The most ridiculous stats you have rolled for a Baldur's Gate character?
Samiel
Member Posts: 156
I remember my first full play through of Baldurs's Gate after three attempts I rolled some amazing stats for a Paladin. Which is easier to do on a Paladin because you always get the class requirement minimum ie you will have a min Charisma 17, but despite that I managed:
Strength: 18/00
Dexterity: 18
Constitution: 18
Intelligence: 11
Wisdom: 16
Charisma: 18
Which in turn meant that thanks to all the stat boosting tomes I imported into BGII looking like this:
Strength: 19
Dexterity: 19
Constitution: 19
Intelligence: 12
Wisdom: 18 (There were two wisdom boosting tomes if you know where to look!)
Charisma: 19
Question is what are the best stats you've managed to roll, and how long did it take you? I'd also be curious to know what are the crappiest stats anyone has managed to finish the game on?
Strength: 18/00
Dexterity: 18
Constitution: 18
Intelligence: 11
Wisdom: 16
Charisma: 18
Which in turn meant that thanks to all the stat boosting tomes I imported into BGII looking like this:
Strength: 19
Dexterity: 19
Constitution: 19
Intelligence: 12
Wisdom: 18 (There were two wisdom boosting tomes if you know where to look!)
Charisma: 19
Question is what are the best stats you've managed to roll, and how long did it take you? I'd also be curious to know what are the crappiest stats anyone has managed to finish the game on?
0
Comments
At some time I just resorted to rolling new stats and then setting all ability scores to its minimum score. This way you knew how many points you had to distribute. For my Fighter/Cleric/Mage had following stats once (without tomes):
18/xx
15
18
18
18
15
But that made the game feel rather dull for me as I always felt like having had cheated from the get go. Then I took some real dice and ended up with (without tomes):
12
11
13
14
10
7
18
17
18
18
17
One of them luck moments of my life Fainted after getting those rolls for me thief.
I wasn't even aware that it was possible to get anywhere near 106 points like @cyberarmy got?
@cyberarmy that does seem A LOT ! Screen, or it didn't happen
Probably this for my paladin. A bit stupid one maybe..
Expect a reply in 5 hours! :P
18/72
8
19
18
18
9
What makes this so exceptional? My character was a dwarf fighter/cleric with low minimums (9 str, 12 con, 9 wis), and after stat tomes, lum's machine, tears of bhaal, and equipment (Crom Faeyr, Ring of Human Influence, Nymph's Cloak, Gauntlets of Dexterity) he had the following stats:
25
18
21
20
23
20
I probably always end up with very slightly overpowered characters but I've always resisted the temptation to leave like that to get a broken char.
-EVIL IS DIE
...
-MInsc nods
@AceofWands It was a F/T mate, half elf, i think... that was 4-5 years ago
STR 18/58
DEX 18
CON 18
INT 11
WIS 10
CHA 13
Apart from the not perfect strength value (the roll was so good that I decided to go with it...after all, there's the +1 STR tome ), I find this build a bit over the top.
18/96
16
16
16
12
8
Eagle-eyed viewers will note that this allows me to get an innate 20 in strength, 18 in the other three stats that matter to me and a 16 in Wisdom for Limited Wish by the end of BG2, with a passable Charisma to boot. It might not be a powergamer's dream but I was pretty pleased with it, especially that 96 percentile (though I'm still not clear how the percentiles even work...)
But in the link below is an explanation for the way the strength table works.
http://www.ancientscrossroads.com/adnd_tools/str_table.htm
And the percents were, as I remember it, only available to warrior classes, and maybe paladins?
I think my stats were something like
18/38
18
18
7
18
18
I wonder if a D&D gamer would get to choose between
1) winning several millions in a lottery
2) rolling all 18s at character generation
what he/she would choose. ,)
Just how much more likely depends on what the engine does on rolls of 74 or less ,)
18/00
18
18
18
18
18
░░░░░▄▄▄▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄▄▄▄▄▄░░░░░░░
░░░░░█░░░░▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒░░▀▀▄░░░░
░░░░█░░░▒▒▒▒▒▒░░░░░░░░▒▒▒░░█░░░
░░░█░░░░░░▄██▀▄▄░░░░░▄▄▄░░░░█░░
░▄▀▒▄▄▄▒░█▀▀▀▀▄▄█░░░██▄▄█░░░░█░
█░▒█▒▄░▀▄▄▄▀░░░░░░░░█░░░▒▒▒▒▒░█
█░▒█░█▀▄▄░░░░░█▀░░░░▀▄░░▄▀▀▀▄▒█
░█░▀▄░█▄░█▀▄▄░▀░▀▀░▄▄▀░░░░█░░█░
░░█░░░▀▄▀█▄▄░█▀▀▀▄▄▄▄▀▀█▀██░█░░
░░░█░░░░██░░▀█▄▄▄█▄▄█▄████░█░░░
░░░░█░░░░▀▀▄░█░░░█░█▀██████░█░░
░░░░░▀▄░░░░░▀▀▄▄▄█▄█▄█▄█▄▀░░█░░
░░░░░░░▀▄▄░▒▒▒▒░░░░░░░░░░▒░░░█░
░░░░░░░░░░▀▀▄▄░▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒░░░░█░
░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▀▄▄▄▄▄░░░░░░░░█░░
U mad?
seriously though, i don't have patience to roll extremely good stats, so i just cheat with ctrl+8 and then lower some stats to get a (relatively) reasonable stat numbers...
i am just cursed with the need for every fighter or whatever that i make, has to be intelligent and wise. and charismatic. and dextrous. damn....
Not VERY ridiculous, but it's a 96 nonetheless. And this is of course the stat roll of my newly created character. It's with a paladin, the Strength score was just 18/19 though, which is a shame. But a 96 is a 96.
Bards have also good rolls overall, if a bit more limited than paladins. Then again I got a 98 with a bard once XD
edit- i won't cheat for bg:ee editions, i promised myself that.
18/00
18
18
10
10
15
Worst rolls had me ending up with four stats in single digits XD
please dont ask :P