Elves get +1 to hit with 2-handed swords
MatteoTurini
Member Posts: 105
I tried to search for this on the forum, but I couldn't find a thread about it. If it's already been reported or dealt with, sorry!
I've noticed this behaviour in vanilla BG1 when I started playing it 12 years or so ago. I don't know if any mod addresses it.
CURRENT BEHAVIOUR: elves receive a +1 bonus to hit when using 2 handed swords.
DESIRED BEHAVIOUR: elves should not receive the bonus; they should (as for pen and paper rules) only receive it when using long swords, short swords and bows.
I've noticed this behaviour in vanilla BG1 when I started playing it 12 years or so ago. I don't know if any mod addresses it.
CURRENT BEHAVIOUR: elves receive a +1 bonus to hit when using 2 handed swords.
DESIRED BEHAVIOUR: elves should not receive the bonus; they should (as for pen and paper rules) only receive it when using long swords, short swords and bows.
Post edited by Balquo on
2
Comments
I may understand kantanas and other 1-handed swords (though I'm not sure the bonus is used as intended, in this case), but I think 2-handed swords are not what the pnp designers had in mind.
"When employing a bow of any sort other than a crossbow, or when using a short or long sword, elves gain a bonus of +1 to their attack rolls".
That sounds like the +1 bonus for swords should only be applied to long swords and short swords, as identified per their proficiency. Scimitars/Katanas/etc. should not receive this bonus.
Elves don't get any penalties to their strength stat, there's no reason for them not to be able to use greatswords.
I've got to agree. A sword is a bladed weapon (edged weapon) used primarily for cutting or thrusting. So, every weapon consisting of the blade and the hilt, counts as a sword. The mechanic of battle with different types of swords is more or less simular. At least, compared with club weapons or axes. Thus, elves can have the bonus with 2-handed swords, katanas, scimitars etc.
The only thing a long sword, a katana, a scimitar and a kopesh for instance have in common is that they are swords. They require different techniques, have different handling, mass center, length and weight. Try to handle a long sword as you do a short and you're more likely to hurt yourself than your opponent. Learning a new weapon requires quite some time of practice.
So as I said earlier if we go by the rules, an elf gets the bonus only with long and short swords, there really is no way that the bonus would apply to other swords. This reflects the fact that those are cultural weapons for an elf and that by the time he is an adult, around 110 years old, he has some 40 years of practice with those weapons.
The vast human empire of Shou Lung is undoubtedly the most powerful nation on the face of Abeir-Toril. While this nation controls the largest military spelljammer fleet in Realmspace, those vessels are employed in a strictly defensive role, rooting out pirates and acting as a counter to the spelljammer fleets of Wa and the Elven Imperial Fleet.
Due to these reasons, many elves could understand how to attack and defend with katanas - they could take them from killed enemies, even start elven dojos. Why not?
And what reason could prevent Elves from using two-handed swords?
The example you provided would just mean that those elves would start with pips in Katana proficiency.
The THAC0 bonus all elves receive when using Long swords, short swords and bows is supposed to emulate the fact that all elves receive basic training with those weapons (though admittedly, this causes some other inconsistencies, because they probably should start with a free proficiency in all those weapons so they never have penalties when wielding them, IWD2 handled it better).
If the designers of D&D felt that Elves should get a bonus to all sword types, why did they not just say swords? The rules specifically say "long sword" and "short sword", not just "swords".
The way you fight with a scimitar and katanas are completely different than how you fight with a long sword or short sword. The similarities between scimitar/katanas and a long/short swords is that they are long pieces of sharp metal, that's it.
Long swords and short swords are native to Elves. They spent their history as a species using them, thus the bonus. The other two sword types do not apply.
Its possible, but I don't know when.
This is what -really- separates these two swords from other blades like Katanas and Scimitars, they are curved blades specifically made for slashing and are supreme compared to a longsword in this regard. The curved edge of it lets you apply a slash that'll keep cutting as you draw the blade and can lead to dismembering. A straight blade however, would sink as deep into the flesh as the initial impact would drive it and the slashing attack would then be stopped.
This is a logical answer as to why they gain bonus to Long- and Shortswords and not the others, beyond that of cultural history.
The fact that Longswords are limited to Slashing damage is really nothing short of stupid. They -can- slash, but were designed, used and excelled as a piercing weapon.