563 When I see that a topic with more than 10 pages has got a new post, but I really don't feel in the mood of reading it from the beginning nor read only the last page so I decide to ignore it.
564. When @Anduin writes a statement that can either be agreed wit or disagreed with... Yet receives a splattering of insightfuls and a couple of likes for his troubles.
Come on guys and gals! You gotta agree with me that this is annoying!
564. When Anduin writes a statement that can either be agreed wit or disagreed with... Yet receives a splattering of insightfuls and a couple of likes for his troubles.
Come on guys and gals! You gotta agree with me that this is annoying!
564. When Anduin writes a statement that can either be agreed wit or disagreed with... Yet receives a splattering of insightfuls and a couple of likes for his troubles.
Come on guys and gals! You gotta agree with me that this is annoying!
564. When Anduin writes a statement that can either be agreed wit or disagreed with... Yet receives a splattering of insightfuls and a couple of likes for his troubles.
Come on guys and gals! You gotta agree with me that this is annoying!
114011411142. You come across the term "ISO metric" for screw threads and for some reason you read it as "isometric", which immediately reminds you of Baldur's Gate.
573. You read the above quote and start frantically looking for the new thread on screws.
576. Someone starts talking about you know what, then a mod comes and tells people they are free to talk about it as long as it doesn't violate the site rules.
577. Violations do happen and another thread about you know what is closed.
576. Someone starts talking about you know what, then a mod comes and tells people they are free to talk about it as long as it doesn't violate the site rules.
I have a question for the administrator. You avoid to mention something, I suppose the name of a SoD NPC by the context, using the phrase "you know what" instead. And you also tell that a moderator comes and tells people they are free to talk about it as long as it doesn't violate the site rules.
Must I interpret this as supporting that moderator and telling that if the forums rules are not violated we are free to talk of everything, in the appropriate sections and without going OT?
Or must I interpret this as a warning that talking of some things here is not allowed, even if is done according to the forum rules (being excellent to each other, in topic, avoiding flames and spam and so on)?
My question has nothing to do with the Mizhena querelle, that personally I found boring, too American to interest me (I didn't even know that SJW existed ), exaggerate in tones as imo few lines of dialogue, good or bad is not important, don't justify pages and pages on boards, numerous reviews of a game on YT and elsewhere based only or mainly on that. And as I don't own SoD I don't even know what about the people was talking about, certainly don't have a personal opinion on something that I don't even know.
My question is only to know if there are or not topics that on those boards we are not allowed to talk about, and eventually what them are. And In the case I am not against it, as I am convinced that a forum is not a democracy, there are administrators that set rules, moderators that have to control that the rules are respected and forumites that have to respect them. But if some of that rules are set outside the forum rules topic is my right, and duty, to know that them exist and what them are, elsewhere how can I respect them?
Know, that i'm not an administrator, but i'm sure, that your first interpretation is true @gorgonzola . There are no restricted topics, aside the ones mentioned in the site rules. (Mainly non PG-13 themes, flaming/trolling, piracy.) @JuliusBorisov made a fun comment in a fun thread.
Comments
Bummer...but French is so much hotter than world...
Come on guys and gals! You gotta agree with me that this is annoying!
Feed my soul to a pink unicorn...
and...
Oh wait...
566. You make a fremisis.
Heh.
570. Nobody complains it's a repetition
577. Violations do happen and another thread about you know what is closed.
You avoid to mention something, I suppose the name of a SoD NPC by the context, using the phrase "you know what" instead.
And you also tell that a moderator comes and tells people they are free to talk about it as long as it doesn't violate the site rules.
Must I interpret this as supporting that moderator and telling that if the forums rules are not violated we are free to talk of everything, in the appropriate sections and without going OT?
Or must I interpret this as a warning that talking of some things here is not allowed, even if is done according to the forum rules (being excellent to each other, in topic, avoiding flames and spam and so on)?
My question has nothing to do with the Mizhena querelle, that personally I found boring, too American to interest me (I didn't even know that SJW existed
My question is only to know if there are or not topics that on those boards we are not allowed to talk about, and eventually what them are.
And In the case I am not against it, as I am convinced that a forum is not a democracy, there are administrators that set rules, moderators that have to control that the rules are respected and forumites that have to respect them. But if some of that rules are set outside the forum rules topic is my right, and duty, to know that them exist and what them are, elsewhere how can I respect them?