Did anyone else here originally buy NWN solely because...
SharGuidesMyHand
Member Posts: 2,582
in Off-Topic
...BG2 kept telling you that you could import your character into it?
And was anyone else here as pissed as I was and felt like you had been scammed?
Just curious.
And was anyone else here as pissed as I was and felt like you had been scammed?
Just curious.
5
Comments
And no. Slightly dissappointed maybe.
Seems like an odd reason to buy a game.
I was disappointed when they announced before the release of NWN that you couldn't take your character from BG in due to the rule changes, but it didn't stop me from purchasing it.
I was pretty disappointed with NWN. I hoped it would have the same feel as Baldur's Gate but it just didn't. I think the big problem was that it was designed for multiplayer and I wanted to play solo. I found it really frustrating that I couldn't create a party and instead was limited to one henchman at a time. And the fact that I had virtually no control over my henchman drove me nuts. It seemed like whatever you asked them to do they would just run off an get themselves killed at the first opportunity.
Still, my biggest disappointment with NwN1 was that it felt more like walking through a toolset and not an actual game. The story of the main campaign was medicore at best and I quickly grew tired of being forced to play a "good" guy and search for a remedy of the plague.
And don't get me started on these horrible, horse-headed "Lizardfolk" models in shiny armor, which the game poorly described as the reptilian Creator Race known as Sarrukh. Bioware should at the very least gave them a serpentine lower body similar to those of Yuan-Ti Abominations. They were really lazy with every single monster model for that matter though with their retexturing-should-do-the-trick policy (using a retextured Hooked Horror model for the Vrock? Riiight...)
Hordes of the Underdark was indeed awesome aside from the railroading of the Evil path.
I recently bought the Diamond edition from gog.com, purely because HotU is supposed to be awesome. Playing thru the official campaign atm, and it's ooookaaaay. Not great but enjoyable enough.
Funny thing is, those "amateurs" gave me hundreds of hours of fun.. where the actual Dev's gave me a campaign so shit, that if not for the toolset the game would not even be worth the mass produced CD's it came on..
I did the same mistake with NWN2.. the main campaign is just so BAD, it's not even worth a review. Neeshka? God awful.. Elanee? Even more of a annoying old aunt than Jaheira could ever hope to be.
That sorceror b-word? Ugh.. and I've not even started on the horrible, painfull and utter disasterous voice acting.. good lord! Those two games even make those ridiculous title-stealing Baldur's Gate games for the consoles look good.
Neverwinter Nights are the kind of games I wish we could disinvent.. I hate them with a passion.
I tried to complete the OC last year just so that I would never have to again and even at my most determined I didn't make it. It's a shame because there's some things I like about it but they're just hidden very deeply by hordes of mindless filler combat and lazy, unsatisfying story progression (go get 4 things, got em? Ok go get another 4. Then again). SoU I actually completed and haven't played since but it had some memorable moments and better pacing. HotU I got pretty far on but epic level 3E burns me out.
NWN is good in its own ways, its not completely terrible, though if players had just finished the BG games and then went to NWN straight after or had the same expectation, then they'd be a bit disappointed. Same situation with the Dragon Age games, DA:O was great, though DA2 was..not so great (for me anyway because I wanted the same rich experience and compelling story)
Yeah, that's the one! Oh man, it was sooo epic! *goosebumps*