Skip to content

I have no idea what is going on... Please join me in happy befuddlement.

24

Comments

  • TStaelTStael Member Posts: 861
    My enjoyment of the SoD has not been diminished, and I am at a loss to believe that anyone normal gamers gaming joy is that fragile.

    Or maybe I can take so well, because 18 years on, i am still outraged that the original BG tried to force feed me this political agenda that slavery is wrong!!!! Oh, the boldness, oh the outrage - I just really wanted to drown all those slaves without any political rep-hit message that it's a bad thing to do...

    Where is my innocent escapism, I ask? (a smiley raising a slightly sardonic eyebrow here)
  • joluvjoluv Member Posts: 2,137
    edited April 2016
    I know you're kidding, @TStael, but that view is much closer than I would prefer to some that have been put forth in earnest. For example, from the OP of the Kotaku interview thread:
    Stradlin said:

    Is it bad thing by default if stuff like rampart sexism, slavery etc are portrayed as functional, integral, ordinary part of a fictional world, rather than as some devil-horned evil that is for player char to change?

    Edit: To be clear, I meant that those views should be farther from your joke, not that there was anything wrong with your joke.
  • TStaelTStael Member Posts: 861
    joluv said:

    I know you're kidding, @TStael, but that view is much closer than I would prefer to some that have been put forth in earnest. For example, from the OP of the Kotaku interview thread:

    Stradlin said:

    Is it bad thing by default if stuff like rampart sexism, slavery etc are portrayed as functional, integral, ordinary part of a fictional world, rather than as some devil-horned evil that is for player char to change?

    Edit: To be clear, I meant that those views should be farther from your joke, not that there was anything wrong with your joke.
    Indeed I was, and not to worry - I never assumed you humourless!

    I've indeed wondered why those who can take a dragon without batting an eyelash so closely cherish worst aspects of human society as some form of "sophisticated" or "natural" or "realistic" narrative. But try and introduce some of the better, more inclusive aspects, and it's terribly immersion breaking!

    Bit of double-standard here, maybe?

    I am not against "problematic" content, only that it should serve a narrative purpose. Take Leliana torture scene in DA:Inquisition. Do I like gratuitous, voyeuristic torture in games? No. Was that scene lacking in narrative meaning and power? Not at all!
  • TheWhitefireTheWhitefire Member Posts: 119
    I agree. Why, I just don't understand what people have against cabbage farming so much. I mean sure, we're mostly used to seeing grain, or even pumpkin farming in video games. So what makes graphic depictions of cabbage farming so bad?

    I mean, people eat cabbages. They are full of vital nutrients, yet people hate them so much for some reason. We should just end this cabbage hate, and the only way we can do that is through exposure to carciferous vegetables in the media.
  • ValamirCleaverValamirCleaver Member Posts: 184
    dunbar said:

    I always thought a tranny was a transistor radio.

    Stupid me, I thought the "tranny" was the gearbox and/or the drivetrain of my automobile.
    Anduin said:

    I think this is a British thing. A bit like a good shag means great hair for Americans on the other side of the pond and something else entirely for Brits...

    And here I thought that "good shag" meant high quality, deep pile carpeting.
  • joluvjoluv Member Posts: 2,137

    I mean, people eat cabbages. They are full of vital nutrients, yet people hate them so much for some reason.

    I don't want to be crude, but that reason is farts.
  • JoeyJoey Member Posts: 201
    Anduin said:

    Actually, we are using the Roman alphabet. The phonetic alphabet is much more bizarre.

    Wrong and correct. The phoenicians invented and wrote in lower case. THE ROMANS WROTE IN CAPITALS. Today, pupils still look on at the writing left on the ruins of the Roman empire all over Europe and wonder why they were always shouting...
    Roman architecture might have had capitals because they look much more appropriate on monuments and public buildings. Actual writing was done in lower case.
  • AnduinAnduin Member Posts: 5,745
    Joey said:

    Anduin said:

    Actually, we are using the Roman alphabet. The phonetic alphabet is much more bizarre.

    Wrong and correct. The phoenicians invented and wrote in lower case. THE ROMANS WROTE IN CAPITALS. Today, pupils still look on at the writing left on the ruins of the Roman empire all over Europe and wonder why they were always shouting...
    Roman architecture might have had capitals because they look much more appropriate on monuments and public buildings. Actual writing was done in lower case.
    Nope. They used capital letters on monuments as they purposefully have less curves so are easier to gouge and carve into stone... Also easier to gouge into clay. Paper is Egyptian... Papyrus.

    Although the Romans would scratch onto velum, stretched and dried sheepskin...

    More info here:
    http://moorstation.org/typoasis/tbp/topic/romworx/eng/roman.htm

    And more info on the birth of lower and upper case here:
    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Letter_case

    The Romans did use what we would recognise as lower case letters, but this was a stylistic use only... And what I have read... Only for four letters...

    Which is news to me as I teach this stuff!
  • JoeyJoey Member Posts: 201
    Anduin said:

    Joey said:

    Anduin said:

    Actually, we are using the Roman alphabet. The phonetic alphabet is much more bizarre.

    Wrong and correct. The phoenicians invented and wrote in lower case. THE ROMANS WROTE IN CAPITALS. Today, pupils still look on at the writing left on the ruins of the Roman empire all over Europe and wonder why they were always shouting...
    Roman architecture might have had capitals because they look much more appropriate on monuments and public buildings. Actual writing was done in lower case.
    Nope. They used capital letters on monuments as they purposefully have less curves so are easier to gouge and carve into stone... Also easier to gouge into clay. Paper is Egyptian... Papyrus.

    Although the Romans would scratch onto velum, stretched and dried sheepskin...

    More info here:
    http://moorstation.org/typoasis/tbp/topic/romworx/eng/roman.htm

    And more info on the birth of lower and upper case here:
    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Letter_case

    The Romans did use what we would recognise as lower case letters, but this was a stylistic use only... And what I have read... Only for four letters...

    Which is news to me as I teach this stuff!
    Written Roman alphabet - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_cursive. The capital letters were mainly used for buildings and public announcements, every day Latin was written in lower case, though obviously they didn't capitalise as we do.
  • marcerormarceror Member Posts: 577
    Anduin said:

    I honestly do not have a clue.

    I thought a transgender was a car part that had something to do with the clutch.

    I reckoned SJW was a type of bike chain lubricant.

    I was positive shoehorning is what you did when you used a shoehorn to put on a shoe...

    I was pretty sure computer games are used as a form of escapism and not a means to spread political ideologies.

    My apologies on being ignorant.

    Can we be happy now again please and just enjoy the befuddlement at the situation together?

    Happy? Happy?!? How can anyone be happy at a time like this?! What we need is more outrage, political posturing, and divisiveness! Call for boycotts! Ban... something! Get a bunch of people together with pitchforks! I don't know. Just do something that seems over the top and dramatic. That'll teach 'em!

    Doesn't that sound way better than being happy? :p
  • uglyaardvarkuglyaardvark Member Posts: 22
    All this SJW transgender whatever is not an issue for me, the issue is this is a bad game, they werent finished, way too many bugs, who cares what npcs say or dont say if you cant even go into a door?
  • TheWhitefireTheWhitefire Member Posts: 119
    @uglyaardvark "they werent finished, way too many bugs, who cares what npcs say or dont say if you cant even go into a door?"

    Honestly, I had the game give me 2 bugs, only one of which crashed the game (in total, over my entire playthrough of the expansion, my game crashed twice, both times after several hours of play). The less serious bug was just some issues with voicing (dorn declared himself party leader because he was tired. I chalked it up to him being SO TIRED he was hallucinating that I'd actually put him in charge of the part... HAH! As if!)

    @marceror "Call for boycotts!"

    Done. I say we boycott carbonated water! WHO NEEDS CARBONATED WATER!? Carbonated water is just trying to control us and make us buy into Big Business! Carbonated water is leading to kids being violent because they don't get enough sugar and food colouring when the drink it!
  • marcerormarceror Member Posts: 577



    @marceror "Call for boycotts!"

    Done. I say we boycott carbonated water! WHO NEEDS CARBONATED WATER!? Carbonated water is just trying to control us and make us buy into Big Business! Carbonated water is leading to kids being violent because they don't get enough sugar and food colouring when the drink it!

    That's the spirit! Now we're getting somewhere! Personally, I'm boycotting brussel sprouts. It's an evil vegetable that has ties to the radical SJW movement. Or was it ties to Gamers Gate? Bah. It makes little difference. I'm boycotting it, and there's nothing anyone can do to stop me.
  • The user and all related content has been deleted.
  • d00der82d00der82 Member Posts: 21
    Purudaya said:

    mf2112 said:

    Purudaya said:

    Anduin said:

    Purudaya said:

    Some people are basically trying to burn down a restaurant because it served them a burger they didn't like. Befuddling is right.

    Yes. But if they had been given burger they did not like and they were also an arsonist, this would make sense!

    The current situation is far more confusing...
    The burger had a little kale on it and was therefore trying to force a health food agenda down their throats. :wink:
    My kale was in a little side dish?
    Right, but you were still forced to *accept* that it was in the side dish. You weren't allowed to throw the kale in the server's face, for example. Also, the kale wasn't buried under enough cheese – you didn't have to dig before discovering that it was kale.
    Buy if the restaurant is otherwise enjoyable, then you would have to be a child or have some kind of emotional disorder to never return to said restaurant. In fact anyone who would refuse to go back to the restaurant over the kale side dish should be shunned by friends and society alike. *Sigh* unfortunately the world is full of awful people who will still accept these folks who would quickly discard wonderful restaurants based on a side of kale. The world wad a better place when these people were austricized.
  • abentwookieabentwookie Member Posts: 91
    edited April 2016
    Anduin said:

    I honestly do not have a clue.

    I thought a transgender was a car part that had something to do with the clutch.

    I reckoned SJW was a type of bike chain lubricant.

    I was positive shoehorning is what you did when you used a shoehorn to put on a shoe...

    I was pretty sure computer games are used as a form of escapism and not a means to spread political ideologies.

    My apologies on being ignorant.

    Can we be happy now again please and just enjoy the befuddlement at the situation together?

    The main problem is that people are claiming there is a political message simply because the developers chose to include a transgendered character. As if being transgendered itself is a political statement. lol They never told people they have to support transgendered people so there was no political message.

    The issue I see with "GamerGate" types of people is that they seem to think it has to be a political statement anytime a game has an LGBT character/relationship, strong female or black character as a protagonist, etc... When in reality, it is just most likely an attempt to appeal to a broader audience. These guys seem to not realize that this isn't the 1990's and the gaming audience is far more diverse now so companies are naturally going to try to increase their sales by appealing to more people. Its a smart business decision.

    The funny thing is that these guys never seem to apply the same logic whenever its a heterosexual white male character. Apparently, they never think that is a political statement but all other groups are.... Interesting logic. :o
  • joluvjoluv Member Posts: 2,137
    @Diogenes42:

    It's about ethics in cabbage journalism.
    cato.png 263.2K
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 0
    edited April 2016
    The user and all related content has been deleted.
  • Diogenes42Diogenes42 Member Posts: 597
    It hardly needs to be said that I am borrowing the wisdom of De Agri Cultura friend, we all know and love this great work.
  • marcerormarceror Member Posts: 577
    edited April 2016
    Yeah, and let's not forget Irenicus' shoehorning you in BG2 to give up your divine soul. "My soul's gone. I need yours". Just another whiny SJW archmage. It gets old. It really does.
  • megamike15megamike15 Member Posts: 2,666
    not even throne bhall is safe from this. you just beat jon and who walks up to pick a fight with you an female elf named Illasera. the most "developed" villain to ever be seen in an rpg. the pandering i swear.




  • ValamirCleaverValamirCleaver Member Posts: 184

    If you boycott brussels sprouts, you'll have to boycott all cauliflower and broccoli, too! They're all the same species.

    You forgot collard greens, kale and cabbage.
  • joluvjoluv Member Posts: 2,137
    And kohlrabi!
Sign In or Register to comment.