Spell immunity vs maze : it doesn't protect?
LordSith
Member Posts: 7
hi,
As an old player of BG2 but a new comer to BG2EE I tried some new strategies I never considered.
I was in a 1vs1 fight with the elemental lich and because I already fought the shade lich, I knew she would probably use Maze which was a pain because it "resetted" the spell slot to my innate number (not counting items bonuses).
So I checked the school of maze, invocation, and cast spell immunity just before the fight, and choose the evocation subset (since invocation doesn't exist and I remember from the old pnp I played that evocation/invocation is one school).
Then the fight begin... the lich use maze as anticipate.... and it worked??
Shouldn't it have failed?
It won't harm the fight, i'm still gonna win this but I will have to use my old sword after dispelling his protections or just waiting, which is the opposite of "new strategy" for me (because that's what I always have done in the past...).
Thanks for your answer,
As an old player of BG2 but a new comer to BG2EE I tried some new strategies I never considered.
I was in a 1vs1 fight with the elemental lich and because I already fought the shade lich, I knew she would probably use Maze which was a pain because it "resetted" the spell slot to my innate number (not counting items bonuses).
So I checked the school of maze, invocation, and cast spell immunity just before the fight, and choose the evocation subset (since invocation doesn't exist and I remember from the old pnp I played that evocation/invocation is one school).
Then the fight begin... the lich use maze as anticipate.... and it worked??
Shouldn't it have failed?
It won't harm the fight, i'm still gonna win this but I will have to use my old sword after dispelling his protections or just waiting, which is the opposite of "new strategy" for me (because that's what I always have done in the past...).
Thanks for your answer,
0
Comments
Thanks for your answer.