Skip to content

So what's up with BG 3 and what would you like to see it be?

Ever since these remakes of my favorite RPG came out, I've been looking at what's been said about the possibility of BG 3 being a possible project. I'm excited about this, because if it continues the original storyline then your main character and the NPC's that transfer through will attain a ridiculous level and I would like to see what they do with new abilities for these levels. I only have two real concerns though that I feel are relevant. One is that I'm worried they might deviate from the established storyline which is a huge turn off for me as a day-one player. By that I mean that I think they might do their own thing with BG 3 if they make it, and while that could make for a great game, it might be a kick in the nuts for the people who played when BG was on six disks. That concern aside, my real worry is what rule set they will implement if they make the game. I know 4e is the new thing out there, and while I haven't played 4e yet, I haven't heard much in it's favor either. Now mind you, I don't know anything about 4e rules or gameplay, I just know that I've been told it's poorly balanced and some have even said that it really sucks compared to 3e and the 3.5 revisions. I've been playing 3e and 3.5 for a good long while now, probably not since it came out, but for a long time. I know most of the content of that rule set and I have to say that I was happy with what NWN did with 3e. People in the older posts here have been saying that "IF" they make BG 3 it would "HAVE" to be 4e and to be frank, that notion in ridiculous. Personally, I believe that 3e and the 3.5 revisions are very well balanced minus a few points like Deathless Frenzy and other similar game breaker capable character abilities. Not to mention the plethora of content available for 3e, if you count any of the non WOTC books there are in the area of 90+ books to draw from. And even if you don't include non WOTC content there are still a ridiculous number of classes, monsters, feats, spells, prestige classes, playable races, etc. Five Monster Manuals, Fiend Folio, Complete Mage, Complete Divine, Book of Exalted Deeds, Book of Vile Darkness, and on, and on. I would love to see the complexity that 3e and 3.5 offers brought to life in its entirety. Multi-classing beyond two classes, meta magic feats, monstrous races for PC's, actual feats when you level, the complete collection of available spells and class features, you know, playing a warlock/fighter that can use hideous blow through his full blade because you have the option of taking exotic weapon proficiencies... that kind of stuff. Now tell me that last sentence didn't make you at LEAST think of the possibilities a bit more than before. Playing a Dragon Wrought kobold, or implementing actual skill checks, allowing you to make your own build and not just some cookie cutter pre fabricated character. I don't know about you guys, but I would pay 100+ dollars, right now, for a game that accurately presented all 3e - 3.5 materials in their entirety. And I would probably play it until my fingers fell off and my eyes bled, and then I still might try with my feet by ear. I've heard it said that the amount of work it would take to make such a monster of gaming would be massive, and I agree with that. But God help the rest of the RPG world when a company does make such a game, because they're going to flood the block with it and absolutely decimate any semblance of competition in their franchise. I can see Beam Dog metaphorically disemboweling gaming giants like Blizzard with a masterpiece of such epic magnitude. To hell with WOW, let's see MMORPG BG 3 with single player functionality and full 3e - 3.5 content... and BOOM goes the dynamite. A nuke to the gaming world leaving nothing but shadows on the concrete, the only remains of once proud companies that thought they knew what an RPG was, but woe to the ignorant fools, they had not truly seen the sun, for it was only just the dawn... a bit much? I can see gamers putting down their dice and grabbing keyboards and mice like they had been poisoned and the antidote was in their computer. I see the bar being raised to an unattainable level in the RPG world and the stragglers being left forever in the dark. In short, I see a new standard of gaming excellence only inches from Beam Dog's fingers. An RPG that was instantly accepted as an awesome triumph, more that ten years dead, risen like the Phoenix, and the possibility of a sequel to bring the Lord of Murder back onto the field with the massively expanded possibilities of 3e - 3.5 content. Two things that come to mind are the Epic Level Handbook and The Book of Elder Evils for things that could challenge a God. Maybe Asmodeous, or possibly Orcis, the possibilities are so open it's ridiculous. Maybe our character has offended the Gods by ascending from a mortal and we have to duke it out with Helm or Mystra, who knows? No one, that's who, unless someone makes the game. All I can tell you is that if such a game were to come into being, I would throw down mighty on it! Sorry for the REDICULOUSLY long post, but God I'm excited about the possibilities for BG 3... anyone who made it to the bottom of my ranting, please let me know your opinion. :)
«1

Comments

  • KalenvexKalenvex Member Posts: 6
    Thanks for the tip lol, I really should have gone with some indents and separation of ideas there. :) Any feedback on the rant though? I know it's all just talk right now, but it might be real eventually, and it's fun to speculate.

  • jackjackjackjack Member Posts: 3,251
    I'd like to see it remain a what might have been - the story is done, and recent attempts by Wizards have confirmed my fear that any continuation of it will inevitably fail.
    I'd much rather see a new story.
  • the_spyderthe_spyder Member Posts: 5,018
    You know what might be an interesting idea? If the took ToB and completely reworked it. I'm talking a total overhaul. Strip the story back to starting at the end of SoA and then creating a whole game as fully developed and realized as BG2, in short the story that TOB was supposed to be. Create the same open ended story. Allow the player to explore an entire gamescape as wide and diverse as BG2. That could be cool.
  • the_spyderthe_spyder Member Posts: 5,018
    See, that's what I get for not reading the fine print.

    In my personal view, MMO games are not RPG games. People play them for different reasons than they play RPG games. They target a different market and, although there are crossovers, generally the one would not make a very good version of the other (either way).
  • vyvexthornevyvexthorne Member Posts: 58
    To continue with the same character the game would have to take place in some sort of realm of the gods or something. The level you reach is so far removed from Faerûn. Imoen is almost on par with Elminster by the end of it all and she's just your sidekick.

    However, It would be interesting if it used your character as some sort of backdrop for the next game. You wouldn't continue with that character but things that character did would have some sort of impact.
  • NecomancerNecomancer Member Posts: 622
    I'd like to see BG3 be IWD:EE.

    ...What? I still think BG3 is a terrible idea. It'd be forced to use the new system, the story of BG is complete so it'd be BG in name only for the most part, new players might try it but be confused by the sudden change in story and gameplay and old players would have little interest in it because most of us are old enough to realize making sequels to really old games nearly never works out unless its a complete redoing of the entire thing and even then failure is pretty likely.

    I'd much rather have IWD:EE
  • CrevsDaakCrevsDaak Member Posts: 7,155
    edited April 2014

    Holy wall of text, Batman!/blockquote>

    Fixed that for ya.

    Your awesome sir @the_spyder‌!
    Post edited by CrevsDaak on
  • meaglothmeagloth Member Posts: 3,806
    I know people think that SoA is the bestest thing ever, but I would like to see a SoA where a start with the party members I had in bg1, and a reworked ToB. This is essentially a whole new game, and is completely ridiculous considering the size of the ee team, and then the team of lawyers that would be nesesary to even have a shot at the rights.
  • the_spyderthe_spyder Member Posts: 5,018
    I bow to your Awesomeness @Anduin!!!!!
  • BelanosBelanos Member Posts: 968
    I agree that the Baldur's Gate series has run it's course. In order to continue the storyline, Charname would have to deal with gods and would need to become a god him/herself. That would just be taking things too far. The only plausible scenario for a Baldur's Gate 3 for me would be a completely different storyline that was based in the area around Baldur's Gate, just like the two Neverwinter games. But then it would bear no relationship to the first two titles at all, especially since Wizards of the Sword Coast would insist on having 4th edition rules be used for it. It would be a Baldur's Gate game only in name.
  • TwaniTwani Member Posts: 640
    I fear asking for Baldur's Gate will just get us more Dark Alliance styled games. Which... no... please no.

    More likely, if we get a BG3, it'll be set in Baldur's Gate after the Spellplague with fourth edition rules. Everyone from BG would be dead, save for perhaps the elves (all the dwarves in the game are pretty old, or in Korgan's case, die triumphantly) (and Aerie and Xan will likely be dead as well, considering how mages faired during the Spellplague). We might see a few decedents of the characters ("Hi, I'm Coran's child! Look at this tie in! Yay!"), but it would probably be pretty ham-fistedly done. It wouldn't be the characters we know and love, and... comparing Dorn, Rasaad, Neera, and Hexxat to well, Anomen, Viconia, Aerie, and Jaheira... I'm not sure I'd want the new characters, as character writing doesn't seem to be the team's strongest point.

    Personally, I'm hoping we see Icewind Dale/II or Planescape: Torment enhanced, instead.
  • CrevsDaakCrevsDaak Member Posts: 7,155
    Anduin said:

    And Imoen gives birth to 1/4 Bhaalspawn.

    I can't.

    I'm sterile.
  • thesoloerthesoloer Member Posts: 77
    If there is a BG3, it wouldn't be made by Bioware. So why should I buy it?
  • elminsterelminster Member, Developer Posts: 16,317
    IWD3!
  • elminsterelminster Member, Developer Posts: 16,317
    edited April 2014
    thesoloer said:

    If there is a BG3, it wouldn't be made by Bioware. So why should I buy it?

    Well looking at DA2, ME3, and TOR....I'd say because it wouldn't be made by Bioware :p

    That said I don't think Overhaul is large enough for this kind of an undertaking either.
  • AnduinAnduin Member Posts: 5,745
    CrevsDaak said:

    Anduin said:

    And Imoen gives birth to 1/4 Bhaalspawn.

    I can't.

    I'm sterile.
    I thought it was more due to the fact your a boy?

    Also... Never say never!

    I intend to wait until 2020 when BG3, is re-released for 3D holo projector tv's that beam everything in isometric view...
  • elminsterelminster Member, Developer Posts: 16,317
    I'm willing to wait it out until 2040, when I hope there will be some kind of holodeck that I can just walk into and then play as charname :D
  • davendaven Member Posts: 112
    No. No point, dunno how many times it needs to be said.

    BG is finished, its over! Make something new. Same goes for movies stop it with the reboots, sequels and all that bollocks. Sick of it.
  • CrevsDaakCrevsDaak Member Posts: 7,155
    Anduin said:

    CrevsDaak said:

    Anduin said:

    And Imoen gives birth to 1/4 Bhaalspawn.

    I can't.

    I'm sterile.
    I thought it was more due to the fact your a boy?
    Yeah, I was just joking and role playing as Imoen.
  • meaglothmeagloth Member Posts: 3,806
    Actually, @Anduin‌'s idea is pretty good. I hadn't really thought about it, but you could be Arie's baby! Everybody would want to be that, right?!!!
    :P
  • AnduinAnduin Member Posts: 5,745
    @meagloth‌

    As Boo's offspring... I'm not sure if I could handle the ancestral awesomeness of being Airie's love child as well...

    Can't really understand all the negativity about not making BG3?

    Baldur's Gate is better than Final Fantasy, James Bond, Spiderman and The Wurzels combined (Okay, I pushed the envelope to the limit including The Wurzels...)

    They have been around for ages, new material is still being produced, and they all pretty much rock!
    (Especially The Wurzels cause they have rocking chairs...)
  • meaglothmeagloth Member Posts: 3,806
    Yea, really. If we can have ~345.7 final fantasy games we can have 3 Baldur's Gateses.
  • jackjackjackjack Member Posts: 3,251
    But look at how terrible that series was after FF6.
  • MacHurtoMacHurto Member Posts: 731
    He got the nose from his mom
Sign In or Register to comment.