"This would require a new section of character creation called "Religion" or "Worship", allowing any character - not just clerics - to choose a religious affiliation. The affiliation should have a description of the god's beliefs, possible alignments, favored weapons, and associated spells. If you're a priest, you get a free proficiency point in your god's favored weapon, and access to the god's associated spells. Give each god a "Priest Benefit", too, such as a 1/day special ability.
That way it becomes an interesting part of every character, not just priests; and the god-specific benefits become a part of the priest base class, not the kit. Then you might have a kit, such as cloistered cleric, that specifically *doesn't* grant the extra proficiency slot, but maybe grants an additional use of the god's special ability."
And the insightful is given by @noober (and that it's not a coincidence!) on June 26, 2012. The post itself is of May 31, 2012.
The insightful is given by @DukeOfSuffolk on July 20, 2012. The post itself is of June 23, 2012.
I wonder whether Dee (at that time @Aosaw) and elminster remember those conversations. What were there thinkings then? It's funny that the forum had @noober around. And it's quite telling that many participants of those discussions are still there, for e.g. @Dazzu himself
I remember that conversation. Its also quite possibly one of the first "disagrees" I ever got. No more of those going around hehe (at least not as something you can click)
I remember that conversation. Its also quite possibly one of the first "disagrees" I ever got. No more of those going around hehe (at least not as something you can click)
I know it sounds a bit twisted to say, but I miss disagree.
I remember that conversation. Its also quite possibly one of the first "disagrees" I ever got. No more of those going around hehe (at least not as something you can click)
I know it sounds a bit twisted to say, but I miss disagree.
@Dazzu People aren't afraid of different opinions, we do say what we think and if we don't agree we say it, the thing is I think that disagree reaction was abused that why it was removed.
I just don't understand why people might be afraid that there's a such thing as differing opinions... the horror!
I don't understand why people would be afraid of differing opinions either, but as kaguana pointed the feature itself just lead to abuse. Like what is discussed in the following.
Comments
@kaguana
Hmm you haz fun ahh ? so get one of this
http://forum.baldursgate.com/discussion/32969/on-the-nature-of-spambots
Dee: http://forum.baldursgate.com/discussion/comment/72/#Comment_72 on a question by @Dazzu about if there can be god powers on top of cleric, druid and mage kits (schools) in BG:EE:
"This would require a new section of character creation called "Religion" or "Worship", allowing any character - not just clerics - to choose a religious affiliation. The affiliation should have a description of the god's beliefs, possible alignments, favored weapons, and associated spells. If you're a priest, you get a free proficiency point in your god's favored weapon, and access to the god's associated spells. Give each god a "Priest Benefit", too, such as a 1/day special ability.
That way it becomes an interesting part of every character, not just priests; and the god-specific benefits become a part of the priest base class, not the kit. Then you might have a kit, such as cloistered cleric, that specifically *doesn't* grant the extra proficiency slot, but maybe grants an additional use of the god's special ability."
And the insightful is given by @noober (and that it's not a coincidence!) on June 26, 2012. The post itself is of May 31, 2012.
elminster: http://forum.baldursgate.com/discussion/comment/7405/#Comment_7405 on a feature request of not making items stackable to 99.
"I agree, leave it to mods."
The insightful is given by @DukeOfSuffolk on July 20, 2012. The post itself is of June 23, 2012.
I wonder whether Dee (at that time @Aosaw) and elminster remember those conversations. What were there thinkings then? It's funny that the forum had @noober around. And it's quite telling that many participants of those discussions are still there, for e.g. @Dazzu himself
http://forum.baldursgate.com/discussion/comment/17419/#Comment_17419
(keeping in mind that Tanthalas used to be a moderator)