Skip to content

Should Clerics and Druids get Minor Spell Sequencer and Spell Sequencer?

2»

Comments

  • the_spyderthe_spyder Member Posts: 5,018
    In my opinion, wizards an druids/clerics are different. Divine casters generally have more going for them than magic. I say divine casters shouldn't get sequencer spells.
  • AstroBryGuyAstroBryGuy Member Posts: 3,437
    This sounds like a limitation of the engine, like Ranger/Clerics having access to all divine spells. Sequencers/contingencies are an advantage of arcane classes. No reason to give it to all divine casters.

    One thing I would like to see "imported" from 3E is spontaneous casting of healing spells.
  • ZanathKariashiZanathKariashi Member Posts: 2,869
    Or the actual 2nd edition reversible mechanic...which was very similar (easily do-able too, though they'd have to add the cause wounds version of every cure spell, there's currently a couple missing).

    Though instead of converting any spell to heal or inflict like 3rd edition, you just chose at the time of casting whether to Cure or Cause X wounds for the healing spell. And it also applies to Heal (Harm), Raise Dead (Slay Living), and Resurrection (Destruction).
Sign In or Register to comment.