Skip to content

I think this ''EE'' is a mess.

For the first time I'm playing BG2EE (I only played the originals, the good ones for me); while the ''normal'' stuff is ok, the new companion quests and stuff are messy. Atm I did Neera quest and it was ok, simple. The voice acting is horrible but nvm. I had to follow a guide not to lose the chance to meet Wilson the bear, because Rasaad and Neera quest ''overlap'' and you can miss it. But ok...

Rasaad quest was a mess. He was unconscious in some combat because of some enemy spell, and his dialogues were bugged. Had to reload and remake some part (the last combat, I think) or I was like... ''hello? nothing to say?'' How can you make an EE and new content and fail like this? I don't get it.

Hexxat quest again... bugs. Her dialogues were messed up and had to reload 3 or 4 times... I was playing this quest by inertia, a tomb and 2 crypts or something it was. No clue, but nvm.

I completed those and now I maybe will do Dorn quest (just because I bought this damn thing and content years ago and spent the money, so I have to play it some day) But i'm afraid he will start being annoying trying to ''romance'' my male-elf PC :/ and this is so cringe. Why is this even a thing in D&D? It's enough IRL, to involve a game in these things in a pretentious and forced way... it's a nonsense.

BG was a great game in the originals, the EE's are for me a... travesty. Sorry :D

Comments

  • WisteriasWisterias Member Posts: 169
    Ok so I started Dorn quest rn, and when I travel to the Helmite Camp and when I approach to the guards, they 'welcome' me and it leads to the dialogue and battle in the middle of the camp... but then it loops, and the 'welcome' from the guards starts again, and the battle starts again... I had to reload 3 or 4 times until this was solved. Really? :o

    I have the last update/patch.
  • Humanoid_TaifunHumanoid_Taifun Member Posts: 1,100
    If half-orcs are slapping your butt in real life, perhaps you shouldn't be wiggling your pointy ears so seductively at them.
  • WisteriasWisterias Member Posts: 169
    If half-orcs are slapping your butt in real life, perhaps you shouldn't be wiggling your pointy ears so seductively at them.

    For me this is the less important problem I see with the EE, I will end Dorn quest and kick him off the party. But the rest...
  • TrouveurTrouveur Member Posts: 968
    Wisterias wrote: »
    But i'm afraid he will start being annoying trying to ''romance'' my male-elf PC :/ and this is so cringe. Why is this even a thing in D&D? It's enough IRL, to involve a game in these things in a pretentious and forced way... it's a nonsense.
    LGBTQIA+ people deserve as much as any others to haver some romance options.
    It's a thing in real life yes, so it's a thing in fictions as well.
    How can you know it's done in a pretentious and forced way", since obviously you never played it yet ?

  • WisteriasWisterias Member Posts: 169
    Trouveur wrote: »
    LGBTQIA+...

    People are people, and they don't need all these propaganda acronyms to live 🤷🏼‍♂️. And they don't deserve anything special, in games or wherever. A gay person can play the Aerie or Anomen romance or whatever; it's roleplaying, it doesn't have to reflect your real-life tastes 🙃. Adding these things was unnecessary... wokism and nonsense.

    In a game like baldur's gate it's simply anticlimatic and cringe to me, especially with those abnormal options... a psychopathic half-orc and a repulsive vampire. I avoid romances in this game anyway, so not a big deal.

    I completed Dorn quest. Beautiful helm and not so bad areas, but it was way too easy...

    The only "new" quest that was a little difficult to me was Hexxat crypts and not much.

    I knoe they have more quests in ToB...
  • WisteriasWisterias Member Posts: 169
    In my opinion "less is more", and I guess I will return to the Original Saga after this campaign...
  • atcDaveatcDave Member Posts: 2,712
    Personally I’m always offended by any “Evil” NPCs. So I don’t take them. Easy solution to an easy problem.
    There’s a mod that makes it very easy to just remove any or all EE NPCs from the game.

    I think broadly speaking I’m not a huge fan of Beamdog writing, a few significant exceptions. But their technical merits are outstanding. Fast, stable, better looking, ease of use features I would never choose to play without. I’ll never go back to the originals.
  • TrouveurTrouveur Member Posts: 968
    Wisterias wrote: »
    Trouveur wrote: »
    LGBTQIA+...

    People are people, and they don't need all these propaganda acronyms to live 🤷🏼‍♂️
    It's not "propaganda", it's just how theses peoples call themselves.
    And they don't deserve anything special, in games or wherever.
    They don't ask anything "special", just the same things as the straight people.
    A gay person can play the Aerie or Anomen romance or whatever
    Same as you can play the Dorn romance as a guy, seems like it doesn't please you...
    Adding these things was unnecessary... wokism and nonsense.
    Don't talk for people concerned, don't be insulting please. Non sense is what YOU are saying. Wokism is just being tolerant, you would be a better person trying to do so.
    In a game like baldur's gate it's simply anticlimatic and cringe to me
    It isn't. Gay people also exist in D&D.


  • WisteriasWisterias Member Posts: 169
    atcDave wrote: »
    Personally I’m always offended by any “Evil” NPCs. So I don’t take them. Easy solution to an easy problem.
    There’s a mod that makes it very easy to just remove any or all EE NPCs from the game.

    I think broadly speaking I’m not a huge fan of Beamdog writing, a few significant exceptions. But their technical merits are outstanding. Fast, stable, better looking, ease of use features I would never choose to play without. I’ll never go back to the originals.

    Well as I said I wanted to play the content I paid for, at least 🙃

    I had more important bugs and problems with the EE's than with the Originals, as I said, especially with the new content 🤷🏻‍♂️

    And well for me BG1, the original, was the best looking game, so...
  • WisteriasWisterias Member Posts: 169
    Trouveur wrote: »
    Wisterias wrote: »
    Trouveur wrote: »
    LGBTQIA+...

    People are people, and they don't need all these propaganda acronyms to live 🤷🏼‍♂️
    It's not "propaganda", it's just how theses peoples call themselves.
    And they don't deserve anything special, in games or wherever.
    They don't ask anything "special", just the same things as the straight people.
    A gay person can play the Aerie or Anomen romance or whatever
    Same as you can play the Dorn romance as a guy, seems like it doesn't please you...
    Adding these things was unnecessary... wokism and nonsense.
    Don't talk for people concerned, don't be insulting please. Non sense is what YOU are saying. Wokism is just being tolerant, you would be a better person trying to do so.
    In a game like baldur's gate it's simply anticlimatic and cringe to me
    It isn't. Gay people also exist in D&D.


    D&D people doesn't exist 🙃. The thing is they added those romance options with that goal, to be inclusive; this is pretentious from start. Not to mention, if someone feels excluded for not being able to hook up with a murderous half-orc or a vampire in a videogame... I would be worried.

    Tolerance already existed before being monopolized by a movement like Wokism; it's nothing more than a political/electoral tool (in decline). And yes, that whole acronym mess is a total nonsense.

    P.S., I'm not straight 🤷🏻‍♂️.
Sign In or Register to comment.