Is Greater Malison effect cumulative?

Comments

• lunar Member Posts: 3,417

  January 2015 edited January 2015

  Umm it does not stack, and does not bypass mr.

  

  3 · Share on Google+ Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
• elminster Member, Developer Posts: 16,213

  January 2015

  Its not cumulative and it can be resisted by magic resistance.

  

  4 · Share on Google+ Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
• lunar Member Posts: 3,417

  January 2015

  elminster said:

  Its not cumulative and it can be resisted by magic resistance.

  What he said, I checked with dltcep and fixed my post.
  
  

  

  1 · Share on Google+ Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
• composter Member Posts: 24

  November 2015

  it cumulative !!! i use NearInfinity and open spwi412.spl , modifier type for Greater Malison - Increment (0) , it the same for Lower Resistance.
  

  

  1 · Share on Google+ Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
• Gallowglass Member Posts: 3,356

  November 2015

  @composter - are you looking at original BG2 or BG2ee? I have a vague recollection that this may have been one of the things fixed in the EEs.

  0 · Share on Google+ Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
• elminster Member, Developer Posts: 16,213

  December 2015

  composter said:

  it cumulative !!! i use NearInfinity and open spwi412.spl , modifier type for Greater Malison - Increment (0) , it the same for Lower Resistance.
  

  While there did you happen to see a line called "Remove Effects By Resource"? That removes the effects of the previous casting of Greater Malison.

  

  3 · Share on Google+ Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
• composter Member Posts: 24

  December 2015

  you right

  0 · Share on Google+ Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
• [Deleted User] Posts: 0

  December 2015

  The user and all related content has been deleted.

  

  1 · Share on Google+ Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
• semiticgoddess Member Posts: 14,800

  December 2015

  @subtledoctor: There's a lot of stuff that goes into making a game. It's not surprising Bioware never came up with that opcode. They already made 300 others; I'm sure a list that long would have seemed pretty comprehensive at the time.
  
  I view opcode 321 as an example of a Beamdog innovation, not a Bioware mistake.

  0 · Share on Google+ Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
• [Deleted User] Posts: 0

  December 2015 edited December 2015

  The user and all related content has been deleted.

  

  2 · Share on Google+ Share on TwitterShare on Facebook