Skip to content

Why no Lich in the mage kit? Or HLA...

Diomedes33Diomedes33 Member Posts: 144
In my RP days, if I played a mage, he would always be tempted to transform into a lich in search of more power. Don't see why it couldnt be done in this game being that liches are actually in the game.
Post edited by Diomedes33 on
«1

Comments

  • Lord_TansheronLord_Tansheron Member Posts: 4,211
    I think the main problem is balance. You need to offset the tremendous power of lichdom somehow, which isn't hard to do in PnP but creates all sorts of concerns in BG.
  • NuinNuin Member Posts: 451
    edited April 2016
    "Hold on, let me take a break from saving Imoen/dealing with the people hunting me/retrieving my soul/dealing with my birthright/my quest for power and godhood so I can hole up in some isolated tower and begin the long, arduous process of studying/figuring out how to become a lich. Then I have to start actually preparing for the transformation, which could take months/even years. I also have to deal with the possibility that the transformation is going to screw with my Bhaalspawn essence which might just end up with my soul getting destroyed in the process."

    Sounds peachy.

    Edit: GODhood.
  • TrudeauIsSantaTrudeauIsSanta Member Posts: 161
    How about having the option there just for fun?
  • Diomedes33Diomedes33 Member Posts: 144
    Nuin said:

    "Hold on, let me take a break from saving Imoen/dealing with the people hunting me/retrieving my soul/dealing with my birthright/my quest for power and goodhood so I can hole up in some isolated tower and begin the long, arduous process of studying/figuring out how to become a lich. Then I have to start actually preparing for the transformation, which could take months/even years. I also have to deal with the possibility that the transformation is going to screw with my Bhaalspawn essence and the whole ordeal might just end up destroying my soul in the process."

    Sounds peachy.

    OR! Being as a mage charname might have seen that being a bhaalspawn is not as advantageous as it sounds and would look for a way out of it. What if becoming a lich would kill the Bhaalspawn essence but allow him to keep all the power? hmmmmm That DOES sound peachy
  • Lord_TansheronLord_Tansheron Member Posts: 4,211

    How about having the option there just for fun?

    Nothing stopping you from grabbing EEKeeper and making yourself a lich. You can give yourself all the relevant stats and immunities, you can even change your avatar if you like.

    I did a short run with an all-undead party where CHARNAME was a lich, but it's obviously blatantly overpowered.
  • XavioriaXavioria Member Posts: 874
    I totally vote in having a Lich that is part of the twisted rune join you if you're an evil party, which means you could get a SECOND undead character into your party with the lovely vampiress that joins you in the second game. I think a Lich NPC would be an awesome idea
  • KorbuKorbu Member Posts: 61
    edited April 2016
    The closest thing to a playable Lich that i've seen in a D&D CRPG, was the "Pale Master" prestige class in NWN 2.
    Only game that i have ever seen that let's you play as a Lich, was the Might and Magic series. M&M 7/8/9 let you become a Lich as your class promotion. Sadly, Ubisoft got ahold of the M&M franchise and didn't have playable Liches in M&M X.
    There are plenty of games out there that let you play as a Vampire, plenty that let you play as a Werewolf, yet almost none that let you play as a Lich. Not even TES series has allowed you to become a Lich yet (although there are some awesome mods for that).
    Post edited by Korbu on
  • ithildurnewithildurnew Member Posts: 273
    edited April 2016
    Lich is not a kit, nor is it a HLA or some fancy scroll to buy at the local adventurer's mart for 5000gp.

    Stupid idea is stupid. Just give yourself kilswd01.itm with EEKeeper (change it's weapon type if you're desperate enough), have fun.
  • lunarlunar Member Posts: 3,460
    There was a mod like this, waaay back in bg2. Canonicaly, a special poison potion should be prepared by the archmage. The poison has a chance to permanently kill the mage. In effect, it first slays the mage and then raises him as undead lich.

    In the mod it turned your character into a proper lich, changed your alignment to evil, with undead immunities to energy drain, death effects, stun, confusion, fatigue, cold damage etc. But it also gave you vulnerabilities to anti-undead spesific weapons and spells. I don't remember the name of the mod, or how it implemented lich spell immunities among other things. But it is doable.
  • DragonKingDragonKing Member Posts: 1,977
    I never understood the whole "You have to die" argument. IS there something I'm missing, because to my understanding that to become a lich ll that is really required is placing ones soul inside a phylactery, which I don't view as possible if the process kills you. Such a process with require a certain level of control at all times our you could lose your soul all together.

    Either way, if you can be a half god, half elf/orc, and half wtf ever; that makes as little sense as being a bhaal spawn that became a lich/
  • Diomedes33Diomedes33 Member Posts: 144
    @BillyYank So when Irenicus steals your soul in Chapter 3 or 4, Its looking pretty bleak for Charname. Now would be a good time to become an immortal monster...
  • Diomedes33Diomedes33 Member Posts: 144
    Pteran said:

    The problem is, a lich has to store their soul in a phylactery. Irenicus just ripped yours right out of you. You've got nothing to store.

    But did he? I mean its not clear what he steals. Its more like he steals the Bhaalspawn essence rather than his soul.
  • NuinNuin Member Posts: 451
    No, he steals your soul. It just happens that your soul is intrinsically linked with the Bhaalspawn essence because you ARE a Bhaalspawn. That's why you (and Imoen, if you have the mods) gain the ability to become the Slayer - the Bhaalspawn essence (because Irenicus didn't care enough to take all of it) is slowly corrupting your mortal form. It's also the reason why you suddenly find yourself in hell when you defeat Irenicus - because by killing him, you caused your soul to be dragged along to hell with him.
  • brusbrus Member Posts: 944
    Lich is a really powerful mage. You can build your char that way. It would be interesting to follow the quest of lichdom, a story driven adventures to become one.
    1. searching for tremendous magical power
    2. eternal life
    3. rituals to forge his phylactery amulet
    4. learning spells to return from death to life
  • DragonKingDragonKing Member Posts: 1,977
    @BillyYank
    Because being a god is overrated?

    Why just be the Lord of murder when I can be the murder god of the undead?
  • ArchaosArchaos Member Posts: 1,421
    Yes, to a Pale Master kit for either Sorcerers or Mages (maybe both), not to a true lich.

    But I could see a Dread Necromancer base class being adjusted and implemented that deals only with necromancy spells and turns you into a Lich at level 20.

    http://alcyius.com/dndtools/classes/dread-necromancer/index.html
  • AewyrvenAewyrven Member Posts: 228
    Pale master nwn. .. closest thing.

    I can sort of agree with the arguments against being a lich since you're the reincarnation of the god of murder and have the option to ascend out of it.... thing is, I also agree with lichdom beforehand for more awesomeness and to help combat other bhaalspawn in ToB...

    Only drawback is that while yes it takes us mere mortals a long time to get out of chapter freaking 1 if you do everything let alone complete the game.... you're on a rampage to find Imoen and kick irenicus' face in, so you don't really spend enough time rp wise to become one, let alone research it.

    Remember you've went from being a beard-less boy (or non-dwarf female) and killing sarevok to a jaunt down the sword coast to being snafud by irenicus in the space of what? A few months to a year?

    Factor that and you're in your what? Mid 20s? You aren't even on par with half of what Gorion knew if you go knowledge base let alone becoming a lich.

    You're just stronger due to being an avatar of a god.

    So in the interest of rp and sticking to the story line... I'd say no. Don't add to the core game.
  • lunarlunar Member Posts: 3,460
    I agree it makes little sense for pc to become a lich. Because he has to die, first. And canonically, when a bhaalspawn dies his essence is freed and goes to the throne. Thus, even if the pc becomes a lich, he will lose bhaal essence and will not be special for game purposes anymore. Think of Sarevok, he died, lost his essence and came back with the aid of some soul-stitching. The process is akin to turning lich, but reverse, in lichdom you are filled with negative energy that turns you undead, S filled himself with positive energy from charname's soul and became living...but no longer a legit bhaalspawn.
  •  TheArtisan TheArtisan Member Posts: 3,277
    There is a Pale Master mod here in the forums. It's a sorcerer kit though.
  • DragonKingDragonKing Member Posts: 1,977
    edited April 2016
    @lunar
    "Turning" undead and "dying and rising again as undead" aren't synonymous, as I already stated. I don't understand where the "dying" part comes into play if you're just placing your soul in a phylactery and filling your empty shell with negative energy. You didn't die, you transformed I to the undead. So where does this "you have to die first" come into place?

    The end result is undead yea, but aren't you using magic to change yourself on a biological level to get there? Some people become liches to escape death, so one would assume that the process or one of the processes to lichdom in fact bypasses death to become undead.
  • Lord_TansheronLord_Tansheron Member Posts: 4,211
    I suppose it's a matter of definition of what "death" means.

    Take, say, a zombie. It's a reanimated corpse, so they died - but now they're undead. They didn't go from living to undead, they went living->dead->undead. You could even argue that "undead" be interpreted as "no longer dead, but not alive again", in which case it would fit nicely with the whole Lich theme.

    I am not well-versed in D&D lore, but I do seem to recall that the process involves creating a powerful potion, which takes years to research and get the ingredients for etc. That potion when drunk will actually kill the imbiber, however if they did everything correctly they will then RISE AGAIN as a lich some time later. How and when the whole phylactery thing comes into play I'm uncertain. I'm sure there's volumes of material that explain it in detail.
  • AewyrvenAewyrven Member Posts: 228
    edited April 2016

    @lunar
    "Turning" undead and "dying and rising again as undead" aren't synonymous, as I already stated. I don't understand where the "dying" part comes into play if you're just placing your soul in a phylactery and filling your empty shell with negative energy. You didn't die, you transformed I to the undead. So where does this "you have to die first" come into place?

    The end result is undead yea, but aren't you using magic to change yourself on a biological level to get there? Some people become liches to escape death, so one would assume that the process or one of the processes to lichdom in fact bypasses death to become undead.

    Some would argue you don't have to die to Ecole a vampire either.

    A lich is an undead. To become **UN**-dead. You must first be dead.

    A lich however CHEATS death by placing it's soul in limbo so to speak. In this case a phylactery....

    If you want an easier way to... justify it.... read Anne rice and the vampire chronicles. (Vampire lestat, interview with the vampire.

    Your body dies. It's dead. Your conciousness remains. In terms case of her vampires, their essence, humanity, elfanity, dwarfity.... soul... is within the body.

    The body is dead. It's just powered by the engine or essence or soul that once inhabited it.

    It's why you have to burn them alive (fire or sun) so the soul has nowhere to go but on to the next phase of its journey.

    In the case of a lich it's in a jar/amulet/refractory/ect.

    You can get really creative and speculative if you want. Davy Jones from pirates of the carribean was a lich. So was Barbosa and his crew in dead man's chest.

    Voldemort from harry potter was a lich.... Dorian grey... I could go on...

    They were all walking talking corpses that quite simply had cheated death... or if you prefer... knew they were dead but simply required some stupid poorly scripted CHAR NAME to come along, hold up a mirror (flashy wand, rusty old knife, gold coin) and say nope. Ur dead, now give me ur lewts.

    So... do ya really wanna be a lich?

    Me... I'd rather be the prodigal child of the god of freaking murder and embrace that and become a god than some dam lich where any idiot can come along and gank me because I left my soul on a fence post somewhere.

    *grin*
  • DragonKingDragonKing Member Posts: 1,977
    @Aewyrven
    To rebuttal or not to rebuttal? I've been gone a while so let's do it!

    -laughs-

    I can agree with you to a degree, what I don't agree with the most is the vampire lich comparison. Because even if we throw out the type of vampire brim stokes brought into the spot light with his story Dracula and look at actually mythological type of creatures that closely resemble vampires as we know them today. The Jiangshi for example, the are by definition reanimated corpse, meaning the original consciousness has left the body, that person has died. Most depictions of becoming a vampire follow along the lines of most depictions of becoming a traditional zombie, the infected dies before their transformation is fully completed, and not every time is it the conscious of the original being that remains in control

    This is where different series have their own interpretation of what a vampire is, what defines a vampire, does the vampire retain its human conscious, does it gain a bestial conscious; and should they be allowed to sparkle in the in the sunlight? But one this that remains the same is the most basic ideas of a vampire which is the will or necessity to drink blood or plasma.


    A lich other hand, @Lord_Tansheron actually has the right idea. You first need to define what "death" is and the processes of achieving it or escaping it. My original question stayed close to the bare basics of what makes a lich, placing ones soul in a phylactery, and this will make one undead. Yet there maybe series out there that use phylacteries in a similar manner but doesn't male the character undead, just unable to die through normal means.

    Yea ye, I know, I just straw manned that last bit hard. So lets just look at DND lore for a minute. If in its lore, if dying is actually a requirement, then that's all that is really needed to be said, but if the lore only speaks of placing one's soul into a phylactery. Then there is no evidence that they actually die, and dying is being attached to it because of the preconceived notion that before there can be undeath, or unlife there first must be death. Its understandable notion, one that I wouldn't even argue against if its lore written. But, if that notion isn't lore written then I see no reason that going from living to lich, does not and can bypass death or dying.

    I mean death is no longer just ones body no longer functioning properly, but a very important part of death is the loss of consciousness or the consciousness nolonger being attached to the body or at least the evidence that the consciousness is no longer there.

    With that said, being the god of murder is just as boring as being a lich.

    HASHTAG DRAGONLYFE
Sign In or Register to comment.