Skip to content

Lord of the Rings Party - What Are Their Stats?

LemernisLemernis Member, Moderator Posts: 4,318
edited October 2012 in Off-Topic
Gandalf is clearly a Mage.
Aragorn is clearly a Ranger.
Legolas is a Ranger with Archer kit.
Gimli is a Fighter.
Frodo is... well, he doesn't really have any adventuring skills, actually... but I guess we'll say he's a Thief. (The other hobbits don't really have adventuring skills either, so we'll leave them out.)
Arwen is, I would say, a Cleric... or Druid.

What would their stats be?
«1

Comments

  • KhamillKhamill Member Posts: 226
    I see it that way

    Aragorn - Palladin
    Boromir - Fighter
    Gimli - Fighter
    Legolas - Ranger
    Gandalf - Mage
    Frodo/Sam/Merry/Pippin - Bard

  • PaladinPaladin Member Posts: 335
    I know Aragorn says he is a 'ranger' in the books but he really is more like a fighter.
  • LemernisLemernis Member, Moderator Posts: 4,318
    edited October 2012
    Interesting about the hobbits being Bards... I would say that is for sure true of Bilbo, who loved to go off on an adventure and write of it.

    In LotR Aragorn was sort of the prototype for the Ranger class, as Tolkien described the character. Although I can see paladin fitting him as well.

    What about Str, Dex, Con, Int, Wis, and Cha for them, though?
  • ArveragusArveragus Member Posts: 62
    I would still classify Frodo as a thief - much in the same way as Bilbo was in The Hobbit. After all, the nature of Bilbo's employment in the advenure by the dwarves as organised by Gandalf was that of 'burglar'.
  • LemernisLemernis Member, Moderator Posts: 4,318
    Brude said:

    Jeez, with four Bards in the party it's a wonder they survived the first movie. ;)

    @Lemernis, after this I fully expect to see "The Lost in Space Party, What are Their Stats?" as your next thread!

    This topic is a nerdy chestnut!
  • BrudeBrude Member Posts: 560
    Also, for stats I'm thinking super-hairy feet should be an automatic -4 CHA modifier.
  • LemernisLemernis Member, Moderator Posts: 4,318
    edited October 2012
    Brude said:

    Also, for stats I'm thinking super-hairy feet should be an automatic -4 CHA modifier.

    Lol. Well, not to other hobbits.

    Does seem kind of feral, though.
  • BrudeBrude Member Posts: 560
    A little more on topic --

    I think the challenge with something like this is giving each character accurate stats but not "god stats," ie attributes that are so good any one of them could stand in for a PC. Ie, we don't simply max everything out and call it a day.

    So Legolas has a high DEX (17-18) and maybe Gimli has Mastery or High Mastery with axes.
  • eksterekster Member Posts: 234
    edited October 2012
    Going by the movie, Gandalf, when he's not faking his back pain, is probably 18/00Str 18Dex 10Con 12Int 18Wis 18Cha
    And he's a fighter/mage. I mean, wielding a two handed staff in one hand, a sword in the other, and riding a horse in the front lines? That's no old man!
    From the books, I'd say he would be closer to 10Str 9Dex 8Con 14Int 16Wis 18-20Cha

    Legolas is a ranger - archer 12Str 18-19Dex 10Con 12Int 12Wis 12Cha
    Aragorn is a Paladin/Ranger 15Str 15Dex 14Con 12Int 14Wis 16-18Cha
    Gimli is a fighter 18Str 10Dex 18Con 10Int 8Wis 10Cha
    Baromir is a figher 16Str 12Dex 12Con 12Int 10Wis 12Cha

    Frodo would be a peasant with 12Str 14Dex 16Con 16Int 10Wis 12Cha (you need some high con to survive those wounds he got, and he was smart enough to get pretty far... just not wise enough to avoid the trouble.)
    Sam is a bard with 14Str 10Dex 12Con 10Int 12Wis 16Cha (Sam was very good at improving morale!)
  • mlnevesemlnevese Member, Moderator Posts: 10,214
    edited October 2012
    Considering Gandalf is actually a demigod-level entity, I easily see him having stats above 20... Mainly after he's raised from the dead and returns as Gandalf, The White...
    Post edited by mlnevese on
  • hansolohansolo Member Posts: 136
    edited October 2012
    @Sily
    I agree with you, you can't really transfer the Tolkien system to DnD.
    Though trying is still fun :)

    Being a Maia, Gandalf would have pretty godly stats. He fought 1 on 1 with a Balrog (with a bit help from his magic ring).
    Gandalf - Maia - Fighter/Mage - 18/00 STR - 18 DEX - 17 CON - 20 INT - 21 WIS - 17 CHA

    Bards can pick pockets as well, so Bard is actually pretty fitting to the Hobbits. Plus they like songs ;)
    It should be a modified Hobbit version Bard ideally, who cannot cast spells.
    Frodo - Hobbit - Bard - 10 STR - 11 DEX - 11 CON - 13 INT - 11 WIS - 15 CHA
    Sam, I go with ekster's version with a bit lower strength:
    Sam - Hobbit - Bard - 11 STR - 10 DEX - 12 CON - 10 INT - 12 WIS - 16 CHA
    Pippin, Merry ?

    Aragorn - Dunadain - Ranger - 18/10 STR - 16 DEX - 17 CON - 13 INT - 13 WIS - 17 CHA
    Boromir - Human - Fighter - 17 STR - 16 DEX - 15 CON - 13 INT - 9 WIS - 11 CHA

    Elves are OP in the Tolkien world.
    Legolas - Woodelf - Archer - 18/71 STR - 19 DEX - 18 CON - 15 INT - 18 WIS - 15 CHA

    Gimli - Dwarf - Fighter - 18/35 STR - 12 DEX - 17 CON - 9 INT - 11 WIS - 9 CHA


    What would be the alignments of them?
    Lots of Lawful and Neutral Good, I guess
    Post edited by hansolo on
  • mlnevesemlnevese Member, Moderator Posts: 10,214
    I would place Gandalf's strength in the 20s as well. Wielding a quarterstaff one handed and a sword is quite a feat of strength.
  • hansolohansolo Member Posts: 136
    edited October 2012
    Hmm, otherwise it didn't seem like he would have easily dispatched of the cave troll in Moria alone by brute force. Which he should have if his strength would be over the 20s.
    I'd say, the cave troll should be, maybe, 19 or 20 STR by DnD standards?
  • mlnevesemlnevese Member, Moderator Posts: 10,214
    edited October 2012
    He could, but he wouldn't. The only reason he uses his full power on the Balrog is because of what the Balrog is. If it ever left Moria, it could easily bring destruction to the world. A destruction no mortal would have hope to stop. Or worst it could try to bring back the other Balrogs still imprisoned deep in the Earth and make it impossible even for the Maia to save the world.

    The Troll was dangerous but was just a beast. So the normal limits a Maia imposes himself apply. He can help, guide, even fight, but he can't solve all the problems for the mortals.

    On another note, I'd raise his constitution above 20 as well. The fight against the Balrog went on for THREE full days, no rests, no stops... just stop to consider what it means :)
  • LordsDarkKnight185LordsDarkKnight185 Member Posts: 615
    Gandalf is a level 3 magic-user >.>
  • LordsDarkKnight185LordsDarkKnight185 Member Posts: 615
    hansolo said:

    Hmm, otherwise it didn't seem like he would have easily dispatched of the cave troll in Moria alone by brute force. Which he should have if his strength would be over the 20s.
    I'd say, the cave troll should be, maybe, 19 or 20 STR by DnD standards?

    By D&D standards, a cave troll would be a hill giant, and we all know hill giants have 19 str
  • HaHaCharadeHaHaCharade Member Posts: 1,644
    How about their alignments?

    Anyone that says Boromir is evil is taking crazy pills. He's obviously not. In fact Tolkien pretty much says so in the way that Aragorn first describes him.
  • eksterekster Member Posts: 234
    Baromir would definitely be Lawful Good. He's not evil, he's just more concerend about fighting for Gondor and their people than anything else.

    For Aragorn, I'm not sure where to put him on the lawful/chaotic scale, but I think he is mostly neutral good. While he is able to follow and do what has to be done, he also did disappear to do his own thing as a ranger because he wouldn't accept his bloodline.

    Gandalf is True Neutral. While he helped the good side to win, I would not say that it was his purpose. He was there more to undo Sauron's work and get rid of Sauron, who shouldn't have been there in the first place. But other than that, Gandalf mostly let the mortals decide their own fate.

    Legolas seems more of LG to me. In fact, I think he was the most lawful of them all. I cannot recall a single time when Legolas had problems taking orders or disregarded them.

    Gimli is CG. He complained about almost everything, always wanted to do it his way, and wasn't much for order.

    Sam was also LG. He had no reason to be there at all... but he was given one order by Gandalf and he almost died following it. Pretty impressive for a gardener. He might've sometimes acted a bit chaotic when it came to food or Smeagol, but in the end, he followed his orders anyway.

    Frodo... I think he was somewhere between True Neutral and Neutral Good. While he was really Neutral Good, the ring's influence sometimes pushed him to TN.
  • MoomintrollMoomintroll Member Posts: 1,498
    Brude said:

    Also, for stats I'm thinking super-hairy feet should be an automatic -4 CHA modifier.

    I'm thinking the exact opposite!
  • MoomintrollMoomintroll Member Posts: 1,498
    I'd not be giving Gandalf these epic intelligence scores. He can't figure out the riddle on the doors to Moria, he needs Elrond's help to read the runes on Glamdring and Orcrist. He is known for being wise, not cunning imo.
  • ryuken87ryuken87 Member Posts: 563
    Sily said:

    To talk about LOTR this way requires a bit deeper knowledge of the lore (for the discussion to be in any way accurate) than just converting them all to D&D.

    Then, in Tolkien's works, it dosn't come down to Physical strenght and martial prowess in most fights. There seems to be something much larger going on in the background (willpower, fate, spirit, call it what you will). There were -single- elves who could fell Balrogs. Elves were absolutely brutal, they slaughtered each other and had all sorts of fun with axes and what not. Elves are also stronger than any man or dwarf, now don't quote me on this, but do research yourself and bring something to quote against me on this.


    Legolas: To put stats on him would put him above any character in The Fellowship, except Gandalf. Also - Legolas does not dual wield. He carried a "long white knife". His age however is never specified, so we can't tell how "great" of an elf he is (since some of their powers seem to be tied to: A) Their heritage. B) Their Age.) Legolas is not mentioned in the Hobbit, but allow me to quote Wikipedia again: For instance, he calls them "children" and says he has seen "many an oak grow from acorn to ruinous age".
    Gandalf calls Legolas a "dangerous warrior".


    There's Gandalf, who as mlneyse above me said, is a demigod. Now, bringing classes into this discussion just dosn't work again. Magic operates in a whole different way in LOTR, you can't just say that Gandalf is a "Mage" in D&D terms, that.. dosn't work. But lets not go more in depth with this character. Gandalf is a Wizard, and he's.. 2000 years old?


    Now we get to the good stuff, Aragorn, a Dunedain.
    Again, the "superior races" in Tolkien's world come as OP. The folk of Numenor -were- almost as powerful as elves. And the same blood, even though heavily lessened flows in Aragorn's veins.
    "The Dúnedain were superior to other Men in nobility of spirit and body, although they were still capable of evil if corrupted, and tended to do more evil in such circumstances. They were tall, with dark hair, pale skin and grey eyes.

    In addition, Dúnedain, especially those of high rank, possessed great wisdom and discernment, and occasional prophecy. They benefited from longer life-spans (three times the life of a regular man) than ordinary men and could retain their youth until the very end of their days. Though the reason is not fully explained in the 'Tale of the Years', one factor that almost certainly contributed to their numerical decline was an extremely low birth rate, with many couples having only one child."

    End note: My apologies, did I just take this whole thread Off-Topic with my scramblings?

    You're right, classifying them in DnD terms doesn't really work, especially if going by 2nd edition class restrictions and 18 being more or less the max in each stat. There's no reason not to give Gandalf (who may have spent 2000 years as a wizard but is tens of thousands of years old as Olorin) a ridiculously high wisdom for example since there is nobody wiser on Middle Earth.

    Legolas was actually from among the weakest of the elvish groups, as when the Elves awoke prior to the first age of MIddle Earth some (the Moriquendi or Dark Elves) never reached Valinor and therefore never saw the light of the Two Trees before they were destroyed (long story). Legolas is descended from these elves. Elves which saw the light (Calaquendi) were superior in many ways, many being 7 foot or taller.

    The first Numnoreans were led by Elrond's brother Elros, and thus have the blood of Calaquendi elves, so the Dunedain descendents were superior to other men. I believe there is Numenorean blood in Boromir too, albeit much thinner.

    Anyways:
    Gandalf - mostly mage but some elements of fighter and druid.
    Aragorn - Ranger then paladin.
    Legolas - Archer.
    Gimli - fighter.
    Boromir - fighter.
    Hobbits - mixtures of thief and fighter.
  • MoomintrollMoomintroll Member Posts: 1,498
    Sam has some undeniable bardic qualities, having studied under Bilbo, knowing verse on ancient lore (Gilgalad at any rate) and using song to bolster his spirits whilst rescuing Frodo from the orcs.
  • PhælinPhælin Member Posts: 316
    hansolo said:


    Legolas - Woodelf - Archer - 18/71 STR - 19 DEX - 18 CON - 15 INT - 18 WIS - 15 CHA
    Gimli - Dwarf - Fighter - 18/35 STR - 12 DEX - 17 CON - 9 INT - 11 WIS - 9 CHA

    You think that Legolas has a better STR and CON than Gimli?

  • ShinShin Member Posts: 2,344
    @Sily provides a good analysis of how the racial/bloodline aspect of LotR overshadows a lot of other things. Like @ryuken87 says though, Legolas is a so-called Sindar elf, and thus would be a bit more down to earth statswise. The essentially OP elves would be the Noldor, being statwise essentially bigger, stronger, faster and more agile than humans as well as having heightened senses and being immortal. Elrond and Galadriel belong to this race, and Aragorn is descended from them.
  • ManveruManveru Member Posts: 75
    I think Gandalf is more a cleric/mage combination, as he's draws his powers from a divine source. I think he's known as a wizard because magic is not something that usual in middle earth like it's in D&D.

    The think about tolkien elves is that they live in two worlds, the physical and the spirit world. When Frodo was overcome by the ring, he moved to the spirit world and saw a bright light, which was Glorfindel. He's one of the elves that saw the light in Valinor and came back to middle earth. He is part of the Calaquendi ( Elves of the light). Legolas is one of the Moriquendi (Elves of the darkness), or those that have not seen the light, so technically you could even go as far as name him a dark elf, even though it has a totally different meaning in middle earth.
  • hoss88hoss88 Member Posts: 1
    Ok this is old I see and idk if anyone will see this but you guys are for the most part giving these guys way too mundane of stats. They are heroes of epic proportions and do epic things. Gandalf I don't remover needing help to figure out the dwarven door in Moria in the books but I could be wrong. Either way he's 2000+ years old and would have around a 20 INT. Gimili would have have and 18/00 STR and an 18 CON while Legolas' DEX is easily a 20. All that shield sliding and perfect bow shots he pulls. Aragorn has at least an 18 STR and definitely an 18 CON considering falling over a cliff and surviving. And Boromir come on with these piddley ass CON scores! He took like 6 Arrows in the chest and still took down a host of orcs and survived and good while after =19 CON imo. We really don't know what Gandalf is truly capable of considering he doesn't do much but he did take down the Balrog single handedly. I wouldn't class Aragorn as a Palladian either. He doesn't do magic in any form that I recall. So Ranger is best. Legolas is a Ranger/Druid/Cleric considering all Elves have nature and healing magic to some extent in Tolkien's realm. Gimili probably a fighter straight up with some feats that allow strength and stamina boosts considering he ran for days to keep up with Legolas and Aragorn. Boromir also a fighter with special feats that enhance weapon prowess and constitution. Just my opinion on the matter.
  • LindeblomLindeblom Member Posts: 257
    I would think that everyone except the hobbitses has godly numbers in atleaset 2-3 stats. I am a firm believer that people often would put to high numbers on living and historical people whenever that question pops up, but we are talking about the fellowship here!
    I could see the hobbitses as thieves with all thieving numbers put into move silently and hide in shadows.
    The hobbitses in my eyes all have decent-high charisma. Frodo gets the attention and approval from all the races at Elronds council....to me that was a result of his charisma and not because of his solution to the ring problem. The other ones was mainly treated good, at least in comparison to others, even by the crazy old man Denethor!
  • jethrojethro Member Posts: 81
    Boromir seems like a Paladin honestly...one that has fallen...

    Gandalf also seems like he'd be aligned more as a Chaotic Good character. And I don't see why he shouldn't have god-like stats...hell my Charname has them by the end of BG1 with all those damned tomes!

    Also, don't you think Aragorn would have better Wisdom and Intelligence than Legolas? I mean he makes some tough TOUGH decisions that turn out well, works the whole "I'm back as a King, but not yet cause politically it might cause an issue" thing which seems pretty wise to me...

    Aragorn - 18/95 str 17 dex 19 con 15 int 17 wis 18 cha seems about right.
    Gimli - 19 str 14 dex 19 con 9 int 11 wis 8 cha
    Legolas - 17 str 20 dex 19 con 14 int 15 wis 10 cha
    Gandalf - Druid/Mage levels 50+ - 17 str 16 dex 20 con 25 int 25 wis 20 cha...with Mastery in swords and staff dual wielding!

    Merry and Pippin start as level 1 thieves and spend their points in pick pocketing and opening locks and setting traps. They also dual to fighters at level 5...Both are CG - 14 str (becomes 16!) 12 dex 16 con 7 int 7 wis 14 cha (becomes 16!)

    Frodo is a NG thief. Spends points in hide in shadows, moves silently, detect illusion. 11 str 15 dex 20 con 13 int 13 wis 18 cha
    Sam is a NG bard. With no magic. But extra bonuses to Bard Song! 14 str 14 dex 18 con 9 int 14 wis 15 cha

    The Ring is cursed, granting invisibility and Far Sight casts as well as enough damage to off set Frodo's 20 con and still hurt him at like 1 HP a day. It also changes the wearers Alignment from Good to Neutral or Neutral to Evil and if the wearer has less than half his HP left also drops them from Lawful to Neutral or Neutral to Chaotic...

    Oh yeah, and Boromir is 19 str 14 dex 18 con 8 int 6 wis 17 cha...if he's a fighter then he's a Berzerker...
Sign In or Register to comment.