Skip to content

Pick my next Bhaalspawn's class (no clockbait 100% real no faek)

CrevsDaakCrevsDaak Member Posts: 7,155
edited March 2017 in General Discussion (Spoiler Warning!)
I'll eventually play them all (most votes to least votes to weirdest specific suggestions) but I don't know which to one to play right now. Build suggestions are welcome as well. Just pick the one you'd like to see me dying to Tarnesh struggle to remain alive playing the saga with (and documenting in the no-reload thread)!
  1. Pick my next Bhaalspawn's class (no clockbait 100% real no faek)46 votes
    1. Wizard Slayer/Transmuter
      21.74%
    2. Wild Mage->Fighter
      13.04%
    3. Cleric/Thief
        8.70%
    4. Totemic Druid
        6.52%
    5. Fighter/Druid
        6.52%
    6. Bounty Hunter
      10.87%
    7. Beast Master
        8.70%
    8. Swashbuckler->Cleric
        2.17%
    9. Stalker->Cleric
        6.52%
    10. Other (PLEASE be specific)
      15.22%

Comments

  • ThacoBellThacoBell Member Posts: 12,235
    I dont think I can keep myself from suggesting Wild Mage whenever a no reload run is mentioned.
  • FardragonFardragon Member Posts: 4,511
    edited March 2017
    I don't think two of those are allowed...

    Anyway, wizard slayer/ cleric.
  • Mantis37Mantis37 Member Posts: 1,177
    Gypsy from Song and Silence.
  • CrevsDaakCrevsDaak Member Posts: 7,155
    Fardragon said:

    I don't think two of those are allowed...

    Wizard Slayer/Transmuter is doable with the multikit mod, and Wild Mages can dual on my install.
  • semiticgoddesssemiticgoddess Member Posts: 14,903
    The Wizard Slayer kit will make BG1 and BG2 a breeze, but the Transmuter kit will be crippling in ToB. Sounds interesting to me.
  • SkatanSkatan Member, Moderator Posts: 5,352
    Such a weird combo cannot be ignored. Do it! :)
  • lroumenlroumen Member Posts: 2,538
    Solo or party?

    You could play as a commoner. 9 in all stats, no proficiencies. ;)
  • NeverusedNeverused Member Posts: 803
    ... @semiticgod , I'm kind of curious as to how Wizard Slayer is easy-mode in BG1. WS disallows Potions of Freedom, making Hold Person 100% terrifying until Spider's Bane. And it disallows the Greenstone Amulet, so Charm is even worse. And no Protection from Magic for Davaeorn. Unless, of course, you're playing with a party and you're just using the Wizard Slayer as an archer for disruption, in which case I feel a bit silly.

    Build suggestion for Wild Mage/Fighter: dual at level 2, and eventually use those for Reckless Dweomer's to cast all those 9th level spells and hope for the best! (Worst idea for a no-reload ever. I might do this myself. :tongue: )
  • Contemplative_HamsterContemplative_Hamster Member Posts: 844
    Wild Mage->Fighter. Dual at 9 to minimise your hit points. Specialise in clubs, crossbows and short swords. Oh, and Chaos Shield is for dweeps.
  • CrevsDaakCrevsDaak Member Posts: 7,155
    lroumen said:

    Solo or party?

    Solo. My BG1 install sucks for parties (it sucks for solo as well but once you get going it's manageable).
    Neverused said:

    ... semiticgod , I'm kind of curious as to how Wizard Slayer is easy-mode in BG1. WS disallows Potions of Freedom, making Hold Person 100% terrifying until Spider's Bane. And it disallows the Greenstone Amulet, so Charm is even worse. And no Protection from Magic for Davaeorn. Unless, of course, you're playing with a party and you're just using the Wizard Slayer as an archer for disruption, in which case I feel a bit silly.

    You can get Edvantar's Gift from Dushai. And you can use green scolls as a WS. It's not easy, that is true, but it's still a Warrior class in BG1.
    Neverused said:

    Build suggestion for Wild Mage/Fighter: dual at level 2, and eventually use those for Reckless Dweomer's to cast all those 9th level spells and hope for the best! (Worst idea for a no-reload ever. I might do this myself. :tongue: )

    Actually, that's exactly what I am going to do and had planned since I got the idea of a character that started training as a Mage, but then realised she sucked at magic and picked up a sword.
    lroumen said:

    You could play as a commoner. 9 in all stats, no proficiencies. ;)

    I don't think I could manage to do that with anything else than a Sorcerer tbh (btw I'm not playing a Sorcerer without SR, and my SR install is a bit lacklustre so no Sorcerers until I get a new BGT install with SR).
  • mlnevesemlnevese Member, Moderator Posts: 10,214
    SethDavis said:

    Pure fighter, the most exotic of choices

    My first character was actually a pure fighter... I usually play a fighter the first time I play a computer RPG. For some reason I don't stick to that rule when playing a pen & paper game... Don't ask me why, I have no idea...
  • lroumenlroumen Member Posts: 2,538
    edited March 2017
    Solo. Then beastmaster has great progression imo.

    Btw. Any class will be fine with all nines. Just means you need to really use all those potions and items you hoard.
  • KamigoroshiKamigoroshi Member Posts: 5,870
    Alchemist. Because there is a huge lack of no-reload runs with fan-made kits out there. And one shouldn't go down without a holy hand grenade's bang.
  • NoobaccaNoobacca Member Posts: 139
    Specialist mage dualed Thief. Maybe an enchanter or illusionist?

    I don't think it'll be anything near as difficult as the other suggestions but would still be entertaining to see how far it'll go.
  • CrevsDaakCrevsDaak Member Posts: 7,155
    edited March 2017
    Okay, here's the order in which I'll be playing my next PCs.

    Wizard Slayer/Transmuter
    Wild Mage->Fighter
    Wild Mage (because I am not playing a Sorcerer)
    Wizard Slayer->Cleric
    Gypsy
    Illusionist->Thief
    Alchemist
    Fighter
    Bounty Hunter
    Beast Master
    Cleric/Thief
    Totemic Druid
    Fighter/Druid
    Swashbuckler->Cleric
    Stalker->Cleric

    I already started playing the WS/T and (link), well, it's so easy to get a lot of gold early on when you can't use anything.

    Edit: Wait, if @wubble makes a suggestion I'll play the suggestions before the Wild Mage->Fighter.
    Post edited by CrevsDaak on
  • Mantis37Mantis37 Member Posts: 1,177
    I'm looking forward to the RP of WS/ Transmuter- I used to hate magic & myself, but then I decided that it was time for change!
  • CrevsDaakCrevsDaak Member Posts: 7,155
    Mantis37 said:

    I'm looking forward to the RP of WS/ Transmuter- I used to hate magic & myself, but then I decided that it was time for change!

    It's actually a multikit so it's more like "I'm a wizard-hunting wizard!".
  • JumboWheat01JumboWheat01 Member Posts: 1,028
    Actually, if you were a Wizard-hunting Wizard, wouldn't being an Abjurer be more thematic? Abjuration is where dismissal, dispel and counterspell is, yes?
  • NimranNimran Member Posts: 4,875
    edited March 2017
    A Ferret sorcerer!

    Or wild mage.
  • TheGreatKhanTheGreatKhan Member Posts: 106
    Definitely Wizard Slayer to Transmuter. Wizard slayer is a class I don't want to touch in the first BG game.
  • Contemplative_HamsterContemplative_Hamster Member Posts: 844
    ... and Breach etc. are hard to live without in BG2. Definitely a challenging combo.
  • tbone1tbone1 Member Posts: 1,985
    Nimran said:

    A Ferret sorcerer!

    Or wild mage.

    Tantamount to the same thing, really.

Sign In or Register to comment.

2024 Overhaul Games, a division of Beamdog. © 2024 Hasbro, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Baldur's Gate, Dungeons & Dragons, D&D, Forgotten Realms, Baldur's Gate, Wizards of the Coast and their logos are trademarks of Wizards of the Coast LLC in the U.S.A. and other countries, and are used with permission. Hasbro and its logo are trademarks of Hasbro, Inc. and are used with permission. © 1998 BioWare Corp. All Rights Reserved. BioWare, the BioWare Infinity Engine and the BioWare logo are trademarks of Bioware Corp. Black Isle Studios and the Black Isle Studios logo are trademarks of Interplay Entertainment Corp. Atari and the Atari logo are trademarks owned by Atari Interactive, Inc. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners.