Skip to content

[Request] More BG1 NPCs in BG2:EE; ex party members start with you

AndreaColomboAndreaColombo Member Posts: 5,524
BACKGROUND INFO:

There is one thing that has always bothered me about Baldur's Gate II: it took for granted that I had beaten Baldur's Gate with a party composed of Imoen, Jaheira, Khalid, Minsc and Dynaheir; arbitrarily took Khalid and Dynhaeir out of the equation by making them dead; and strong-armed me into recruiting Minsc and Jaheira at the beginning of the game (I'm not going to complain about Imoen since a) she's your closest friend, so her presence kinda makes sense; b) her presence serves the story and can't be discarded). It is true that my first time through Baldur's Gate happened with that very party configuration, but the game shouldn't be making assumptions on my choices and playing style.

Also, I understand that characters in Baldur's Gate II had more psychological depth due to banters, interjections and romances, and that's probably the reason why the number of joinable NPCs got cut from 25 in Baldur's Gate to 17 in Baldur's Gate II (including Sarevok, who is only recruitable in ToB). However, I was severely disappointed not to find some of my old acquaintances in Baldur's Gate II (especially Dynaheir, as I was quite fond of her); or to meet some of them who apparently lost their will to travel with me after being so anxious to do so in Baldur's Gate. The way some of them are dealt with, like Ajantis' ridiculous cameo or Faldorn's spurious presence in the Druids' Groove, was not to my liking at all.

MY REQUEST:

1. It is fine if you're introducing one new NPC to Baldur's Gate in BG:EE, and he should totally carry on with you in BG2:EE as well. However, when it comes to BG2:EE I believe priority should be given to adding more NPCs from BG1, before you wrote new ones in. BG2:EE definitely needs a bigger number of additional joinable NPCs to match BG1, and there are some BG1 characters that are still unaccounted for (e.g. Alora, Eldoth and Skie, Shar'Teel...). It would be really good if they could be there. The alleged death of Dynaheir, as well as the stupid cameo-death of Ajantis, could and should be reversed and the characters added to BG2:EE as joinable NPCs (and make Dynaheir romanceable, for crying out loud! :D). Same applies to Faldorn, Coran and Safana.

2. When importing your final save from BG:EE to start a new game in BG2:EE, your party members should be recognized and, if available as joinable NPCs in BG2:EE, they should be imprisoned with you instead of Minsc and Jaheira. The latter could be made available for recruitment in another game area. Imoen must obviously be there for plot reasons, so at least one of your party members will mandatorily have to be swapped for Imoen.

3. If you start a brand new BG2:EE game without loading your BG:EE final save, the NPCs that start the game with you should be randomized among the BG1 NPCs that are joinable in BG2:EE, and according to CHARNAME's alignment (good with good, evil with evil, anything with neutral). The number of joinable NPCs would still be two plus Imoen, as it is now in BG2, in order to not break the game balance.

I can see a game balance problem with item #2 if a player beats BG:EE with a party comprising five NPCs that are also joinable in BG2:EE. This way, they'd start BG2:EE with a complete party of six as opposed to the current party of four. This can be dealt with in two ways:

a. Make the difficulty of Chateau Irenicus scalable depending on the number of party members you start the game with.

b. Find a way to justify the absence of two random members of your BG:EE party that doesn't involve their death, and make them available for recruitment soon after leaving that dungeon.

And now, I think I'll make a separate thread for scalable difficulty.
AntonWardScooterZakerosZymran86AliteriIngwarr23Dazzutenag314Grumpwagonlars_rosenbergLediathArndasChippyElkarNecdilzorGun19AlejandroDJRankineSirK8BoogeymanAedanXylinabill_zagoudisj0lssonipablo200783Pluc082RinpooFredjoAphrilJalilyego1steParysMrennigmapacekinigomartinezRaistlin82sepotter
«1345

Comments

  • WardWard Member Posts: 1,305
    edited June 2012
    @AndreaColombo

    Looking for a little nookie with the long legged, ebony skinned Dynaheir eh? Watch out, MInsc and boo be their protectors. You break her heart, he break your head!

    But it's worth it.

    I was real sad when I found out I killed Ajantis, he was one of the coolest. I vote we bring Ajantis back and Dynaheir's long ebony legs.
    Necdilzorego1ste
  • WardWard Member Posts: 1,305
    @AndreaColombo

    Her voice always made me wish I was CHARNAME. That plus I'd get to be the all powerful Bhaalspawn. O' course, then I'd have to choose between her and Viconia AND being a God. Two girls, one godhood and Minsc and a hamster named boo.

    I vote we invent virtual reality Baldur's Gate.
    AndreaColomboego1steMrennigma
  • KharadorKharador Member Posts: 215
    I think this request is designed very well thought out but doing this would change the original content of the game. This is something that Trent and others have always said they were not going to do. I also think it would be a costly job and would take time. I think that it isn't a priority.
    nulspace
  • KharadorKharador Member Posts: 215
  • Zymran86Zymran86 Member Posts: 137
    Id rather they add a mix of new and old NPC's into BG 2 (Some returning -Like shar-teel and maybe Eldoth), i think they should add a few NPC's to TOB only aswell, since it doent require that much Party Banter, ToB was quite short.
  • SterlingArcherSterlingArcher Member Posts: 8
    Maybe they could import 1 or 2 at start, but irenicus will kill them in the opening movie?
    This will 1: make the transition a little better and 2: you wont really "change" the game.
    But why would BG1 chars be in athkatla? Some might, but most probably like it around friendly arms inn, it is friendly after all.
    It forces players to play new chars and change their playstyle, Remember most players get a team and dont really change them around much.

    One can always use mods anyways.
  • SterlingArcherSterlingArcher Member Posts: 8
    But why would BG1 chars be in athkatla?.
    Some of them should because they were travelling with you in the first place. Generically stating that they were killed feels like an awkward easy solution to the problem of why they weren't implemented.

    @Thantalas
    Sorry should have clearified that. But i meant BG1 chars that you didnt end bg1 with.

    @thanthalas
    Bg1 npcs not in Amn can also easily being explained by being adventurers .

    There are chars from bg1 that you meet during bg2. so if some dies, some finds other people to travel with, some travel to other places, some settle down, some like it where they are. I think its reasonable to have 4 joinable npcs "left" (I like that some npc in amn have ties to some npc in bg, and some that cant join)
    But i agree the transition could be made smoother, but it probably wont happen since beamdog cant change the original story.

  • nulspacenulspace Member Posts: 100
    edited June 2012
    I can't really say that I agree with changing the story content. I honestly don't like messing with the canonical events.

    Add more BG1 NPCs to BG2? Sure. But don't mess with the story. Let you recruit them outside Chateau Irenicus.
    I agree with @Tanthalas here, not only to preserve the OC of BG2, but because it would be a programming nightmare. Think of the variability that it would introduce, especially if one of the BG1/BG2 NPCs with me initially in Irenicus' dungeon is integral to another major quest later on (Edwin, for example, being tied into the Thieves Stronghold quest). Not only does this introduce a dynamic Irenicus dungeon, but it introduces a dynamic Thieves Stronghold quest.

    Not to mention the potential nightmare of trying to account for the death of an NPC in BG1 (heck, I had Minsc beat Dynaheir to death in BG1 just so that he and Edwin didn't fight, only to learn that somehow she survived and then got killed by Irenicus! What gives?) .

    All that being said, I think that it's totally viable to add a few of the BG1 NPCs (that weren't killed off by Irenicus 3: sorry Dynaheir) to the game. One mod that does this nearly seamlessly is the Kivan & Deheriana mod:
    http://www.gibberlings3.net/kivan/index.php

    The mod comes complete with subquests and dialogue between CHARNAME and Kivan. I haven't played to the endgame parts of it, but apparently Deheriana can become a joinable NPC as well. It even ties in with seeing Tazok again in Firekraag's temple.

    I think minor tweaks to allow for a few of these instances would be perfectly acceptable without severely altering the original content of the game.
    AndreaColomboTanthalasMajoritas
  • AndreaColomboAndreaColombo Member Posts: 5,524
    I agree with @Tanthalas here, not only to preserve the OC of BG2, but because it would be a programming nightmare. Think of the variability that it would introduce, especially if one of the BG1/BG2 NPCs with me initially in Irenicus' dungeon is integral to another major quest later on (Edwin, for example, being tied into the Thieves Stronghold quest). Not only does this introduce a dynamic Irenicus dungeon, but it introduces a dynamic Thieves Stronghold quest.
    You are correct. I hadn't thought of that. Looks like I'll settle for requesting more BG1 NPCs, then (though Dynhaeir's death is totally reversible, we never even see her corpse *suspicious emoticon*).
    nulspace
  • kamuizinkamuizin Member Posts: 3,704
    1° of all, this will never be done cos it is a change in the original history (unseless the beamdog use my position of extend but not break the contract of rights lended, as make all those new options but let the original option avaliable too).

    But ok, lets assume it will be done:

    1° of all: characters as dynaheir, khalid, ajantis, safana and coran MUST die, otherwise that will be a direct change in the original history, however this doesn't mean the game can't provide us a way to ressurect them after their death no? :D.

    In my view dynaheir and khalid can't be ressurected, do this will eventually offend the original history in a way or another (Minsc will never take aerie as a new witch for example and Jaheira option of relationship would be screwed), so those character's final death MUST happen.

    About adjantis, a way to revive the paladins the party is tricked in kill (in a quest for example) is viable, a way to stop the werewolfs to kill safana and coran also is viable (it's not a plot kill safana has if i remember well, if not she must die and be reborn to preserve the original content)

    But i really understand you point brother, anyway if not done in a official fashion, as soon the game is launched fan mods will be done to cover that and would be really better in a official way with no bugs or incompatibility.

    About the Imoem presence in Irenicus Dungeon, if imoem where not in the party she can justify this by tell main char how she was captured (cos irenicus know from the begin that imoem and main char are alike, so if he contract a group to kidnap the main char party, why not for Imoem too).

    however i don't see a way to remove Jaheira and Minsc from the Irenicus Dungeon cos that would prevent the death of Dynaheir and Khalid. It's a big flaw on the consistency of the history... but is the original content.


    Justify that probally will not be take but somehow save the original content cos as the topic owner said, it's a really flaw the permanent Minsc and Jaheira party members:


    Irenicus is only after the main char, so why take everyone to the dungeon? So in my point of view Jaheira and Khalid follow the kidnapers to the dungeon as a debt for old Gorion, and Minsc followed them to to save a friend or take revenge from main char (if he killed dynaheir at the request of edwin in BG).
    AndreaColombowendigo
  • AndreaColomboAndreaColombo Member Posts: 5,524
    My chances of romancing Dynaheir are getting slimmer by the post.
    nulspaceartificial_sunlight
  • DeeDee Member Posts: 10,447
    The problem there is that her death is Minsc's only character development in BG2. If she doesn't die in Irenicus's dungeon, Minsc never chooses Aerie as his new witch.

    Also, if Irenicus only kills Khalid, he's less intimidating. As sad as Dynaheir's death is...that's kind of the point. ;)
    Scooter
  • AndreaColomboAndreaColombo Member Posts: 5,524
    If UB was implemented, Minsc would get a nifty Boo-related quest that could more than make up for the character development determined by Dynaheir's death... but yeah, I see bringing her back would cause more problems than it would solve. Alas.
  • kamuizinkamuizin Member Posts: 3,704
    If UB was implemented, Minsc would get a nifty Boo-related quest that could more than make up for the character development determined by Dynaheir's death... but yeah, I see bringing her back would cause more problems than it would solve. Alas.
    However a fan mod can still be done to cover this, and beamdog can unnoficially support that too, by making a review of the fan work (they have the source code after all), it's just a question of let it unnoficial and don't shout to the four winds that they did that :).

    After all BG:EE is more a tribute work made by ppl that respect and like the game than a exclusive company business with only money in mind (money is needed too, but is not the main point of this project i believe).
  • gesellegeselle Member Posts: 325
    Reminds me when i played ToB for the first time, the aspect told he could summon former companions. For a second i was like "HOLY GUACAMOLE, I will finally fill my ranks with some evil characters from BG"; well turned out he was talking about npcs from BG2....
  • DeeDee Member Posts: 10,447
    Oh man. If you could have Quayle and Aerie and Jan in the same party... Oh man.
    nulspaceAndreaColombo
  • kamuizinkamuizin Member Posts: 3,704
    edited June 2012
    My character dream for BG2 is Shar Tell, i really like her and a deep history for her would be nice, eldoth and skie would be cool in BG2 too.

    now a really but really cool NPC to find in BG2 from BG would be Tamoko if the party spare her in the end of BG1, i never saw a mod to bring her, but as a NPC in BG2 she could develop a lot the sarevok true history during the game and when the game reach ToB, wow that would be nice :)! But just dreaming here, i doubt this happens.
    RedGuardIllustair
  • gesellegeselle Member Posts: 325
    edited June 2012
    Recruiting Tamoko would break canon as far as i know. In Sarevok's ending scene it is mentioned, that he buries her in Karatur; And in Ascension it was mentioned that Yoshimo is a relative, maybe brother, of Tamoko, and her death/disappearence caused Yoshimo to hunt for the PC.
    Thinking of this matter, Tamoko would've been a great choice for a good natured character, who spares her in late BG and takes her along BG2, unfortunately its not gonna happen.
    And yeah, Shar-Teel for Baldur's Gate 2 would bring the shake.
    Post edited by geselle on
    AndreaColombo
  • AndreaColomboAndreaColombo Member Posts: 5,524
    I agree. Tamoko as a joinable NPC would be positively awesome.
  • DrugarDrugar Member Posts: 1,566
    Personally, I would love to see Xzar and/or Montaron start with you in BG2, instead of Minsc/Jaheira. But as was already pointed out, that would not only break the start of BG2 but also later quests (the harper quest, in this case). Unfortunately, this won't happen.
    Can't believe nobody's modded it though, shouldn't be too hard to replace Xzar with a generic evil mage if he's already in the party, or make it a sidequest of him.

    On another note, I heartily endorse a Tamoko NPC mod!
    This even makes Yoshimo more tragic. If his original motivation for taking the job to bring Charname to Spellhold was motivated by revenge for the death/disappearance of Tamoko, imagine his surprise when he finds her alive but he's geased into betraying her and the person who spared her life when she was willing to throw it away.
    It'd be a great tragedy!
    Syntia13
  • DazzuDazzu Member Posts: 950
    edited June 2012
    Hopefully all NPCs have viable stats. Quayle's 68 stat total is sad when compared to say the 80 average of BG2 npcs.

    As well, it'd be nice if all NPCs had their niche. Why would I ever recruit Safana or Skie over Dual classable, better statted Imoen?
  • kamuizinkamuizin Member Posts: 3,704
    edited June 2012
    Hopefully all NPCs have viable stats. Quayle's 68 stat total is sad when compared to say the 80 average of BG2 npcs.

    As well, it'd be nice if all NPCs had their niche. Why would I ever recruit Safana or Skie over Dual classable, better statted Imoen?
    After the 100° playtrough (and believe me i literally played this game in more than 150 playtroughs, i really don't understand why i can't become bored with the game, i just don't) you will see that the history and relation betwen npcs become more important than his/her status.

    Edit: my playtroughs, most of them where a BG2 start and i didn't end trone of bhaal always on them, just to note.
  • DazzuDazzu Member Posts: 950
    I'm not sure I understand what you're getting at based on confused wordage. If I understand correctly, then I have these disagreements:

    BG1 NPCs don't really interact and the EE isn't changing that.

    This is BG1 we're dealing with. BG2 NPCs tend to have plenty of their own persona.
  • wendigowendigo Member Posts: 46
    1° of all, this will never be done cos it is a change in the original history (unseless the beamdog use my position of extend but not break the contract of rights lended, as make all those new options but let the original option avaliable too).

    But ok, lets assume it will be done:

    1° of all: characters as dynaheir, khalid, ajantis, safana and coran MUST die, otherwise that will be a direct change in the original history, however this doesn't mean the game can't provide us a way to ressurect them after their death no? :D.

    In my view dynaheir and khalid can't be ressurected, do this will eventually offend the original history in a way or another (Minsc will never take aerie as a new witch for example and Jaheira option of relationship would be screwed), so those character's final death MUST happen.

    About adjantis, a way to revive the paladins the party is tricked in kill (in a quest for example) is viable, a way to stop the werewolfs to kill safana and coran also is viable (it's not a plot kill safana has if i remember well, if not she must die and be reborn to preserve the original content)

    But i really understand you point brother, anyway if not done in a official fashion, as soon the game is launched fan mods will be done to cover that and would be really better in a official way with no bugs or incompatibility.

    About the Imoem presence in Irenicus Dungeon, if imoem where not in the party she can justify this by tell main char how she was captured (cos irenicus know from the begin that imoem and main char are alike, so if he contract a group to kidnap the main char party, why not for Imoem too).

    however i don't see a way to remove Jaheira and Minsc from the Irenicus Dungeon cos that would prevent the death of Dynaheir and Khalid. It's a big flaw on the consistency of the history... but is the original content.


    Justify that probally will not be take but somehow save the original content cos as the topic owner said, it's a really flaw the permanent Minsc and Jaheira party members:


    Irenicus is only after the main char, so why take everyone to the dungeon? So in my point of view Jaheira and Khalid follow the kidnapers to the dungeon as a debt for old Gorion, and Minsc followed them to to save a friend or take revenge from main char (if he killed dynaheir at the request of edwin in BG).

    I´m from Brasil (that have many old fans) and my english is not so good (sorry for that), but lets go:

    the best in BG is the history of the game and of the caracters. the original history is great, but the possibilities of an old BG1 NPC started in BG2 could be taken into account if help of MODs created by fans who wants to do anything to reverse death of old friends like Dynaheir... I imagine that cost lot of work, but thats the point of outsource the work to MOD creators fans. that way, everyone would be covered.

    but any changes should be made ​​carefully, because what makes the BG today is the glorious history of the game, the characters and the interaction between them.
    Necdilzor
Sign In or Register to comment.