
I was thinking imoen as thief/ranged but after that i don't know.
Since i'm a ranger is Jaheira even worth keeping?
For tanks i've already got Khalid, Minsc and Kagain and i think that i only want to keep one them, i'll decide later.
The thing i'm wondering about the most is mages?
Any advice is appreciated and yes i know that is isn't crucial to sit for 20 minutes figuring out partymembers, i just want an allround party.
Thanks.
-If you do too many good deeds and your party reputation hits 19 or 20, evil npcs in your party will get angry and leave forever. Some evil npcs will conflict with other npcs in your party, and they may decide to fight to death, even. If you do evil deeds to please them, and your rep drops too low, good npcs will get angry and leave, you will be a fallen ranger and lose your class abilities forever, and you will become a wanted criminal and the law of the land will chase your head. And every shopkeeper will charge you a lot of gold for even the simplest purchase. Some quests will not be open to you.
-It is your call, but for a first time player, having six people is better IMHO, that's six actions per round, a great tactical advantage! A party of three will be a lvl higher but can only cast three spells, attack 3 targets, etc. in a given round. Expert players often solo the game and it is a fun and fundementally different way of playing.
-You can be the tank and the healer, as needed, so a mage and thief is really needed. Ranged attackers are very good in bg1, so having one or two determined archer is excellent, too. Kivan and Coran are excellent picks for this role. Coran can also sub for thievery and Kivan can scout, and dish some melee damage thanks to his big strength, as well.
-Imoen is excellent as a thief and support archer. She is nowhere as good as the serious archers like Kivan or Coran, though. She can also dual class into mage, if you wish, but that is a complicated mechanic that requires some tedious planning, so you may leave it to another play through.
-Jaheira is rather limited in usefulness in bg1, thanks to her horrible dex score. She can't tank well, and is not good at ranged fight either. She is best at support healer and as a defense line in between your tanks, and archer-mage characters. Khalid is versatile and useful, you can master longswords with him, give him full plate and a magical shield and he will do well as a tank. There are more powerful options in the game, however this duo is the most trustworthy and easiest to please.
-One mage is enough for the party, if you have Minsc and want to keep him you will save Dynaheir, eventually. She is a capable mage but she can't cast useful, battle stopper spells like sleep and charm person. There is also Xan, who is the exact opposite, can master all enchantment spells but can't cast fireballs. It is easily redeemable though since there are a lot of fireball wands in the game and Xan can use them just as well. Other mages are evil and may not be suitable for your party at all. And then there is Neera. She is rather...well, I will let you find out about her yourself, it must be a surprise. Or a series of surprises, rather.. ^^
This could be a huge "confession of a Bhaalspawn"!!!
I had never noticed it!!
Does it work both importing from a savegame and from a character file?
If you start by raising only her "find traps", you can have it at 100 (sufficient for every single traps in the game) at lvl 4 , which is 5000 xp for a thief. If you dual her right after that, you will get your trap-finder back at 25000 xp (lvl 4 rogue + lvl 5 mage) and afterwards, you'll have a mage who is only slightly lower in xp (max lvl remains the same), and can also disarm any traps in the game, and use short-bows/crossbows.
The others thieving duties can be assured by Coran, who is basically an amazing archer and an ok thief, with just a little weakness in traps finding (that's why you focus on that with imoen).
Now that's not something I would recommend for a "first timer, playing on core". Having some knowledge about where you'll need find traps and where you can earn some easy xp really helps. But it's possible, and imo one of the most powerful way to get both a thief and a mage in a good party.
If you want to do something simpler, Dynaheir is your best bet indeed, though her kit means she shan't ever cast enchantments. If you decide against rescuing her, you will also have to bid farewell to Minsc, as he will not tolerate that his sorceress and friend is left at the gnolls' mercy. You can also not take any mage at all and rely solely on support given by secondary casters, such as bards. You won't access the migthiest spells, like cloudkill, and you will generally have less spells, but you will cast most of these at a slightly more powerful level due to some second-edition-DnD bullshit. And bards can use ranged weapons that aren't slings, wear armours when they don't have any spells anymore, have ridiculously high Lore values, meaning they can identify lots of items just by looking at them and can also pickpocket like pros. Oh, also, they sing, but I wouldn't recommend it. Garrick is an okay bard (well, his stats are terrible, and you will find that learning spells is a pain in the ass, but apart from that he's cool. At least he has some dex) and can be found really early.
Also your tanks are cool, and if you want a bit more holy firepower you'll probably meet a fighter/cleric at some point that can tank just as well as a fighter.
Is it really necessary to even have a thief in your party? Pickpocketing, stealing, hiding and then backstab etc has never really been my style of play except maybe in games like Skyrim.
Could i just put some points in Find traps with Imoen and then dual class her?
If so and even though i haven't decided quite yet but from what answers i was given i think my party will look something like:
Hero: Heal, caster, ranged
Imoen: Mage, ranged
Coran or Kivan: Ranged
Minsc, Kagain or/and Khalid: Tanks
As i understand it, i can have a full party and still get to highest levels in the endgame of each game?
Thanks!