Which one is better, Sword of Flame or Blade of Roses?
Idied5minutesago
Member Posts: 16
I am having a fight with myself on which one of them I'm gonna sell, I like both of them but you can't keep the other one forever, right?
0
Comments
De'arnise keep has way more fire arrows than you could ever need to kill all trolls. You don't have to bring anything to the keep to be able to finish the quest, it's already all there.
Personally I would never waste gold on +1 sword, the Rose, on the other hand, is a very cheap and early aquirable +3 weapon I quite often buy even when noone is specializing in longswords. Gold really only matters in the beginning and using the little you have for starters on a sword with very limited use rather than saving up for something better or buying a scroll of whatever is IMHO, not advisable.
But please, let's stay on topic!
1. Varscona +2 that you get from the first golem room in the chapter 1 dungeon (post 2.0) if you put pips in longsword at creation.
2. Namarra +2 with +4 damage (2 bonus damage for a +2 sword) and silence 3 times/day from a crypt in the graveyard guarded by a special skeleton warrior (with scs you might want to cast prot fear before fighting him). Awesome weapon for backstabs early on.
3. Flame tongue +1 (+4 vs undead) and flaming sword animation! From the first quest in Trademeet, loot from one of the druids just before the boss.
However, my need to be a badass adventurer tells me that the flame sword is better, especially when both flaming swords (one in Ribald's, one at Copper Coronet) are bought with skills in dual wielding. I personally believe this is the only acceptable time to dual wield, though that is a personal gaming decision on my part.