Whimp taunts please!
HexHammer
Member Posts: 288
While I find many of the taunts very good, there's not the whimpy taunts category, all are very heroic and such.
- AAARRRR!!!
- not in the face!!! ..(sob!! ..whimper!!)
- run for the hills!
- no, ..i ..i don't want to..
- ..no, it ..it will fight back..
- can't someone else do it?
- AAARRRR!!!
- not in the face!!! ..(sob!! ..whimper!!)
- run for the hills!
- no, ..i ..i don't want to..
- ..no, it ..it will fight back..
- can't someone else do it?
Post edited by HexHammer on
1
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
- Why me! Why me!
- Look , can't we talk about this!
- I've got your back... Honest.
- I'll be right behind you...
- We meant no offence... Err... We'll just be going...
- Don't just stand there RUUUUNNN!
- Your running the wrong way! Run away, AWAAAAY!
- NOOOEESSS!!! MY HAIR!! MY HAIR!! (enrages) ..THAT SORRY BASTARD MUST DIE!!!!!!!
- awww, I broke a nail..
- uuh! Look at those yummy shoes!!
- does this armor make my butt look big?
- OH ..MY ..GAWD!!!
- eww, that's an armor I don't wanna get caught dead in..
It's a game! It should be fun and relaxed! No need to take everything soooo serious!
EDIT: To put it in another perspective, what if it was racist taunts? It's a game, and it's not so serious, we should be fun and relaxed about the racism!
For the record, I think your and Anduin's first posts are hilarious, just want to stomp the sexism before it's brushed off as okay.
...Unless it's not black. I don't think I've ever seen an actual black kettle. Google's being less than helpful, too.
My point is, whether it's in a game or a book or said on the playground at school, it's still going to be judged for what it is. Gender stereotyping is a plague on the gaming industry that's only just recently even begun to find its way remission, and it's something feminist gamers (not all of whom are female, I'll note with some pride) are always going to be aware of.
Now, if there were a female NPC who said those things, who was then ridiculed by another female NPC for being so stereotypical, then that would be different, because it would be a subversion of the stereotype. But sexism on its own without any commentary on the fact that it's sexist? Problematic, at the very least.
<--has a wife in grad school; knows stuff (also went to college and so knows stuff from own experience, but yeah)
And... it's not a comedy game, it's a Roleplaying Game. It's not even a comedy RPG. The kind of stuff you posted should only go with whipped cream pies in the face and pratfalls on banana peels. Because that's the level of "comedy" we are talking here.
is probably my favorite.
There is also this older kind of kettle:
If everything should be so politcally correct, then we shouldn't be able to kill anyone unless we'r send to do it with govermental approval, or in unavoidable selfdefense.
We'r blessed with the right to choose, you are not forced to choose these potential sexist taunts, if they should appear, that's the essence of freedom!
In contrast, your female stereotypes are only meant to be enjoyed. We're supposed to have fun not with a cowardly character who happens to be a woman, but a character specifically designed to embody some of the worst, most annoying traits associated with modern day females. Even if you didn't mean anything by it, someone who hears these lines in the game won't have any context besides the video game industry's well-known treatment of women. And these lines are indistinguishable from the sexist caricatures many people actually believe in.
They're also immersion-breaking.
The very act of killing is far far worse than being a bit sexistic, this is out of proportion and hysterically.
You can choose not to invade the Sirens' territory, you can choose not to attack the xvart camp. You can choose to only go through the main story. But you can't choose to have Skie behave like the conventional "princess"; that's how she's written.
That's the difference.
We play a game that encourage us to kill left and right without ANY justice in general, only for the mere plesure of role play we get to have to moch up justice when convenient.
When you kill in a video game, you are aware that it's a means to an end. You kill things so that you can get loot and experience. You kill enemies because they're trying to kill you. You kill the villain because the villain is evil.
Explain, then, how sexist voice sets or commentary, and gender role stereotyping, is a means to any end except to marginalize women (or men, for that matter).
A sexist character like Anomen can be talked back to. You can point out the foibles in his dealing with women, you can even antagonize him for it. You can also choose to accept them, if you want to.
If there is no mechanism in place for questioning that kind of chauvinism, then it stops being a commentary on gender stereotypes and starts being a vehicle to promote them. Whether that's the intention or not, that's the result. And really, it usually isn't the intention. It's usually the result of not realizing how damaging it is to have the main female protagonist be protected by her male sidekick, or to rely on her sexy clothing and seductive voice to curry favor with a male-controlled society.
It's the acknowledgement of the problem that leads to changes from this:
Into this:
(same character, two years apart)
Which is really strong forward progress.