Skip to content

Would a Shaman with the ability to cast Cleric spells be cheesy/broken?

RelSundanRelSundan Member Posts: 918
edited October 2016 in General Discussion (Spoiler Warning!)
It kinda just flew into me right now, the thought being inspired by the Cleric/Ranger's ability to cast both druid and cleric spells (Until it was patched, it can still be done through some editing). If there was a way to allow the Shaman to get access to both druid spells and cleric spells, would the character be broken, cheesy or would it be a fair advantage taking into account how some of the Shamans utilities is kind of useless. (Shaman dancing, not useless but it is kind of underpowered imo)
  1. Would a Shaman with the ability to cast Cleric spells be cheesy/broken?21 votes
    1. Yes, the shaman would be broken/unbalanced. No more clerics for me!
      14.29%
    2. No, giving him Cleric spells would be fair and even
      42.86%
    3. It would be cool, but it would break RP.
      42.86%

Comments

  • TressetTresset Member, Moderator Posts: 8,264
    More broken than a sorcerer? I highly doubt it...
  • Grond0Grond0 Member Posts: 7,320
    The shaman gets some additional spells anyway and the spells they have are very powerful. I don't think therefore they need clerical spells from the point of view of power gaming. However, given there are some pretty useless druid spells (and there are far fewer of those than arcane to start with) there is not a lot of real choice in choosing 5 spells for a shaman. Allowing them to pick clerical spells as well would offer the sort of variety in character builds available to the sorcerer.
  • JumboWheat01JumboWheat01 Member Posts: 1,028
    A Shaman casting Cleric spells just comes off as wrong to me.

    Now re-jiggering it, calling it a Favoured Soul, and giving THAT the ability to cast Cleric spells like a Shaman does Druid or a Sorcerer does Arcane, that's perfectly cool with me.
  • Abi_DalzimAbi_Dalzim Member Posts: 1,428
    The big advantage divine spells have over arcane IMO is the bonus spells a cleric gets for wisdom. Without that advantage, this Favored Soul-esque retread would still be a lot weaker than a sorcerer. Moreover, the cleric really kind of needs to have their full class list, since unlike wizards and especially sorcerers, their strength comes from the ability to drop down situational protections based on what suits the enemy they're currently fighting. Five spells per level is too many for druid spells, but not nearly enough for a cleric.
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 0
    edited October 2016
    The user and all related content has been deleted.
  • TressetTresset Member, Moderator Posts: 8,264
    JumboWheat01 said:

    A Shaman casting Cleric spells just comes off as wrong to me.

    Now re-jiggering it, calling it a Favoured Soul, and giving THAT the ability to cast Cleric spells like a Shaman does Druid or a Sorcerer does Arcane, that's perfectly cool with me.

    This. While I don't think it would be imbalanced (compared to other classes) for a shaman to also have cleric spells, I also voted with the thought that a new class would be a better option.
  • AasimAasim Member Posts: 591
    edited October 2016
    You should all try Spell Revisions. It makes Shaman into what it should be in the first place, and there will be no more useless spells.
  • GenderNihilismGirdleGenderNihilismGirdle Member Posts: 1,353
    subtledoctor said:

    This poll needs a 4th option.

    Giving a shaman access to ANY divine spells - cleric and druid spells - would indeed be broken. And kind of stupid, gorman RP standpoint. But, as long as only a subset of spells is available, it might be fine.

    Frankly what would make the most sense would be different themed shaman kits, each getting access to a different subset of spells. Coincidentally, this is exactly what our 'Faiths & Powers' mod is planning to do. :smiley: Hopefully it will be available by the end of the year.

    As for sorcerers, the same is true there. And that's what @Aquadrizzt's 'Tome & Blood' mod does, it makes various themed sorcerer kits, each of which has access to a particular subset of arcane spells.

    Yeah, this'd be my vote if the poll had this option tbqh
  • semiticgoddesssemiticgoddess Member Posts: 14,903
    The critical detail here is that even if the Shaman can learn cleric spells, it can still only learn a few spells of each level, since it learns spells like a sorcerer. Learning cleric spells would mean it can't learn as many druid spells.

    The Shaman is currently not strong enough for this buff to make it unbalanced.
  • RelSundanRelSundan Member Posts: 918
    Sorry, some of you smartheads thought of things I didn't think about. Give me a proper 4th option so I can add it.
  • ArchaosArchaos Member Posts: 1,421
    Abi_Dalzim said:

    Moreover, the cleric really kind of needs to have their full class list, since unlike wizards and especially sorcerers, their strength comes from the ability to drop down situational protections based on what suits the enemy they're currently fighting.

    Not exactly, the same could be said for the Sorcerer. Many situational Mage spells can't all fit into the Sorcerer's limited list.
    This is why it's a good idea to have a Mage as well (dual/multi/whatever) to cover what the Sorcerer doesn't.

    That way the Sorcerer focuses on the blasting/spamming spells and the Mage focuses on more situational spells.

    Same thing with a spontaneous Cleric/Favored Soul.
    The main way Favored Souls are used in NwN2 are as buff-and-melee and/or spamming healing spells and buffs on the party, as well as Raise Dead/Resurrections.

    While Favored Souls can't do everything, they are still pretty convenient to have as they can recast dispelled buffs on the spot as well as keep the party alive by spamming Heals/Restorations/Resurrections.

    Since neither BG nor NwN2 are PnP, you generally take a few must-have spells from a limited list and they're usually more or less good to go, without much trouble.
    They also get one more spell known, compared to Sorcerers (4 instead of 3 spells known, for example).
  • TressetTresset Member, Moderator Posts: 8,264
    RelSundan said:

    Sorry, some of you smartheads thought of things I didn't think about. Give me a proper 4th option so I can add it.

    Impossible; even moderators can't change options on an existing poll...
  • FlashburnFlashburn Member Posts: 1,847
    Druids just need a bigger spell list since Shamans draw from it. In NWN2 their repertoire is fairly strong, even more so with the PrC pack installed.
Sign In or Register to comment.

2024 Overhaul Games, a division of Beamdog. © 2024 Hasbro, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Baldur's Gate, Dungeons & Dragons, D&D, Forgotten Realms, Baldur's Gate, Wizards of the Coast and their logos are trademarks of Wizards of the Coast LLC in the U.S.A. and other countries, and are used with permission. Hasbro and its logo are trademarks of Hasbro, Inc. and are used with permission. © 1998 BioWare Corp. All Rights Reserved. BioWare, the BioWare Infinity Engine and the BioWare logo are trademarks of Bioware Corp. Black Isle Studios and the Black Isle Studios logo are trademarks of Interplay Entertainment Corp. Atari and the Atari logo are trademarks owned by Atari Interactive, Inc. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners.