Most important role in a BG party
Senash
Member Posts: 405
What is the most important class role you need to have in every party or even in solo runs?
Sure, you can do the game without finding traps, and just healing the damage after them, use a buffed up cleric to tank the horde of gibberlings or just rest until healed after every fight, but you gotta agree that most roles are quite important.
Keep in mind, that I'm not asking for your favourite here. I would instead like to know what's the most necessary role to have in a party? The one that you wouldn't omit from any party setups.
In the poll I'm just listing the basics. And I don't distinguish between different warrior roles (tank/melee damage dealer/ranged) as most warrior classes can do all these (kensai is not the best tank and cavalliers can only use some special throwing weapons, but they are rare exceptions).
As for mulit/dual classes, well, figure out which part of that multi-classed character is the one you prefer to have. Which role do you think you use them most, which role would you be willing to give up?
And I'm omitting support role (well this mainly goes for bards...) for obvious reasons (support needs something to support, without that, it's kind of moot...). Bards are either caster-types or warrior-types (Blade) here.
Sure, you can do the game without finding traps, and just healing the damage after them, use a buffed up cleric to tank the horde of gibberlings or just rest until healed after every fight, but you gotta agree that most roles are quite important.
Keep in mind, that I'm not asking for your favourite here. I would instead like to know what's the most necessary role to have in a party? The one that you wouldn't omit from any party setups.
In the poll I'm just listing the basics. And I don't distinguish between different warrior roles (tank/melee damage dealer/ranged) as most warrior classes can do all these (kensai is not the best tank and cavalliers can only use some special throwing weapons, but they are rare exceptions).
As for mulit/dual classes, well, figure out which part of that multi-classed character is the one you prefer to have. Which role do you think you use them most, which role would you be willing to give up?
And I'm omitting support role (well this mainly goes for bards...) for obvious reasons (support needs something to support, without that, it's kind of moot...). Bards are either caster-types or warrior-types (Blade) here.
- Most important role in a BG party115 votes
- Warrior (Squishy weaklings all of them...)14.78%
- Thief (Hah!They wouldn't last a single dungeon run without me!)31.30%
- Arcane Caster (There is no such problem a nicely aimed skull trap couldn't solve...)28.70%
- Divine Caster (Hm, how should I make my point? HEALZ!!!)  6.96%
- Don't know. Don't care. I support equality. Just show me the results!18.26%
Post edited by Senash on
1
Comments
And just think about it: which party member do you spend the most time with micromanaging?
In short a good party is a party with variety.
However… a party without a Thief is a pain in the a** (I remember one particular occasion when I dualed Imoen to a mage right after getting Coran and right before entering the Cloackwood Mines. Big mistake! Coran's finding traps/open locks sucked!). While they might not be essential, they make the experience more enjoyable.
People have soloed the game using every possible class or class combo - but I don't think the game is really meant to be played that way. Soloing actually can be seen as a form of "cheating", since you will be much higher level than intended, and will be hogging every material resource in the game, as well as employing extensive metagame knowledge. Not to say that there's anything wrong with that, but rather that it is a different game than was originally designed, and is more an exercise in memory and problem solving than in teamwork, strategy, and group tactics.
But more recent versions of the game have been "Balanced" such that it can be more approachable from a single player perspective, more's the pity in my opinion. My personal view is that it is intended to be a social game, not a competition. Play as a group.
On the flip side, if you are having fun, play as you like. No skin off my nose. I like the group dynamic. So I play with a 5-6 member party every time.
Point is to have fun ofc, as you said And I do belive that a system is better if it doesn't have so focused typical roles which are musts in a party.
That said, I think BG can be tackled without a cleric or mage, or a pure warrior-class character, and it can even turn out to be a fun, unusual experience. And that doesn't mean to have a less than 6 member party. Just a party with let's say a thief, a T/M, a fighter tank, a Blade, a Mage and an archer.
Soloing: Arcane caster; can get through a lot of binds with magic and lvling is faster without having those meatshield's taking 5/6 the xp.
I'm a bit of a mess when traveling, instead of disabling traps I pick the guy with the most hit point and make him run through them. Sometimes healing him, sometimes leaving him for dead (only in BG1 where there's plenty of NPCs to sacrifice).
So basically I never play without a Cleric in the party. Though I concede that Thieves are incredibly useful. Fighters and Mages aren't that important to me.
you can solo anyclass
but the easiest is arcane caster/multi-arcane
In contrast, in BG2 I'd say the arcane spellcaster. High level spells are just too awesome not to have!
BG2, I'd say Arcane Caster.
My comments were more about how the game has 'Evolved' (if you want to call it that) away from a social 'Group' dynamic into more of a model where individual competition is more easily embraced.
But I say again, play and have fun. Whatever your method of play is. If you are having fun and not at the expense of another player, it's all good.