The creator of Forgotten Realms chimes in
Pilgrimzero
Member Posts: 1
Ed Greenwoods FB page
I am saddened by what I hear of the current kerfluffle raging about Siege of Dragonspear and the trans character Amber Scott designed and included in it.
Folks, the Realms have ALWAYS had characters (mortals and deities) who crossdressed, changed gender (and not just to sneak past guards in an adventure, by way of shapeshifting magic or illusions), were actively bisexual, and openly gay. How underscored this was by TSR and later Wizards varied over time, and was always softpedaled, because D&D wasn't a sex game, and we generally don't rub the reader's nose in sex unless there's a good in-story reason for it.
But even deities have changed gender, sometimes for good, and the servants of deities (Elminster, in ELMINSTER: THE MAKING OF A MAGE) have sometimes been forced by the deity to "spend time as the other" to learn what life is like.
So it has always been there, and is an integral part of the Realms. With that said, I've never met a gamer yet who doesn't tinker with every adventure to "make it their own" at their own gaming table, so if trans, LGBT, or sexual matters at all don't suit your tastes and needs in your gaming sessions, leave it out or change it.
But D&D has half-orcs, and half-dragons, and half-elves, and has magic items that specifically change gender, right there in the rules. Surely, if you can handle the basic notion of cross-SPECIES sex, having a full variety of gender roles should be something that doesn't blow your mind. If it's not for you, that's fine. I hate wearing certain shades of yellow. But I don't scream and yell at someone I see wearing those shades of yellow, and call them names, and threaten things. My right to dislike yellow applies to me; it doesn't extend to others. Because somehow, through an incredible oversight on the part of the universe that still hasn't been rectified, no one made me a god. (I'm still crushed.)
114
Comments
There are a lot of new posters, like yourself, who are here to talk about the controversy. However, there are many, many new threads about this topic and it kind of floods the forum for many of us who have been writing here a long time and were eagerly awaiting the release and the chance to talk about it. The massive amounts of threads that exist on this topic might be crowding the board, and they are definitely deterring people from talking about other less contentious parts of the game due to fears that any thread will get pulled into the controversy.
This thread is the most active on this topic so far (I apologize in advance, though, as it is not very civil) https://forums.beamdog.com/discussion/50396/user-ratings-on-metacritic-spoilers/p26
And then only giving you the option to say, "you're so brave" or "ok", when I can tell the rest of the world to "shove it, I'm the bhallspawn".
I wish his opinion on the matter counted for something with everyone, but that's just pointless magical thinking. It will count for something with some people however and that is as much as we can reasonably hope for....
Thanks for posting this, especially for those of us who don't do FB.
"I am saddened by what I hear of the current kerfluffle raging about Siege of Dragonspear and the trans character Amber Scott designed and included in it"
"so if trans, LGBT, or sexual matters at all don't suit your tastes"
Lol, abount a sentence into the OP I was wondering how quickly people on the other side would find something to grab onto in an otherwise obviously supportive post. Oh well
You don't like trans people/characters, we get it. It's your right and opinion for xyz reasons. No judgment there. Ed agrees.
It has become quite obvious that it's nothing more than that. As with other people on similar cases. Nothing new.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Call_a_spade_a_spade
When the creator of the Forgotten Realms himself, has approved trans characters by expressing his sadness on the issue and bringing examples of his own, the debate on what is setting-appropriate is over.
Wish I could give 'em all a hug and a mug of hot cocoa....
Would you say that it's as sensitive as say people complaining about a joke in a certain tombstone in Pillars of Eternity? Like I said, it's not about the quantity but about how it was written. It's just bad writing.
Gamergate claimed that trans people had no place in Forgotten Realms, and the creator just made an entire post explaining why they do. Now we have an issue of cognitive dissonance: do you continue believing something about a medium that said medium's creator has directly refuted, or do you accept that your initial assessment of the medium was incorrect? It's a tough one.
You wouldn't let those reviews dissuade you for buying the game, right? Why shouldn't it be the same for anyone else who doesn't care about SJWs?
Internet mobs are super mobby.