I think we've gone off topic here. This isn't a BG vs IWD thread, this is how the EE changes are gonna trivialize so much while other aspects get shafted. If anyone minds returning to topic, please?
I think we've gone off topic here. This isn't a BG vs IWD thread, this is how the EE changes are gonna trivialize so much while other aspects get shafted. If anyone minds returning to topic, please?
And our argument here is that BGEE's changes aren't going to trivialize encounters that are just out-and-out really hard. That's DIRECTLY on topic.
Also, which aspects, precisely, are going to "get shafted"?
Honestly, I have lost more characters to those two stupid goblin archers in Easthaven and the three wolves in that first area outside of Easthaven than I have against Tarnesh.
Honestly, I have lost more characters to those two stupid goblin archers in Easthaven and the three wolves in that first area outside of Easthaven than I have against Tarnesh.
Maybe it's because you can prepare well (or even cheese) against Tarnesh, but have to take on the goblins quite fairly. Thing is, Tarnesh would oftentimes target Charname and kill him outright. The goblin archers might hurt or even kill anyone, that doesn't mean it's game over. Most people would reload, of course, but voluntarily. Tarnesh forces you to.
Overall, I'd say BG is more swingy in the beginning, but IWD is harder. You have to powergame more to make it. Still, I don't think the introduction of BG2 stuff and the cheese that goes along with it will really do IWD good.
Honestly, I have lost more characters to those two stupid goblin archers in Easthaven and the three wolves in that first area outside of Easthaven than I have against Tarnesh.
Maybe it's because you can prepare well (or even cheese) against Tarnesh, but have to take on the goblins quite fairly. Thing is, Tarnesh would oftentimes target Charname and kill him outright. The goblin archers might hurt or even kill anyone, that doesn't mean it's game over. Most people would reload, of course, but voluntarily. Tarnesh forces you to.
Overall, I'd say BG is more swingy in the beginning, but IWD is harder. You have to powergame more to make it. Still, I don't think the introduction of BG2 stuff and the cheese that goes along with it will really do IWD good.
The cheese doesn't do BG2 any good, either. That's why you just don't do it if you don't want to deal with it, and roll your eyes at everybody who cheeses their way through a solo run with their Kensai/Mage that makes a hasted Simulacrum run as far from the battle as possible.
Honestly, I have lost more characters to those two stupid goblin archers in Easthaven and the three wolves in that first area outside of Easthaven than I have against Tarnesh.
Maybe it's because you can prepare well (or even cheese) against Tarnesh, but have to take on the goblins quite fairly. Thing is, Tarnesh would oftentimes target Charname and kill him outright. The goblin archers might hurt or even kill anyone, that doesn't mean it's game over. Most people would reload, of course, but voluntarily. Tarnesh forces you to.
Both result in character deaths. Having more than one character doesn't change that. I have actually had my entire party wiped out by the wolves next door.
No offense, but this is the most pathetic way to try to defend a poorly balanced game.
Something like that can be use when it comes to options, such as "hide helm", mods or cheats, but otherwise it is completely inexcusable.
Items will not be so bad. IWD have much larger groups of strong enemies than BG, so it is logical that we will need some sort of advantage. Probably we can allow most of the kits from BG2:EE (with narrowed eyes), but certainly not Dwarven Defender with his crazy tanking capabilities (he should not even be in BG).
Another problem will be magic. BG2 have MUCH more strong spells then IWD and I'm talking mainly about the incredibly strong AOE spells. Even if you limit scrolls, sorcerer will still be able to use them all.
IWD:EE will need much more than a simple transfer of content from BG.
Meh unless you plan on doing a lot of saving and then rest/reload/rest (until successful) your access to spells is going to be limited by the frequency that you are ambushed by enemies when you attempt to rest in IWD (which in most areas happens a lot). That is on top of either your specific choices as a sorcerer/your access to mage scrolls.
Same goes with any ability you have a limited number of activations for.
No offense, but this is the most pathetic way to try to defend a poorly balanced game.
Something like that can be use when it comes to options, such as "hide helm", mods or cheats, but otherwise it is completely inexcusable.
Items will not be so bad. IWD have much larger groups of strong enemies than BG, so it is logical that we will need some sort of advantage. Probably we can allow most of the kits from BG2:EE (with narrowed eyes), but certainly not Dwarven Defender with his crazy tanking capabilities (he should not even be in BG).
Another problem will be magic. BG2 have MUCH more strong spells then IWD and I'm talking mainly about the incredibly strong AOE spells. Even if you limit scrolls, sorcerer will still be able to use them all.
IWD:EE will need much more than a simple transfer of content from BG.
It's too late. The game is already theoretically broken. Hence, if you don't like it, don't use it. If we're going to tweak and balance things, how about Dual-Classing and Multi-Classing producing do-it-all-solo god characters? Because they really aren't, I simply won't use them. I don't want them to adjust or remove the Dwarven Defender, because Dwarven Defender doesn't even compare with Mage, Dual-Class, and Muti-Class cheese.
@Schneidend Dual-Class, and Muti-Class mages are strong only on high levels. In IWD where you start on lvl 1, are these do-it-all-solo god characters rather a nuisance.
@Schneidend Dual-Class, and Muti-Class mages are strong only on high levels. In IWD where you start on lvl 1, are these do-it-all-solo god characters rather a nuisance.
The Dwarven Defender and most of the other kits don't come into their own until higher levels, either. I'd say the only classes that are extraordinarily strong from level 1 are Skald and Jester, who get their best ability right away.
Barbarians are really powerful at level 1, so are berserkers. Clerics are crazy at lvl 1 if played aggressively, and so on. They grow relatively less powerful as they progress though, and we can all accept core DnD concepts like duals and multis, just like we accept the quadratic BG wizard... however, new badly unbalanced stuff will stick out badly.
There are several shields which will cause some people *not* to dual-wield. The Argent Shield (yes, elf/half-elf only but 25% MR is a hefty bonus)...Great Shield +3 (15% resist physical attacks)...Sundered Shield of Tiernon...Shield of the Revenant...The Red Knight's Shield...Mystery of the Dead...and those are only the ones I can recall with relative ease.
Barbarians are really powerful at level 1, so are berserkers. Clerics are crazy at lvl 1 if played aggressively, and so on. They grow relatively less powerful as they progress though, and we can all accept core DnD concepts like duals and multis, just like we accept the quadratic BG wizard... however, new badly unbalanced stuff will stick out badly.
I don't consider characters that have a powerful 1/day ability at first level as being necessarily strong at first level. Random encounters caused by resting happen a lot in the IWD franchise, so resting cheese isn't as abusable as in BG. Once they get multiple uses, then yes they blossom into something really potent.
And, no, I don't accept those concepts. That's why I don't use them often. I hate quadratic wizard design. I tolerate it, because they have plenty of cool spells that don't break the game and having the wizard sprites in a party add variety. Fighter/Thief and Fighter/Cleric are good multi-class combos that I am comfortable with, but all this nonsense with things like Swashbuckler/Mage, Berserker/Mage, and Kensai/Mage annoy the crap out of me. So, I simply don't use them.
I don't consider the new stuff Overhaul has added unbalanced, and I don't want it changed because some people do. The game will be fine, because IWD is already tactically challenging, while the kits on their own don't exactly bring anything earth-shattering to the table that the Mage and Ranger/Cleric and the abuse of certain spell interactions can't already surpass in overpoweredness. If it strikes you as overpowered, then don't use it.
You could already break the game by using a druid with certain resistance items. Additionally, extra attack items don't stack. There's a ring that gives an extra attack and it doesn't stack with the melee weapons that give the same effect.
Honestly, I'm worried about what the EE version does to druid shape-shifting and spells in general. For those not in the know, druids are incredibly strong in IWD. With items like the Bone-Marrow Belt and Leather of Resistance, and even more options if you went fighter/druid, there wasn't a lot you couldn't be immune to, even to the point where you healed from that damage, and as a result trivialized several hard fights. In addition, some of their spells were incredible, primarily a lot of their ground effects and summons.
But people are right to fear certain kits just breaking the game. Zerkers/barbs will likely be the only class you need as, for the most part, AC doesn't matter as much as resistances. The control immunities gained from these classes means they'll walk up and out-slug just about every enemy in the game point for point, especially with dual wielding. The only threatening enemies from a physical damage without the threat of CC are constructs, a small cadre of undead, and maybe some of the bosses, all of which can be beaten with stacked immunities.
Also, bows are ridiculously strong in IWD, more so than BG in my opinion. The amount of enemies vulnerable to unenchanted arrows is hilarious. The same list of Constructs, certain undead, and some bosses. Bosses that you wouldn't expect.
As a last quick note, spears have one redeeming factor in that they're the first +5 weapon you get in the game save for, potentially, a certain sword only usable by specific people. Not so significant in the main campaign, but a godsend in Trials of the Luremaster.
Comments
Also, which aspects, precisely, are going to "get shafted"?
I use Mikes RPG center for BG1 but it seems incomplete for IWD.
Overall, I'd say BG is more swingy in the beginning, but IWD is harder. You have to powergame more to make it. Still, I don't think the introduction of BG2 stuff and the cheese that goes along with it will really do IWD good.
No offense, but this is the most pathetic way to try to defend a poorly balanced game.
Something like that can be use when it comes to options, such as "hide helm", mods or cheats, but otherwise it is completely inexcusable.
Items will not be so bad. IWD have much larger groups of strong enemies than BG, so it is logical that we will need some sort of advantage. Probably we can allow most of the kits from BG2:EE (with narrowed eyes), but certainly not Dwarven Defender with his crazy tanking capabilities (he should not even be in BG).
Another problem will be magic.
BG2 have MUCH more strong spells then IWD and I'm talking mainly about the incredibly strong AOE spells.
Even if you limit scrolls, sorcerer will still be able to use them all.
IWD:EE will need much more than a simple transfer of content from BG.
Same goes with any ability you have a limited number of activations for.
But anyways, even limit per day, IWD will benefit from critical beta testing.
Dual-Class, and Muti-Class mages are strong only on high levels.
In IWD where you start on lvl 1, are these do-it-all-solo god characters rather a nuisance.
And, no, I don't accept those concepts. That's why I don't use them often. I hate quadratic wizard design. I tolerate it, because they have plenty of cool spells that don't break the game and having the wizard sprites in a party add variety. Fighter/Thief and Fighter/Cleric are good multi-class combos that I am comfortable with, but all this nonsense with things like Swashbuckler/Mage, Berserker/Mage, and Kensai/Mage annoy the crap out of me. So, I simply don't use them.
I don't consider the new stuff Overhaul has added unbalanced, and I don't want it changed because some people do. The game will be fine, because IWD is already tactically challenging, while the kits on their own don't exactly bring anything earth-shattering to the table that the Mage and Ranger/Cleric and the abuse of certain spell interactions can't already surpass in overpoweredness. If it strikes you as overpowered, then don't use it.
Honestly, I'm worried about what the EE version does to druid shape-shifting and spells in general. For those not in the know, druids are incredibly strong in IWD. With items like the Bone-Marrow Belt and Leather of Resistance, and even more options if you went fighter/druid, there wasn't a lot you couldn't be immune to, even to the point where you healed from that damage, and as a result trivialized several hard fights. In addition, some of their spells were incredible, primarily a lot of their ground effects and summons.
But people are right to fear certain kits just breaking the game. Zerkers/barbs will likely be the only class you need as, for the most part, AC doesn't matter as much as resistances. The control immunities gained from these classes means they'll walk up and out-slug just about every enemy in the game point for point, especially with dual wielding. The only threatening enemies from a physical damage without the threat of CC are constructs, a small cadre of undead, and maybe some of the bosses, all of which can be beaten with stacked immunities.
Also, bows are ridiculously strong in IWD, more so than BG in my opinion. The amount of enemies vulnerable to unenchanted arrows is hilarious. The same list of Constructs, certain undead, and some bosses. Bosses that you wouldn't expect.
As a last quick note, spears have one redeeming factor in that they're the first +5 weapon you get in the game save for, potentially, a certain sword only usable by specific people. Not so significant in the main campaign, but a godsend in Trials of the Luremaster.