Why do adventurers need to have a stake in the vampire?
OlvynChuru
Member Posts: 3,079
I've been wondering for quite a while now why we need a stake in order to kill a vampire. It doesn't make any sense as far as I can tell, because what is special about a stake that allows it and it alone to finish off a vampire?
If it's because the stake is blessed, then the Daystar or another undead-slaying weapon should also be able to finish off a vampire.
If it's because the stake is made of wood, then an ordinary club should be able to do the trick.
I'm not sure what the deal is. Do any of you have a better idea?
If it's because the stake is blessed, then the Daystar or another undead-slaying weapon should also be able to finish off a vampire.
If it's because the stake is made of wood, then an ordinary club should be able to do the trick.
I'm not sure what the deal is. Do any of you have a better idea?
1
Comments
There are other ways to kill them...just ask Buffy. And see the following:
http://www.gods-and-monsters.com/how-to-kill-a-vampire.html
3 in the top floor of Bodhi's lair the first time around
3 the second time around
Bodhi the second time around
The vampire in Spellhold
Compare that to how many vampires you 'defeat' throughout the saga. The only thing Charname is worse at killing is liches (not a single phylactery destroyed).
Which is why I can never have Charname be an Undead Hunter Paladin. It would just be too sad...
@Grum - I think the in-game theory is that generic Vampires (and Fledgling Vampires, obviously) are "not fully developed" and don't yet need the staking ritual to destroy them; it's only the more senior vampires (i.e. the ones who have names) who require the traditional ritual.