Meeting the Minds Queest
HarpyProductions
Member Posts: 20
Why cant i actualy join the conspiracy to kill the council of four? i really wanted to be part of that quest. them betray the 4 guys too when i am done killing the council of 4.
0
Comments
In baldurs gate 2 if imoen dies, irenicus could just get the PC soul and let bodhi without it. imoen is really useless there. bodhi was already immortal thanks to vampirism. she may just not mind, or if she minds. irenicus could get away with violent. or non violent ways.
the moral is, just because you think they are needed. it does not mean they are. other people will find ways of geting the plot complete even without these characters.
as i said i did not finished SOD yet. so i dont know an alternative way. but when i finish i will come back here and talk about it
ploting against the dukes wont derail the campaign in anyway. you can still do everything else, if you dont get caught. or even if you do get caught. people might still want you alive to use you against caelar. this would give a new meaning to when lancie try to sacrifice you to caelar in order to stop the war.
i dont see how you think the story depends on them being alive by the end. that is totaly nonsensical. if they did not existed nothing at all would change.
so there is really no reason why we are not allowed to do this mission other than developers did not thought about we wanting to pick a more murderous approach. ironic considering how you can always do evil things. so i guess its just lazyness.
not that i care anymore. already gave up on this disapointment of a game when i finished it and got the conclusion that its a disapointment. i wont bother moding it
People harshly criticize it because even a kid of 12 years old could make it. Am I exagerating? I've made cringe content too but I had 12 years old when I did that and still it was better than what I've seen.
There are some good things about Sod, namely encounters, the quest C&C, but it all proves ultimately useless due to how derailed the story is and how silly it is.
You don't even feel the weight of what you've done in Sod inside Baldur's gate 2 and people talk about the same being about BG1. But sorry, it was not I that claimed that SoD would be the bridge between these two games. A bridge that is actually floating separated by the other two parts; and when you talk about how things are certainly bad, you are going to get criticized hashly
The dregs of the Sword Coast fill our streets. Demand for goods is rising, and prices will follow-we'll see to it. You will speak out about the Council's inability to deal with the situation.
People will listen to the hero of Baldur's Gate. You will help us topple the Grand Dukes one by one. And we shall be there to take the reins of power.
A coup d'etat means a lot more than just strolling into the Ducal Palace and hacking the dukes to death. It could practically be a plotline on its own.
This is just another complaint that the game doesn't inexplicably let your low-INT low-WIS Chaotic Evil PC get away with wholesale slaughter.
It's generally a good idea to actually know the plot before critiquing it.
it is not a complain about not geting away with it. its a complain about not being able to do it. before you can get away with anything you need to do it.
by the way. any anarchist could be against higher autority and some may consider these high autority to be evil by just using of the power they have, in example. taking taxes. so you dont need to be chaotic evil to want to kill the autority. thing that would be justifiable and good in the minds of these characters.
but if we are going to discuss about it. it will be like talking about what this plotline could have been. it might be fun