Skip to content

Baldur's Gate III released into Early Access

18283858788123

Comments

  • PsicoVicPsicoVic Member Posts: 868
    I´m inclined to agree, but I have to point out that a level one player character is far stronger than any peasant or average human.
    You can cast spells, recover health, use divine powers, hit the enemy where it hurts, and you are skilled in a lot of fields.
    Do not let the fact that you have room to growth fool you: you are exceptional from the start.

    an example: Abdel Adrian is a level 4 fighter/soldier in the DiA adventure, and he´s a bloody semigod.
    Lord Nasher Alagondar is a lvl 7 Knight.
    etc.
  • mlnevesemlnevese Member, Moderator Posts: 10,214
    On tabletop high level characters like Elminster are quite rare. In other settings, such as Dragonlance, a level 14 character would be legendary.
  • KamigoroshiKamigoroshi Member Posts: 5,870
    They're not quite as rare as one might think. You can hardly kick a rock in the Forgotten Realms without hitting someone powerful. Well, at least you won't find a lich in every cellar like in BG2. Probably...?
  • SorcererV1ct0rSorcererV1ct0r Member Posts: 2,176
    edited August 2020
    PsicoVic wrote: »
    I´m inclined to agree, but I have to point out that a level one player character is far stronger than any peasant or average human.(...)

    LV 0 commoners on Faerun that are ludicrous weak. A house cat could kill a lv 0 commoner easily. A low level ranger has zero chances of hunting a panther(CR = 4). Spells and divine powers are mundane things which exists in Faerun but not in our world. However, access to firearms exists in our world.

    IRL a hunter with a .45-70 rifle can easily hunt a Elephant(CR 7) and Neanderthals with spears could hunt Mammoths(CR = 10). And note that I an talking about IRL animals. Arguably, if a Balor exists and appears in our world, he would't be a match to a modern armored vehicle with 30mm autocannons.
    PsicoVic wrote: »
    an example: Abdel Adrian is a level 4 fighter/soldier in the DiA adventure, and he´s a bloody semigod.
    Lord Nasher Alagondar is a lvl 7 Knight.
    etc.

    I don't know about Abdel. However, Lord Nasher level is lv 12 on 2e and lv 7 fighter/4 divine champion on 3.5e ( https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Nasher_Alagondar )

    Sorry but I don't consider someone that can't kill a bear using a arbalest "semigod". The average commoner in IRL medieval times probably could kill this large animals with a heavy crossbow and a hunting spear.
    ThacoBell wrote: »
    " I wish that i could have a succubus familiar."

    This doesn't even make sense.
    How about being the familiar of a succubus? :smirk:

    Would be very harsh... But I can't detail why because I need to maintain PG13 here.

    But I an not saying that a succubus familiar for the lv 1 wizard.

    Look to NWN1 familiars. If a magician can "tame" and have a high level pseudo dragon familiar which can have epic(+5) natural weapons and able to cast 20d6 cone of fire 5 times per day, he probably can make a succubus his familiar. This would require a "epic familiar" feat or something similar but could be fun.
  • PsicoVicPsicoVic Member Posts: 868
    edited August 2020
    PsicoVic wrote: »
    an example: Abdel Adrian is a level 4 fighter/soldier in the DiA adventure, and he´s a bloody semigod.
    Lord Nasher Alagondar is a lvl 7 Knight.
    etc.

    Sorry but I don't consider someone that can't kill a bear using a arbalest "semigod". The average commoner in IRL medieval times probably could kill this large animals with a heavy crossbow and a hunting spear.

    Abdel Adrian is (sadly) the canon baalspawn, the hero of baldur´s gate and its a baalspawn, ergo a Semigod =D

    And he is a lvl 4 fighter/soldier in the Dia Adventure ( obviously I´m not going to post a part of a licensed book of an adventure of Wotc). Anyway, that´s simply an example.
  • SorcererV1ct0rSorcererV1ct0r Member Posts: 2,176
    edited August 2020
    PsicoVic wrote: »
    PsicoVic wrote: »
    an example: Abdel Adrian is a level 4 fighter/soldier in the DiA adventure, and he´s a bloody semigod.
    Lord Nasher Alagondar is a lvl 7 Knight.
    etc.

    Sorry but I don't consider someone that can't kill a bear using a arbalest "semigod". The average commoner in IRL medieval times probably could kill this large animals with a heavy crossbow and a hunting spear.

    Abdel Adrian is (sadly) the canon baalspawn, the hero of baldur´s gate and its a baalspawn, ergo a Semigod =D

    And he is a lvl 4 fighter/soldier in the Dia Adventure ( obviously I´m not going to post a part of a licensed book of an adventure of Wotc). Anyway, that´s simply an example.

    TSR treated the story in a much better way. No way that a lv 4 character can kill characters like Firkraag...

    The page 96 of Domains of Dread mentions that Strahd is a 16th level necromancer but before the fall of grave, he was a quoting the book "In life, he was merely a 5th level mage" and the book mentions that 5th mage is something of "mediocre skill" many times, the book itself downplay mages bellow lv 10 many times.


    The notion that everyone in Faerun is extremely low level, is something pushed by WoTC on late 3e edition, 4e and 5e.

    If you look into Netheril : Empire of Magic, on NPC's section, I will list the first 5 NPC's
    1. Nether(elder) -12th fighter - 8th priest
    2. Nether(younger) - 12th level ranger
    3. Terraseer - 35th level arcanist
    4. Congenio - 20th level arcanist
    5. Ioulaum - 41th level aracnist

    No one who holds the title of "archwizard" on Netheril is bellow lv 30. The notion that someone that can't even kill a Brown Bear is godlike is so ....

    EDIT : I found a archwizard bellow lv 30. On page 113.

    dTSr80e.png
  • AmmarAmmar Member Posts: 1,297
    If you need enchanted weapons to hit him the tank is toast against a balor :D
  • CahirCahir Member, Moderator, Translator (NDA) Posts: 2,819
    edited August 2020
    I don't know how it's like in 4e or 5e Faerun (I stopped following timeline after 3.5), but I have notice overall nerfing in 3rd edition when it comes to most of the more powerful mages. Still there are tons of mages over 20th level in 3ed Faerun and quite a few over 30th (Elminster, Simbul, Larloch, Khelben, Ioulaum, Telamont Tanthul, Szass Tam, couple of Twisted Rune liches, Aumvor the Undying, Qysar Shoon the Demilich - those are just the ones I remember from the top of my head).

    I must admit there was some appeal in the fact those character were so goddamn powerful, it makes them feel legendary.

    It was also the fun experience being able to kill such a powerful foes as Firkraag or Demogorgon. It was more satysfing than killing any enemy encountered in BG1. That *however* doesn't mean that battles in BG3 won't be any less excited for me.
    Post edited by Cahir on
  • SorcererV1ct0rSorcererV1ct0r Member Posts: 2,176
    Ammar wrote: »
    If you need enchanted weapons to hit him the tank is toast against a balor :D

    Wrong. He has DR 15/cold iron(3.5e), assuming that a heavy crossbow deals d10 damage, Imagine what a 30mm cannon can do. Probably 40 damage per shot on average, and there are 30mm cannons that can fire about 3,900 rounds per minute(GAU-8 Avenger), the cannon can dish so much damage per round that the DR 15 will be worthless.

    And if a lot of demon appears, people would figure out that cold iron is the best weapon against then and every military in the world would have "cold iron tip" ammo.

    Believe or not, people discussed IRL weapons vs D&D creatures and the general consensus is that a Me 262 or other jets would win against any ancient dragon if they are in a antimagic zone. If the dragons can cast spells like control weather, then the dragon wins.
  • CahirCahir Member, Moderator, Translator (NDA) Posts: 2,819
    ThacoBell wrote: »
    @SorcererV1ct0r "Sorry but I don't consider someone that can't kill a bear using a arbalest "semigod". The average commoner in IRL medieval times probably could kill this large animals with a heavy crossbow and a hunting spear."

    Dude, do you know what bears are capable of irl? I'm surprised anyone can kill a bear something like a spear or bow (maybe with 8 other guys). Modern bear guns (which are capable of dropping elephants) DON'T ALWAYS WORK. Its insane and bears are terrifying. If anything D&D nerfs bears into oblivion. A brown bear should start at dire bear stats and they should get stronger from there. Fun Fact: The oldest known word for "bear" isn't the actual word for bear from that language. It was never spoken out of fear of summoning one. The word that survives translates roughly as "ruin" or "destruction".

    Yup, just recalled my battle with Legendary Bear from RDR2. Brrr, terryfing experience. I was not able to shot the crazy bastard from the distance and when he reached me, poor Arthur Morgan was literally torn to piece. So yeah, bears are not the creature you want to mess with ?
  • SorcererV1ct0rSorcererV1ct0r Member Posts: 2,176
    edited August 2020
    ThacoBell wrote: »
    Dude, do you know what bears are capable of irl? I'm surprised anyone can kill a bear something like a spear or bow (maybe with 8 other guys). Modern bear guns (which are capable of dropping elephants) DON'T ALWAYS WORK. Its insane and bears are terrifying. If anything D&D nerfs bears into oblivion. A brown bear should start at dire bear stats and they should get stronger from there. Fun Fact: The oldest known word for "bear" isn't the actual word for bear from that language. It was never spoken out of fear of summoning one. The word that survives translates roughly as "ruin" or "destruction".

    There are a LOT of videos of people hunting Bears with spears/bows. People tend to downplay bows and spears too much. A british warbow firing a broad head arrow probably can kill this wild animals.

    A video of a Javelin thrower killing a bear with a spear throw.

    EDIT : You are also downplaying "hunting rifles", a .45-70 rifle a 458 Winchest Magnum is so powerful.
    Post edited by SorcererV1ct0r on
  • kanisathakanisatha Member Posts: 1,308
    Cahir wrote: »
    I don't know how it's like in 4e or 5e Faerun (I stopped following timeline after 3.5), but I have notice overall nerfing in 3rd edition when it comes to most of the more powerful mages. Still there are tons of mages over 20th level in 3ed Faerun and quite a few over 30th (Elminster, Simbul, Larloch, Khelben, Ioulaum, Telamont Tanthul, Szass Tam, couple of Twisted Rune liches, Aumvor the Undying, Qysar Shoon the Demilich - those are just the ones I remember from the top of my head).

    I must admit there was some appeal in the fact those character were so goddamn powerful, it makes them feel legendary.

    It was also the fun experience being able to kill such a powerful foes as Firkraag or Demogorgon. It was more satysfing than killing any enemy encountered in BG1. That *however* doesn't mean that battles in BG3 won't be any less excited for me.
    The vast majority of them got drained. The main characteristic of the Spellplague was to drain powerful magical items and artifacts. But this also happened with powerful magic-infused beings. So, a great many of those super-powerful arcanists all got drained and died. The way they killed off the Simbul was so sad. She was one of my all-time best loved NPCs. She died slowly wasting away in Elminster's arms, shifting back and forth between complete madness and being the equivalent of a helpless child.
  • SjerrieSjerrie Member Posts: 1,237
    ThacoBell wrote: »
    Dude, do you know what bears are capable of irl? I'm surprised anyone can kill a bear something like a spear or bow (maybe with 8 other guys). Modern bear guns (which are capable of dropping elephants) DON'T ALWAYS WORK. Its insane and bears are terrifying. If anything D&D nerfs bears into oblivion. A brown bear should start at dire bear stats and they should get stronger from there. Fun Fact: The oldest known word for "bear" isn't the actual word for bear from that language. It was never spoken out of fear of summoning one. The word that survives translates roughly as "ruin" or "destruction".

    There are a LOT of videos of people hunting Bears with spears/bows. People tend to downplay bows and spears too much. A british warbow firing a broad head arrow probably can kill this wild animals.

    A video of a Javelin thrower killing a bear with a spear throw.

    EDIT : You are also downplaying "hunting rifles", a .45-70 rifle a 458 Winchest Magnum is so powerful.

    Key words from that video: "hunter" and "former javelin competitor".

    So by no means a run-of-the-mill commoner (who likely wouldn't have access to that kind of weapon) and likely not a 1st level character either.
  • CahirCahir Member, Moderator, Translator (NDA) Posts: 2,819
    kanisatha wrote: »
    Cahir wrote: »
    I don't know how it's like in 4e or 5e Faerun (I stopped following timeline after 3.5), but I have notice overall nerfing in 3rd edition when it comes to most of the more powerful mages. Still there are tons of mages over 20th level in 3ed Faerun and quite a few over 30th (Elminster, Simbul, Larloch, Khelben, Ioulaum, Telamont Tanthul, Szass Tam, couple of Twisted Rune liches, Aumvor the Undying, Qysar Shoon the Demilich - those are just the ones I remember from the top of my head).

    I must admit there was some appeal in the fact those character were so goddamn powerful, it makes them feel legendary.

    It was also the fun experience being able to kill such a powerful foes as Firkraag or Demogorgon. It was more satysfing than killing any enemy encountered in BG1. That *however* doesn't mean that battles in BG3 won't be any less excited for me.
    The vast majority of them got drained. The main characteristic of the Spellplague was to drain powerful magical items and artifacts. But this also happened with powerful magic-infused beings. So, a great many of those super-powerful arcanists all got drained and died. The way they killed off the Simbul was so sad. She was one of my all-time best loved NPCs. She died slowly wasting away in Elminster's arms, shifting back and forth between complete madness and being the equivalent of a helpless child.

    Yeah, I think I wrote about this somewhere. Sad indeed, but at least she died saving the love of her life. Fourth edition lore was so bad, that I cannot fathom to this day how could WotC pull off something like this...
  • ThacoBellThacoBell Member Posts: 12,235
    ThacoBell wrote: »
    Dude, do you know what bears are capable of irl? I'm surprised anyone can kill a bear something like a spear or bow (maybe with 8 other guys). Modern bear guns (which are capable of dropping elephants) DON'T ALWAYS WORK. Its insane and bears are terrifying. If anything D&D nerfs bears into oblivion. A brown bear should start at dire bear stats and they should get stronger from there. Fun Fact: The oldest known word for "bear" isn't the actual word for bear from that language. It was never spoken out of fear of summoning one. The word that survives translates roughly as "ruin" or "destruction".

    There are a LOT of videos of people hunting Bears with spears/bows. People tend to downplay bows and spears too much. A british warbow firing a broad head arrow probably can kill this wild animals.

    A video of a Javelin thrower killing a bear with a spear throw.

    EDIT : You are also downplaying "hunting rifles", a .45-70 rifle a 458 Winchest Magnum is so powerful.

    There's also a LOT of documented events where hunter's were killed by bears after having shot them multiple times with guns designed to kill said bears.My personal "favorite" is one where 3 hunters, all armed with guns designed specifically to hunt bears, opened fire on a grizzly simultaneously. The bear lived long enough to run up and grab one of them, drag him away (while the other two are shooting it!), and kill him before dropping dead.

    If you feel particularly brave, you can look some historical bear attacks, one of which involved a single bear depopulating a village over time because an entire hunting party couldn't bring it down.

    Saying a gun is "so powerful" doesn't mean much when the thing you shoot doesn't die.
  • SorcererV1ct0rSorcererV1ct0r Member Posts: 2,176
    ThacoBell wrote: »
    ThacoBell wrote: »
    Dude, do you know what bears are capable of irl? I'm surprised anyone can kill a bear something like a spear or bow (maybe with 8 other guys). Modern bear guns (which are capable of dropping elephants) DON'T ALWAYS WORK. Its insane and bears are terrifying. If anything D&D nerfs bears into oblivion. A brown bear should start at dire bear stats and they should get stronger from there. Fun Fact: The oldest known word for "bear" isn't the actual word for bear from that language. It was never spoken out of fear of summoning one. The word that survives translates roughly as "ruin" or "destruction".

    There are a LOT of videos of people hunting Bears with spears/bows. People tend to downplay bows and spears too much. A british warbow firing a broad head arrow probably can kill this wild animals.

    A video of a Javelin thrower killing a bear with a spear throw.

    EDIT : You are also downplaying "hunting rifles", a .45-70 rifle a 458 Winchest Magnum is so powerful.

    There's also a LOT of documented events where hunter's were killed by bears after having shot them multiple times with guns designed to kill said bears.My personal "favorite" is one where 3 hunters, all armed with guns designed specifically to hunt bears, opened fire on a grizzly simultaneously. The bear lived long enough to run up and grab one of them, drag him away (while the other two are shooting it!), and kill him before dropping dead.

    If you feel particularly brave, you can look some historical bear attacks, one of which involved a single bear depopulating a village over time because an entire hunting party couldn't bring it down.

    Saying a gun is "so powerful" doesn't mean much when the thing you shoot doesn't die.

    Many countries and states has retarded gun legislation approved by a bunch of politicians who never steeped in a firing range(but I don't wanna be very off topic), so lawful hunters often are forced to hunt with small caliber firearms. And the notion that every "hunting rifle" is the same is not truth. A hunting rifle can be chambered in .22 LR or in .700 nitro express.

    But my point is that lv 0/1 guys on forgotten realms would have any chance against even pet animals.

    And this in the sword coast setting. In Dark Sun Setting, even your house pet can have psionic and deal d6 damage with the most basic one.
  • PsicoVicPsicoVic Member Posts: 868
    edited August 2020
    ThacoBell wrote: »
    Aw, no fairie dragon?

    Says the guy who's not going to play the game...

    Pact of the Chain warlocks can:

    When you cast the spell, you can choose one of the normal forms for your familiar or one of the following special forms: imp, pseudodragon, quasit, or sprite.


    Ed: I forgot, in Volo´s book (if your DM allows it, with I do for example) you can add a cranium rat, a crawling claw, a gazer,...
  • kanisathakanisatha Member Posts: 1,308
    Cahir wrote: »
    kanisatha wrote: »
    Cahir wrote: »
    I don't know how it's like in 4e or 5e Faerun (I stopped following timeline after 3.5), but I have notice overall nerfing in 3rd edition when it comes to most of the more powerful mages. Still there are tons of mages over 20th level in 3ed Faerun and quite a few over 30th (Elminster, Simbul, Larloch, Khelben, Ioulaum, Telamont Tanthul, Szass Tam, couple of Twisted Rune liches, Aumvor the Undying, Qysar Shoon the Demilich - those are just the ones I remember from the top of my head).

    I must admit there was some appeal in the fact those character were so goddamn powerful, it makes them feel legendary.

    It was also the fun experience being able to kill such a powerful foes as Firkraag or Demogorgon. It was more satysfing than killing any enemy encountered in BG1. That *however* doesn't mean that battles in BG3 won't be any less excited for me.
    The vast majority of them got drained. The main characteristic of the Spellplague was to drain powerful magical items and artifacts. But this also happened with powerful magic-infused beings. So, a great many of those super-powerful arcanists all got drained and died. The way they killed off the Simbul was so sad. She was one of my all-time best loved NPCs. She died slowly wasting away in Elminster's arms, shifting back and forth between complete madness and being the equivalent of a helpless child.

    Yeah, I think I wrote about this somewhere. Sad indeed, but at least she died saving the love of her life. Fourth edition lore was so bad, that I cannot fathom to this day how could WotC pull off something like this...
    I know, but she should have died a glorious death as a warrior hero, standing strong against Thay to the end. I was already so very angry at how they killed off the Blackstaff (my #1 beloved FR NPC), and then they went and pulled this on my #2 beloved FR NPC!

    Even the gods who died during that time, Mystra, Helm, Eilistraee, all died in ridiculous and pathetic ways, getting conned or tricked into situations that result in their deaths.
  • CahirCahir Member, Moderator, Translator (NDA) Posts: 2,819
    edited August 2020
    kanisatha wrote: »
    Cahir wrote: »
    kanisatha wrote: »
    Cahir wrote: »
    I don't know how it's like in 4e or 5e Faerun (I stopped following timeline after 3.5), but I have notice overall nerfing in 3rd edition when it comes to most of the more powerful mages. Still there are tons of mages over 20th level in 3ed Faerun and quite a few over 30th (Elminster, Simbul, Larloch, Khelben, Ioulaum, Telamont Tanthul, Szass Tam, couple of Twisted Rune liches, Aumvor the Undying, Qysar Shoon the Demilich - those are just the ones I remember from the top of my head).

    I must admit there was some appeal in the fact those character were so goddamn powerful, it makes them feel legendary.

    It was also the fun experience being able to kill such a powerful foes as Firkraag or Demogorgon. It was more satysfing than killing any enemy encountered in BG1. That *however* doesn't mean that battles in BG3 won't be any less excited for me.
    The vast majority of them got drained. The main characteristic of the Spellplague was to drain powerful magical items and artifacts. But this also happened with powerful magic-infused beings. So, a great many of those super-powerful arcanists all got drained and died. The way they killed off the Simbul was so sad. She was one of my all-time best loved NPCs. She died slowly wasting away in Elminster's arms, shifting back and forth between complete madness and being the equivalent of a helpless child.

    Yeah, I think I wrote about this somewhere. Sad indeed, but at least she died saving the love of her life. Fourth edition lore was so bad, that I cannot fathom to this day how could WotC pull off something like this...
    I know, but she should have died a glorious death as a warrior hero, standing strong against Thay to the end. I was already so very angry at how they killed off the Blackstaff (my #1 beloved FR NPC), and then they went and pulled this on my #2 beloved FR NPC!

    Even the gods who died during that time, Mystra, Helm, Eilistraee, all died in ridiculous and pathetic ways, getting conned or tricked into situations that result in their deaths.

    How did they kill Blackstaff? I vaguely remember he had
    died defending some elven city.
  • kanisathakanisatha Member Posts: 1,308
    Cahir wrote: »
    kanisatha wrote: »
    Cahir wrote: »
    kanisatha wrote: »
    Cahir wrote: »
    I don't know how it's like in 4e or 5e Faerun (I stopped following timeline after 3.5), but I have notice overall nerfing in 3rd edition when it comes to most of the more powerful mages. Still there are tons of mages over 20th level in 3ed Faerun and quite a few over 30th (Elminster, Simbul, Larloch, Khelben, Ioulaum, Telamont Tanthul, Szass Tam, couple of Twisted Rune liches, Aumvor the Undying, Qysar Shoon the Demilich - those are just the ones I remember from the top of my head).

    I must admit there was some appeal in the fact those character were so goddamn powerful, it makes them feel legendary.

    It was also the fun experience being able to kill such a powerful foes as Firkraag or Demogorgon. It was more satysfing than killing any enemy encountered in BG1. That *however* doesn't mean that battles in BG3 won't be any less excited for me.
    The vast majority of them got drained. The main characteristic of the Spellplague was to drain powerful magical items and artifacts. But this also happened with powerful magic-infused beings. So, a great many of those super-powerful arcanists all got drained and died. The way they killed off the Simbul was so sad. She was one of my all-time best loved NPCs. She died slowly wasting away in Elminster's arms, shifting back and forth between complete madness and being the equivalent of a helpless child.

    Yeah, I think I wrote about this somewhere. Sad indeed, but at least she died saving the love of her life. Fourth edition lore was so bad, that I cannot fathom to this day how could WotC pull off something like this...
    I know, but she should have died a glorious death as a warrior hero, standing strong against Thay to the end. I was already so very angry at how they killed off the Blackstaff (my #1 beloved FR NPC), and then they went and pulled this on my #2 beloved FR NPC!

    Even the gods who died during that time, Mystra, Helm, Eilistraee, all died in ridiculous and pathetic ways, getting conned or tricked into situations that result in their deaths.

    How did they kill Blackstaff? I vaguely remember he had
    died defending some elven city.
    He gives his life essence to a magically raised elven city.
    It's in the novel "Blackstaff" that is part of the "Wizards" series. It happens just before the Spellplague, but WotC confirmed it was part of their overall plan to get rid of iconic FR NPCs in the transition to 4e.
  • IrennanIrennan Member Posts: 54
    kanisatha wrote: »
    I know, but she should have died a glorious death as a warrior hero, standing strong against Thay to the end. I was already so very angry at how they killed off the Blackstaff (my #1 beloved FR NPC), and then they went and pulled this on my #2 beloved FR NPC!

    Even the gods who died during that time, Mystra, Helm, Eilistraee, all died in ridiculous and pathetic ways, getting conned or tricked into situations that result in their deaths.

    And for this I'm glad that 5e threw the 3e-4e transition "stories" in the trash where they belong, and revealed that Mystra, Helm, and Eilistraee all survived.

  • ThacoBellThacoBell Member Posts: 12,235
    @SorcererV1ct0r "Many countries and states has retarded gun legislation approved by a bunch of politicians who never steeped in a firing range(but I don't wanna be very off topic), so lawful hunters often are forced to hunt with small caliber firearms. And the notion that every "hunting rifle" is the same is not truth. A hunting rifle can be chambered in .22 LR or in .700 nitro express."

    I see you completely ignored when I stated, multiple times, the hunters were using bear guns, which are very large caliber and powerful.

    I also don't think using an ableist slur to describe ANYTHING is appropriate.
  • DinoDinDinoDin Member Posts: 1,597

    I dislike these inconsistencies as well, but they are rife within CRPGs. For example - Apparently my fresh Bhaalspawn who has lived his life in Candlekeep is as experienced as Khalid, a fighter who has traveled from Calimshan and is a member of the Harpers.

    At some point, you just have accept it comes with the territory.

    Well said and a great example. People need to accept that these are games and role playing experiences combined. And sometimes you have to make some sacrifices to get that to work. Otherwise you'd have unfair or imbalanced companion choices.

    And IMO, generally these games should sacrifice more towards the game, fairness side, instead of the believability, role-playing side. RPG's with weak story and characters can still succeed imo -- IWD, the Diablo series. But without a foundation of good and fair gameplay, I don't think an RPG with a great story will succeed.
  • megamike15megamike15 Member Posts: 2,666
    i disagree. an rpg can have the best game play in the world but if the story does not gripe me then i see no reason to continue playing it.

    at that point i may as well be playing a more game play focused genre. when i come to an rpg for the story telling.
  • PsicoVicPsicoVic Member Posts: 868
    Dunno, I had examples of both.
    BG, PoE2, Tyranny, Tales of cold steel, I enjoy both combat and story, I liked Mass effect but despise the continuous FPS combat in small rooms, I have fun with Grandia 3 and Valkiria chronicles 2 but the story was atrocious...
  • megamike15megamike15 Member Posts: 2,666
    mario and luigi dream team has great combat but it's story is barly there and has horrible pacing.
  • mlnevesemlnevese Member, Moderator Posts: 10,214
    I'm starting to have some hope for this game. I may even buy the Early Access...
  • byrne20byrne20 Member Posts: 503
    @mlnevese nice to hear you are feeling positive. I am also considering early access, but not 100% decided yet as I might just wait until full release so I can get stuck into Baldur’s Gate 3 with no limits ? Temptation might get the better of me though as I am definitely looking forward to it.
Sign In or Register to comment.