Sword of Balduran
wigglesg
Member Posts: 96
Random question (and one that's probably been answered a few times over) but why does it have different proficiency requirements in 1 vs. 2? I'd have thought when 1 was 2 ised they'd have at least kept the requirements uniformed.
Admittedly the specifications for the sword have also been changed (I suppose to make it actually worth buying in 2). Still the difference in requirements seems odd.
Admittedly the specifications for the sword have also been changed (I suppose to make it actually worth buying in 2). Still the difference in requirements seems odd.
0
Comments
I'm not entirely sure what it is you're asking but that's my best stab at it.
To which there really isn't a satisfying answer, but I guess one can assume it is a different sword. Even assuming they did indeed both belong to Balduran, it's not like a great hero couldn't have owned more than one weapon.
@scriver that is what I was asking, thanks! So I suppose it's best to RP the answer and say they are different swords but Balduran wasn't the sentimental type to name his sword?
Albruin is a very good sword by BG1 standards, but what I'd have preferred to see the EE add would have been a blunt weapon which works against Karoug, rather than yet another bastard sword. It'd make sense to me if they'd added the "cold iron" flag to Aule's Staff, for example. That would have increased the range of tactical options open to a player for this fight, which I'd have regarded as a genuine enhancement.
But heck, we've really drifted the topic now!