Half-Elven Ranger/Cleric or Dwarven Fighter/Cleric?
Rik_Kirtaniya
Member Posts: 1,742
The R/C has stealth option (without heavy armour) and free points in Two weapon style, while the Dwarven F/C has better Constitution and super high saves. These are the most obvious differences I can notice at the moment. Which one would you choose?
(And yes, by R/C, I mean the FIXED one, that is, the one which has access to druid spells only upto level 3.)
I think a Dwarven R/C, if it were possible, would have been the best.
(And yes, by R/C, I mean the FIXED one, that is, the one which has access to druid spells only upto level 3.)
I think a Dwarven R/C, if it were possible, would have been the best.
- Half-Elven Ranger/Cleric or Dwarven Fighter/Cleric?17 votes
- Half-Elven Ranger/Cleric35.29%
- Dwarven Fighter/Cleric64.71%
0
Comments
FD is also very nice.
And with "Draw Upon Holy Might" and later Crom Faeyr, you'd probably not need that extra +1 strength from Half-Orc that much, except for the very early stages of BG.
Half orc gives strength immediately while crom takes half of bg2...
Then again there are plenty of potions and items to make any race fine.
Really? Even when high wisdom gives you additional level 6 and 7 spells?
Well, never mind.
it depends also from if you are willing to do the entire saga or start later, if you want to roll the best possible stats or not, and if you plan a party that needs those items, spells and potions or not.
Style points: gnomes are funny.